News Walt Disney Company plans to spend $17 billion at Walt Disney World over the next ten years

Sorcerer Mickey

Well-Known Member
This thread is hilarious. Certain people on this board do nothing but complain about every move WDW makes, including whining that they don’t pour enough money into the parks for upkeep and expansion, etc. Then this announcement comes out and those same folks say “well, they won’t actually do it” or “that’s not really that much” or “they are just trying to spin” or words to that effect. If Universal had made this same announcement, these people would be saying “look at that, Universal just continues to get it right and dominate WDW.” It honestly makes you wonder why certain folks spend so much of their time on a forum entitled WDWMAGIC.

Anyway you slice it, this is a MAJOR announcement for WDW!
Do you remember when they announced Epcot's redo?
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
This thread is hilarious. Certain people on this board do nothing but complain about every move WDW makes, including whining that they don’t pour enough money into the parks for upkeep and expansion, etc. Then this announcement comes out and those same folks say “well, they won’t actually do it” or “that’s not really that much” or “they are just trying to spin” or words to that effect. If Universal had made this same announcement, these people would be saying “look at that, Universal just continues to get it right and dominate WDW.” It honestly makes you wonder why certain folks spend so much of their time on a forum entitled WDWMAGIC.

Anyway you slice it, this is a MAJOR announcement for WDW!
Oh…things must be so fun in your mental happy place today!!😍

Now…this is part of a larger, more important discussion about corporate governance, politics and the changing landscape…not a pep rally.

I look forward to your constructive comments on the multiple threads discussing this 👍🏻
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
I went back and looked at domestic parks & resorts capex for the last decade (which includes Disneyland and Disney Cruise Line). I think these are the numbers:
View attachment 708516

Then I tried to calculate the value of a $17B capex over the next decade, with 4% inflation (stop laughing, okay?):

View attachment 708518

Don't me wrong - $17B is a lot of money for the local economy. But it doesn't seem too different than the last decade of spend. Taking inflation into account, it might be slightly less.

I don't know anything about accounting, so I could be completely wrong here.
As usual…your take/numbers does a great job of keeping the discussion realistic. Thank you as always.
 

Disney Dead Head

Active Member
I went back and looked at domestic parks & resorts capex for the last decade (which includes Disneyland and Disney Cruise Line). I think these are the numbers:
View attachment 708516

Then I tried to calculate the value of a $17B capex over the next decade, with 4% inflation (stop laughing, okay?):

View attachment 708518

Don't me wrong - $17B is a lot of money for the local economy. But it doesn't seem too different than the last decade of spend. Taking inflation into account, it might be slightly less.

I don't know anything about accounting, so I could be completely wrong here.
That's one new Cruise Ship every year - Wish was actually $1.8
 

GhostHost1000

Premium Member
No, what he actually does is argue with anyone and everyone who dares to see things differently from him, and he does so with a rude and condescending tone.
You can see it however you want just as others can see it however they want.

I hate being negative about some things because we all love Disney and I still do, but some of us have been around long enough to see trends and when things are announced what may/may not actually happen as well.

I would love nothing more than $17B be put into attraction expansion, but I know that’s not reality
 

JusticeDisney

Well-Known Member
You can see it however you want just as others can see it however they want.

I hate being negative about some things because we all love Disney and I still do, but some of us have been around long enough to see trends and when things are announced what may/may not actually happen as well.

I would love nothing more than $17B be put into attraction expansion, but I know that’s not reality
And you can see things however you want.
 

gorillaball

Well-Known Member
No but whether you paid $25 or stood in line for 2 hours, the ride was still half working.
So you could in fact ride without paying $25, kind of like a bad clickbait headline - misleading.

And Woody's lunch box only grilled cheese and poptarts - I understand you are exaggerating but for a quick service place I think they have some pretty good options. Brisket melt - good, Totchos - good.
 

castlecake2.0

Well-Known Member
I went back and looked at domestic parks & resorts capex for the last decade (which includes Disneyland and Disney Cruise Line). I think these are the numbers:
View attachment 708516

Then I tried to calculate the value of a $17B capex over the next decade, with 4% inflation (stop laughing, okay?):

View attachment 708518

Don't me wrong - $17B is a lot of money for the local economy. But it doesn't seem too different than the last decade of spend. Taking inflation into account, it might be slightly less.

I don't know anything about accounting, so I could be completely wrong here.
Is this for all domestic spending? Because I think the bob announcement was specifically just for WDW?
 

GhostHost1000

Premium Member
So you could in fact ride without paying $25, kind of like a bad clickbait headline - misleading.

And Woody's lunch box only grilled cheese and poptarts - I understand you are exaggerating but for a quick service place I think they have some pretty good options. Brisket melt - good, Totchos - good.
How it is misleading? The ride was half working. That was the headline. Whether someone paid for ILL or stood in line for 2+ hours, they would like the full experience
 

JusticeDisney

Well-Known Member
I think people would have a much more positive take if he said “We will be spending 17B on new lands and attractions in the next 10 years”.

However that is not what he said.
That’s a very fair look at it. Of course, even if that is precisely what he said, plenty of people would still say things like “oh, BS, I’ll believe it when I see it.” Anyway, I agree with you that, at this point, it’s all just words.
 

GhostHost1000

Premium Member
That’s a very fair look at it. Of course, even if that is precisely what he said, plenty of people would still say things like “oh, BS, I’ll believe it when I see it.” Anyway, I agree with you that, at this point, it’s all just words.
I would be one that would still say I’ll believe it when I see it. Just like the Main Street Theater, Mary Poppins attraction and observation deck building at Epcot, Hyperion Wharf, Reflections Resort, etc etc
 

Phicinfan

Well-Known Member
1. Remember how contract ends have gone prior with “the board”?
2. Who appointed “the board”?
3. Remember the public/investor they were getting last year?


…I’ll see myself out
Different scenario sir. It was majorly stressed he was on a time table and he was to find the next person. That was his goal, oh and fix Disney... so no pressure.

See yourself out though... don't let us stop ya ;)
 

Drdcm

Well-Known Member
Glad to see you back doing nothing but starting arguments with everyone under the sun again! It is, after all, what you do best! Now, please continue to enlighten the rest of us with your condescension and ignorance!
Ok I’m going to bite... You seem to be the only person coming in here to complain about others. Maybe act like a mature adult and learn to block/ignore the people you don’t along with? Nobody else on these forums cares about your petty squabbles with specific individuals.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom