ChrisFL
Premium Member
No, because in many ways it is absolutely true. The absence of Horizons has done more to fortify the "greatness" of Horizons then it's actual existence did. Personally, I liked Horizon, but, I didn't ride it every trip, as apparently most also didn't. It quickly became dull (if the highlight of memory for most people is the fact that you could smell oranges, that says it all). It was creative and well done. I always thought the ending was lame. Never did care for it much even though I understood its purpose, it just wasn't convincing. (and we now complain about the quality of Soarin's film) The ending was an exciting technology, however, it wasn't done as well as I think it could have been.
In short, if Horizon's were still operational, it would be playing to a near empty house, like it was before it was ended. When it was new and different and seemed technologically cutting edge, it was seen by many. It just didn't age well.
You may be surprised, but I disagree
We have to remember that the endings were done in 1983...film technology was still pretty old-school and I'll be the first to say that the ending movies weren't kept up to new condition as they should have been.
Did you know the Mesa Verde (desert) sequence was the longest single-shot sequence of a scale model in history? They put a TON of work into those things, and the idea that you can choose your own ending....YEARS before any other attraction even attempted such a thing, makes it special.
I don't mean that Horizons shouldn't have been updated, but seriously, people aren't on space stations yet, they aren't living in undersea cities, and we're still figuring out how to re-claim deserts for farm land (but I hear they're making progress).
Speaking of Bold visions, when has a video game simulator on a centrifuge ever been bold? I'm sorry I just don't get it. Horizons was a fully FAMILY oriented attraction with several visions of what the future could be like with real, scientific concepts, not fantasies.