I don't disagree. Had they planned Cars in DHS, in AC, then I think the hubub for Muppets would have been a bit less - but again that would have made DHS - Pixar + SW.Cars doesn't even fit the feel of the MK...it should be in DHS
nothing wrong with that.... seems to make sense......I don't disagree. Had they planned Cars in DHS, in AC, then I think the hubub for Muppets would have been a bit less - but again that would have made DHS - Pixar + SW.
Having DHS revolve Pixar, Lucas Film and more mature Fox properties makes a lot of sense actually.I don't disagree. Had they planned Cars in DHS, in AC, then I think the hubub for Muppets would have been a bit less - but again that would have made DHS - Pixar + SW.
Is that a bad thing? Doesn’t that make sense?but again that would have made DHS - Pixar + SW.
I am sorry if this has already been said, but why does Disney want to build over rivers of America and TSI instead of just building behind them. Is it guest access? Do they just want to get rid of this area and this is how they are proposing to do it? It is is money related, how is this cheaper than building above TSI? Thanks…
Not saying its a bad thing, but Incredibles and some other Disney animation would be great as wellIs that a bad thing? Doesn’t that make sense?
Not saying its a bad thing, but Incredibles and some other Disney animation would be great as well
I haven't seen anyone bring this up, but if the live action Stitch movie is successful, could Stitch come back to Stitch area?I expect Stitch next. Something could slowly be shaping up.
I think this is a bit of a mix up.In addition to what has been said there are some reports that the river and access canal need a lot of structural work and park ops has been asking for something to be done so they would have to spend a lot of $ anyway just to keep it going and for things that are rather low attended
Incredibles In Space v. Aliens (1960s retro version) would be ideal for Tomorrowland.Not saying its a bad thing, but Incredibles and some other Disney animation would be great as well
I think this is a bit of a mix up.
The park ops were against extending the dead end that is at big thunder.
Easy to do… and the no dead end is partially how we ended up here.You are right, combined two parts, mixed them together incorrectly
I’m glad they include King Magnifico.Magnifico isn’t popular either plus his movie bombed yet there he is. I would take Frollo over him any day of the week if this is actually an indication of which villains we’ll see.
It looks to be one rollercoaster. However, with Villains Land, it seems that the concept art is a rough idea and there is nothing set in stone. Josh D'Amaro was correct when saying it is in active development, but I think this land is probably the least developed of everything announced and will be built by 2030Is it two separate roller coaters we're looking at in the concept art? or just the one? and if so, then is the second attraction over on the right-hand side in that building/castle?
The thorns and dragon is obviously maleficent related, but i the train whizzing past in that green bit in the bottom centre of the art reminds me so much of Hade's river of death.
They’d love to have their own GOT. Percy Jackson has done well for them. The new GOT series on Max I think does well - I haven’t been following their ratings. If I had to guess they’re following the reception for something like Rings of Power. All that said, while I like the books, the IP is somewhat 1) unknown, and, to the extent it’s known, 2) not fondly due to the reception to the 1985 filmDisney bought (or rebought, I suppose) the rights to the series and had plans for a live action adaptation like a decade ago, but nothing ever came of it.
They can’t afford to, given insufficient capacity.Insiders have stated WDW management is not interested in taking a popular ride down for a month every year for an overlay. Hence why no overlays for the WDW Haunted Mansion.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.