News Tron coaster coming to the Magic Kingdom

BubbaisSleep

Well-Known Member
It is an exact replica of Singapore. With that said, the "Copy and Paste" tag is being used to discredit what many people consider to be an amazing attraction. Like I said, it is still a unique attraction unless you've been on the Singapore Tron ride, which is very few and far between. Thats my point.
I have to agree. The length & construction time complaints I understand but using copy & paste to discount people’s excitement? Most of us aren’t going to Shanghai anytime soon. Outside of Tomorrowland, Magic Kingdom itself is pretty much a less-charming copy & paste of another park so what is the problem? Does that mean the much weaker version of POTC is also discounted as an imagineering marvel & guests who will probably never visit DLR or DLP shouldn’t be amazed by it?
 

Jrb1979

Well-Known Member
It is an exact replica of Singapore. With that said, the "Copy and Paste" tag is being used to discredit what many people consider to be an amazing attraction. Like I said, it is still a unique attraction unless you've been on the Singapore Tron ride, which is very few and far between. Thats my point.
I would agree with it being unique if not for the fact a better motorcycle coaster is at the park down the road
 

ChrisFL

Premium Member
Tron Legacy grossed $400 million during its worldwide theatrical run against a $170 million production budget.....that does not include the marketing budget I don't think, so it probably did more than break even and probably made some merchandise sales.

Also, it's a super easy concept to understand, so people don't need to have watched the movie to fully comprehend what's going on.
 

No Name

Well-Known Member
Tron Legacy grossed $400 million during its worldwide theatrical run against a $170 million production budget.....that does not include the marketing budget I don't think, so it probably did more than break even and probably made some merchandise sales.

Also, it's a super easy concept to understand, so people don't need to have watched the movie to fully comprehend what's going on.
$400 million in box office means Disney probably made around $200 million in revenue, so unless they spent $30 million or less in marketing (they didn’t), it was a loss.

And I don’t think the ride makes it particularly clear that you’re trying to avoid crashing into some opponent lightcycle. But it’s not like it’s following either movie very closely, as the canopy isn’t remotely similar to the look of either movie.
 
Last edited:

celluloid

Well-Known Member
$400 million in box office means Disney probably made around $200 million in revenue, so unless they spent $30 million or less in marketing (they didn’t), it was a loss.

Like many other properties we are stuck with post Disney Decade, it is about a mix of Iger's love for Synergy, his hubris and merch.

Tron Legacy stomped the crap out of Princess and The Frog Box office and merch and aesthetic stuck around.
 

No Name

Well-Known Member
Like many other properties we are stuck with post Disney Decade, it is about a mix of Iger's love for Synergy, his hubris and merch.

Tron Legacy stomped the crap out of Princess and The Frog Box office and merch and aesthetic stuck around.
Relative to their respective budgets, they were both similarly unprofitable.
 

Coaster Lover

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
No
It is unreal that from launch to tunnel to unload ride time is less than a minute.

The video POV launches at 31 seconds and after the unload tunnel light show is over.

Even if you do not count the initial dip and speed tunnel of space mountain and only start at the top of the chainhill, Space Mountain is longer.
It's almost identical in length to Rock N Rollercoaster but yet few complain about that being too short... weird...
 

celluloid

Well-Known Member
It's almost identical in length to Rock N Rollercoaster but yet few complain about that being too short... weird...

RnR was built in 1998 and opened in 1999. Over two decades ago, and only 5 years after the world's most amazing and known thrill ride opened directly across from it. Launches for coasters of that speed were still in infancy, onboard audio of that caliber had never been done, it only has one actual slow down block break whereas Tron has them frequently in its short journey and the thing is completely indoors with multiple inversions. Disney had also just opened a brand-new theme park on their property a year prior, the biggest theme park they had ever built before. Not to mention the numerous projects and new attractions around the rest of the resort.

Tron is the first new ground up attraction in MK in a very long time. It was built next to the most famous and iconic indoor rollercoaster on the planet that will be going on 50 years old soon. Disney's other biggest newest project is an indoor coaster at EPCOT that has a better level of theming, length and more lauded unique qualities.

Their biggest competitors have all recently built or are building launched themed coasters that are lengthier and arguably more interesting. They have also been completed much faster.

The ride is lackluster for the industry standard by most accounts, especially the standards of the resort it was built in.
 
Last edited:

doctornick

Well-Known Member
It's almost identical in length to Rock N Rollercoaster but yet few complain about that being too short... weird...

Yeah, I'm not sure I get that Tron is somehow uniquely short among Disney rides with RNR around. They seem remarkably similar in terms of ride experience but Tron looks much more interesting in terms of theming/visuals.
 

No Name

Well-Known Member
It's almost identical in length to Rock N Rollercoaster but yet few complain about that being too short... weird...
RnRC doesn’t have four brake runs. It doesn’t enter a building partway through, turn twice, brake, turn twice, brake, turn twice, break and that’s it. Tron feels like it finishes without ever truly getting started. Something can feel much shorter because of the way it’s designed and that’s the case with the Tron coaster.

“I can’t fit in the tron seat”
Fun fact, the average American adult weighs 34 pounds more than the average adult in China! I’m thinking the problem isn’t with the restraints…
 

Tom P.

Well-Known Member
Tron: Legacy was fun. I saw it in the theater in its original run and enjoyed it. But it's far from being a beloved classic or even a cult classic. When you hear it mentioned, if people know it, the most common thing you hear praised is its soundtrack (and rightly so). But that's about it. From a visual standpoint, they did a few impressive things, but there's nothing amazingly innovative or different about it's aesthetic. It's a good CGI flick and it looks like a good CGI flick.

The original Tron, however, was the groundbreaking one. It is absolutely a cult classic. It has a visual style that was never done before or since. No other movie in history has ever been made using those techniques, many of which were literally invented for the film. Even today, with all the modern CGI eye candy that we are used to, it is visually striking. Not to mention the performances in it from the actors are wonderful and the score is beautiful as well.

In short, I think Disney has made a mistake here by focusing entirely on Legacy and not at all on the original. I know that the Hollywood mindset is always that "new is better" and, also, Legacy was made during the Iger years. But I think a ride that was based on the style of the original, or at least had some elements of both films, would have been a better choice.
 

J4546

Well-Known Member
I don't think this is an exact copy like many people here said, it has a much longer ending tunnel to the unload station doesn't it?
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom