News Villains Land Announced for Walt Disney World's Magic Kingdom

FutureCEO

Well-Known Member
To me, it would seem like removing/ relocating Small World and opening up that area as a new passage/Fantasyland village extension to the new portal entrance to Villains Land or whatever they will call it... Only remove the back half of the ROA leaving the Frontierland facing part of the ROA in place.... Expand the pat to the left side of the Haunted Mansion back to the newly acquired and filled in land without removing All of the ROA waterway... That section of the park would remain looking as it does without the intrusion of a cartoon franchise facing the historic section of the park... Small World would be the perfect addition to EPCOT...What other attraction is the absolute embodiment of World Celebration? They could do a new take on the Mary Blair facade with new tech and have another show and lighting opportunity.


Today's Disney is not going to relocate a big ride.
 

fgmnt

Well-Known Member
Not exactly on this topic, but there are 4 smaller pads that are more likely to get a new attraction before any actual expansion: Stitch pad, Speedway pad, Galaxy Palace Theater Pad, Adventureland pad. The next new attraction at MK after Villains will go in one of those places.
 

UNCgolf

Well-Known Member
This is what I'm talking about long term in an ideal world. Would need to remove part of Belle's Village (either Gaston's Inn or the store or bathrooms or all of it) to create a guest bridge to the new area.

Villains in red. Expanded Fantasyland in yellow. Guest walkways in blue. The path over Magic Kingdrom Drive would need to be a bridge over that road.

View attachment 811689

If they were going to do that, it would make more sense to build a connecting path over at the circus. That's an area they will hopefully demolish/retheme at some point anyways, so they'd have more freedom to make it work.
 

Quietmouse

Well-Known Member
Not exactly on this topic, but there are 4 smaller pads that are more likely to get a new attraction before any actual expansion: Stitch pad, Speedway pad, Galaxy Palace Theater Pad, Adventureland pad. The next new attraction at MK after Villains will go in one of those places.

Doesn’t really have to be after villains. No reason why they can’t construct a Moana boat ride in adventure land while at the same work on cars land/villains land.
 

ᗩLᘿᑕ ✨ ᗩζᗩᗰ

HOUSE OF MAGIC
Premium Member
I currently have a prayer circle set up, black goo from Prometheus, the whole set up. I just know they're looking into the area for development.
I think DHS is the better option. Though with Villains being introduced in MK, perhaps they can finally shed some of their saccharine sweet kiddo park branding and add back some of stuff for "all ages" including the more mature offerings.
 

RSoxNo1

Well-Known Member
Honestly, if they are hell bent on spending money to replace things instead of build on undeveloped ground, this would be the #1 thing to do. Put IASW in WS in Epcot, put in the Tokyo Tangled ride next to the bathrooms while creating a path to future Villains while opening up a ton of space for future FL expansion in the future.
Yep, now is the best possible time to do this.
 

RSoxNo1

Well-Known Member
Any plans I‘ve heard of have those two connections. Works for our SWGE, Pandora, and TSL.
Do you mean that there would be paths on both sides of Haunted Mansion to Villains?

It’s not really possible because they need to keep that road into the Utilidors. You’d need an enclosed guest tunnel. I can’t see that happening. And that doesn’t even account for fireworks issues. These kinds of issues are part of why RoA has to leave to make this work. But, there will still be space for expansion when they’re done.
Isn't the move just to do themed gates through the access road? That's common, no?
 

ToTBellHop

Well-Known Member
Do you mean that there would be paths on both sides of Haunted Mansion to Villains?


Isn't the move just to do themed gates through the access road? That's common, no?
On roads that need less frequent access than that one. The goal would be to avoid closing a guest pathway multiple times each day.

And I mean an entrance west of HM and another east of BTMRR.
 

Moth

Well-Known Member
I think DHS is the better option. Though with Villains being introduced in MK, perhaps they can finally shed some of their saccharine sweet kiddo park branding and add back some of stuff for "all ages" including the more mature offerings.
I'd love Alien in WDW as a whole but I'd greatly prefer DHS yeah. I wouldn't mind Nostromo in MK though. That'd be a good fit.


I don't know if it's gonna be Alien, some other IP, I just know the space has eyes on it. For all I know if could be like, a meet and greet space or something.
 

TheMaxRebo

Well-Known Member
I'd love Alien in WDW as a whole but I'd greatly prefer DHS yeah. I wouldn't mind Nostromo in MK though. That'd be a good fit.


I don't know if it's gonna be Alien, some other IP, I just know the space has eyes on it. For all I know if could be like, a meet and greet space or something.

They use it for meeting Elvis Stitch during the Halloween party. Obviously not the best use of the space but something that allowed for multiple character meets in doors in Tormorrowland wouldn't be the worst thing.

Could do Stitch, Buzz, (be great to have characters from Meet the Robinsons or something as well), etc
 

Fox&Hound

Well-Known Member
I am sorry if this has already been said, but why does Disney want to build over rivers of America and TSI instead of just building behind them. Is it guest access? Do they just want to get rid of this area and this is how they are proposing to do it? It is is money related, how is this cheaper than building above TSI? Thanks…
 

Gusey

Well-Known Member
I am sorry if this has already been said, but why does Disney want to build over rivers of America and TSI instead of just building behind them. Is it guest access? Do they just want to get rid of this area and this is how they are proposing to do it? It is is money related, how is this cheaper than building above TSI? Thanks…
They would have had to fill in parts of the river anyway to access there and chop down a lot of trees. It's cheaper for them to fill in the river and remove the island, helped by the lower attendance of these attractions
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom