News Tron coaster coming to the Magic Kingdom

TheEPCOTHistorian

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
Yes
I also remember those plans but now that they’ve been cancelled/shelved, it kinda highlights the fact that the placement of Tron was a poor decision.
That's just the ultimate "would've, could've, should've" that EPCOT Center really got to feel. Kind of sad when you consider the fact that it was all supposed to be completed together then it slowly got trimmed down bit by bit.

Oh well, eventually something will happen.
 

James Alucobond

Well-Known Member
But kids love it, and it could be great with a serious upgrade, and fit right in with TRON.
Usa Network Mizandmrs GIF by Miz & Mrs

(Sorry ... I actually agree with you. :D)
 

JoeCamel

Well-Known Member
I think the placement of Tron really hinders their ability to do much with that space now. Any type of show building would pretty much be visible from Dumbo, Tron, Mad Tea Party, etc. The only option would be either more flat rides or something like Mine Train (not at that scale) but something where the show building is completely hidden by the facade on all sides
They could build something that looks like the ball in front of Mission Space or a themed building to fit in. Make it pretty from all visible points like real Epcot did once upon a time. It doesn't have to look like a show building with a façade.
 

DonniePeverley

Well-Known Member
I have road this a few times, during the day the astethics are no where near as spectacular as at night (IMO). It is aesthetically beautiful at night! But the coaster itself is very meh in my opinion. I do like the novelty of the lightcycle trains but the attraction is really short. I also don't really pickup on any story once you leave the preshow, which by the way, the reveal is really cool. Having been on it, I don't feel compelled to ever wait in line for this attraction after it opens unless for some strange reason its less than a 30 minute wait.

that's a tad deflating
 

Patcheslee

Well-Known Member
But kids love it, and it could be great with a serious upgrade, and fit right in with TRON.
Mines 14 and doesn't want to do them because she doesn't want to bump someone. She takes that a bit too seriously lol. If upgraded they could add a stop proximity sensor maybe.
 

Dr.GrantSeeker

Well-Known Member
In my opinion adding attractions to the Magic Kingdom is always the right decision.

People may argue that it will only make the park more crowded.

I say the new attraction will be there long after the hype is over and can absorb guests in the most visited park in the world.
Do we know what the capacity of this attraction is? I would bet someone does assuming it is identical to the capacity of its twin sister over in SHDL.
 

No Name

Well-Known Member
There’s actually one difference between the coaster building in Shanghai and Florida, and it’s this part:
8C0378F6-A739-4ED0-870D-209AF54869A4.jpeg


That doesn’t stick out in Shanghai, but it does here, and that’s why it’s frequently in view:
1E4E200E-6217-4D17-AF7D-EAB58B08A3F2.jpeg


I am curious why this difference exists. I’m sure it’s something pertaining to US law but they should’ve changed the shape of the canopy to work correctly.
 

JoeCamel

Well-Known Member
There’s actually one difference between the coaster building in Shanghai and Florida, and it’s this part:
View attachment 701768

That doesn’t stick out in Shanghai, but it does here, and that’s why it’s frequently in view:
View attachment 701769

I am curious why this difference exists. I’m sure it’s something pertaining to US law but they should’ve changed the shape of the canopy to work correctly.
Being able to replicate the canopy was probably a driving factor of why it was greenlit, you can build a box anywhere. I would guess fire codes for the building change meaning it required access where China does not.
 

Timothy_Q

Well-Known Member
There’s actually one difference between the coaster building in Shanghai and Florida, and it’s this part:
View attachment 701768

That doesn’t stick out in Shanghai, but it does here, and that’s why it’s frequently in view:
View attachment 701769

I am curious why this difference exists. I’m sure it’s something pertaining to US law but they should’ve changed the shape of the canopy to work correctly.
That little extra corner poking out from the behind the canopy is such bad design

They could've at least made it follow the same curve of the canopy so it wouldn't draw so much attention
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom