• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

News Tron coaster coming to the Magic Kingdom

TwilightZone

Well-Known Member
I decided to pull out the Ol Wikipedia:

Shanghai Disneyland
construction on the castle begins June 29, 2013 - Shanghai opens June 16, 2016
A rough 3 year construction time for tron

Magic Kingdom
December 7 2018 tron construction begins - July 3rd 2022 tron is still under construction

This shouldn't have taken more than 2 years
 

marni1971

Park History nut
Premium Member
I decided to pull out the Ol Wikipedia:

Shanghai Disneyland
construction on the castle begins June 29, 2013 - Shanghai opens June 16, 2016
A rough 3 year construction time for tron

Magic Kingdom
December 7 2018 tron construction begins - July 3rd 2022 tron is still under construction

This shouldn't have taken more than 2 years
Mate, BTM took 20 months. Splash 26 months. Let’s remember groundwork was underway on Tron in summer 2018 for comparison.
 

Touchdown

Well-Known Member
I think the difference between the Nickelodeon coasters (which I’ve heard shockingly high things from) and a ride like Space Mountain or Space Fantasy should be immediately obvious. The Nickelodeon coasters are more climate controlled (in my view) than indoor. The indoor aspect doesn’t really add anything.

As for there only be two types of coasters, I would have to disagree.

For one, there’s a huge difference between I-box steel track and tubular steel. Additionally, there are hybrid coasters, single-rail coasters, suspended, inverted, dive, hyper, spinning, floor less, launch, etc.
Hey you do you. Coaster enthusiasts pretty much don’t argue over how others rank their coasters, but slicing and dicing them into dozens of categories is just too much for me. RMCs with steel I box tracks are steel coasters, those with wooden tracks are wooden coasters. I personally like just having 2 top ten lists, which for a lot of enthusiasts is 1 too many. But if you do slice and dice you need to qualify it. Guardians, while very fun, is not remotely as good as rides like Veliciocoaster, Millennium Force, Steel Vengeance, Fury 325, SROS NE, etc.
 

SplashJacket

Well-Known Member
Hey you do you. Coaster enthusiasts pretty much don’t argue over how others rank their coasters, but slicing and dicing them into dozens of categories is just too much for me. RMCs with steel I box tracks are steel coasters, those with wooden tracks are wooden coasters. I personally like just having 2 top ten lists, which for a lot of enthusiasts is 1 too many. But if you do slice and dice you need to qualify it. Guardians, while very fun, is not remotely as good as rides like Veliciocoaster, Millennium Force, Steel Vengeance, Fury 325, SROS NE, etc.
I’m not arguing to subdivide coaster rankings into dozens of different categories.

What I’m saying is coasters come in many different styles and people gravitate and prefer those different styles. If you prefer one type of coaster over the others, the best of that coaster type could be the world’s best coaster to you.

Guardians could very reasonably be the best in the world in its specific style, and therefore, could be the overall best coaster in the world to a lot of people who prefer that style.
 

Jrb1979

Well-Known Member
I’m not arguing to subdivide coaster rankings into dozens of different categories.

What I’m saying is coasters come in many different styles and people gravitate and prefer those different styles. If you prefer one type of coaster over the others, the best of that coaster type could be the world’s best coaster to you.

Guardians could very reasonably be the best in the world in its specific style, and therefore, could be the overall best coaster in the world to a lot of people who prefer that style.
Since we are getting into this discussion IMO people that believe Guardians is the best coaster probably don't visit other parks much or don't do big coasters. For me if it lacks high G forces it's just a fun coaster but not work a bunch of re-rides.
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
Since we are getting into this discussion IMO people that believe Guardians is the best coaster probably don't visit other parks much or don't do big coasters. For me if it lacks high G forces it's just a fun coaster but not work a bunch of re-rides.
Thank-you for correcting what people like!!
 

Touchdown

Well-Known Member
I’m not arguing to subdivide coaster rankings into dozens of different categories.

What I’m saying is coasters come in many different styles and people gravitate and prefer those different styles. If you prefer one type of coaster over the others, the best of that coaster type could be the world’s best coaster to you.

Guardians could very reasonably be the best in the world in its specific style, and therefore, could be the overall best coaster in the world to a lot of people who prefer that style.
Let me know when Guardians gets on a best coasters in the world list or even one in America. It’s not even in the top 5 in Orlando. Heck personally it’s not even the best indoor roller coaster in Orlando (The Mummy.). It is however the best roller coaster to ever been built in Epcot.

It’s also not going to win the Golden Ticket for best new coaster this year either. Your statements go against the general concencus of the enthusiast community. That’s fine for you to have that opinion but it’s not right to extrapolate it out that it’s a majority consensus.
 

bhg469

Well-Known Member
Let me know when Guardians gets on a best coasters in the world list or even one in America. It’s not even in the top 5 in Orlando. Heck personally it’s not even the best indoor roller coaster in Orlando (The Mummy.). It is however the best roller coaster to ever been built in Epcot.

It’s also not going to win the Golden Ticket for best new coaster this year either. Your statements go against the general concencus of the enthusiast community. That’s fine for you to have that opinion but it’s not right to extrapolate it out that it’s a majority consensus.
You know what? You make a very good point. I rode it again today and if we are comparing indoor coasters... Especially one with a "theme" mummy may be just as good.. it's a little more intense, scenes are just as good if not better and the surprise ending is still one of the coolest surprises in any attraction.
 

TrainsOfDisney

Well-Known Member
You know what? You make a very good point. I rode it again today and if we are comparing indoor coasters... Especially one with a "theme" mummy may be just as good.. it's a little more intense, scenes are just as good if not better and the surprise ending is still one of the coolest surprises in any attraction.
I always enjoy physical effects vs. digital. The fire effects alone make Mummy the best vs. all projections - plus the coaster portions are quite fun and exciting without being crazy intense.

*fairness - I haven’t ridden guardians yet*
 

bhg469

Well-Known Member
I always enjoy physical effects vs. digital. The fire effects alone make Mummy the best vs. all projections - plus the coaster portions are quite fun and exciting without being crazy intense.

*fairness - I haven’t ridden guardians yet*
I can't think of a way guardians could have an opportunity for more physical sets. The physical elements that you do see go by in a flash though.
I really enjoyed it and having only ridden it twice it's still shiny and new. Truthfully I've only ridden Hagrids once, and maybe I would enjoy that less if I rode it more, I don't think so though.

In the queue today my wife brought up hyperspace mountain.. and I thought this is hyperspace mountain with a super fancy ride vehicle.. while that oversimplifies it, it's not far from the truth... I LOVE hyperspace mountain though...
 

Rteetz

Well-Known Member
I've been in it twice and you know how I know it's not a good coaster? Because I like it. No drops and no airtime is what coaster fans dislike. As someone who hates those things it's my kind of ride.
It’s not the most thrilling coaster but not every coaster has to be. My question tho was to prove that @Jrb1979 is jumping to conclusions without having actually being on it.
 

Jrb1979

Well-Known Member
It’s not the most thrilling coaster but not every coaster has to be. My question tho was to prove that @Jrb1979 is jumping to conclusions without having actually being on it.
My point wasn't to say it's not thrilling of that it has to be. My point was in regards to the PP saying it's the best coaster out there. It looks like a fun coaster and great fit for Disney.
 

Rteetz

Well-Known Member
My point wasn't to say it's not thrilling of that it has to be. My point was in regards to the PP saying it's the best coaster out there. It looks like a fun coaster and great fit for Disney.
That’s their opinion, people are entitled to such. We know you’re anti-themed and anti-disney coaster. That’s fine. I wouldn’t declare it the best coaster on earth but who cares if someone else does?

You also shouldn’t necessarily jump to conclusions if you have not been on said coaster.
 

UpAllNight

Well-Known Member
Disney have a decent lineup of coasters for their demographic, but in the way Velocicoaster was a smash for Universal & their demographic, the long discussed coaster for Dinoland would have been for AK too.

Some things aren't rocket science. Dinosaurs = cool. Coasters = fun. Add the 2, and bam. One of the best theme park combos possible. Disney have missed a trick, but I suspect it's not too late. An airtime filled woody with twists and banks - sure hit.

Tron will go down a treat, but I feel the placement next to Space Mountain is just a bit strange. Compared to Disneyland, which has a lot more dark rides (incl Rise, soon Mickey, Indiana Jones). It was possibly just the easy route when the park needed a bit of something else. But it will still be a hit. If Disney added at pace it's maybe not an issue, but the last big ride at MK was like 30 years ago, so that adds to the miss factor.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom