I used the term "high-risk" meaning that if they contract the virus they are at high risk of severe complications...such as folks with certain pre-existing conditions and the elderly. Based on the numbers that we've witnessed over the last several months, I think it's a fact that the majority of folks who contract the virus do not need the ICU or even medical attention at all.
The brain damage comment wasn't nice. I'm pretty sure that I remember the original "flatten the curve" effort as a way to protect hospitals from becoming overwhelmed with folks needing the ICU and ventilators. We wanted to prevent the spread because we didn't have the data we have now. However, with all of the positive cases we see every day, I think we know by now that contracting this virus isn't an automatic hospital sentence and doesn't mean you'll need to be on a ventilator...unless of course you fall into the "high-risk" category.
I think we have plenty of data showing that high numbers of folks who test positive do not need medical attention and thus it doesn't appear that the hospitals are at risk of becoming overwhelmed as originally thought. Consider this, with all of the new daily positive cases we've been seeing even with restrictions in place it's a good thing that most do not need medical attention...because if they did what we're doing now wouldn't be enough to keep the hospitals from becoming overwhelmed.
Oh yeah...I hate Fastpass+ too and looking forward to going to WDW in roughly 2 weeks for a taste of old school standby pre-FP and FP+.