The ride, or an illuminated canopy?
Fair enough. I guess I just have a hard time seeing how they’ll manage to cover up a show building that large and exposed. And frankly how they’ve handled the guardians show building doesn’t give me much confidence.Ummm.
1. Entirely subjective. While the project has exceeded my expectations a lot was lost aesthetically. Just not the same magic as before when the land is viewed from across the lake. But they reimagined the land effectively and credit where credit is due. I would agree if Tron had a coaster track section towering over the project. Therefore Tron looks much better.
And 2. Everyone is assuming the view from FL is the final product. Considering the pains they went through to hide an almost imperceptible corner of the mermaid show building, such assumptions seem unwarrented. IMO.
Fair enough, you askedTrying to help destroy the English languagehonestly im on my phone and dont put too much emphasis on it. It amazes me when people say they can't easily read this or that. (Like how so many people freak over the versions of there) the sentence structure itself will tell you what they mean. The human brain can read entire paragraphs that are spelled wrong. Grammar was never my strong point dont worry no degrees here
Not really in any kind of rage ? Just don't see too much merit in your arguments. Its a lazy copy paste job in a park that to be frank needs the least attention attraction wise based on an IP nobody cares about.
But sorry for misconstruing my words into some kind of "rage"
Good day to you kind sir or madame.
I don’t disagree that Tron will be beautiful or that Tomorrowland greatly needs something like it because it does. But that show building is massive and it’ll take a lot more than a berm and some trees to cover it up. Admittedly I should withhold my full judgement until it’s complete. But after how Disney handled the Guardians show building and even the Ratatouille one, forgive me if I’m skeptical.
"Beautiful" Nah! But agree with the rest.
Not fair enough. It’s his usual baseless bullocks. The site plan for the project has been published. We know what they’re doing.
True every one that can read knows what they're doing. The question is do "they"?
Again, where would the trees be placed?
Right next to the trees that are already there?
Those trees are on the sloping banks of the retention pond. You’d have to replace them to make more room.
Fair enough, you asked
And I addressed all your points. The answer of course is 'Yes' some people will think "Yes" as it's all subjective. To be honest though I don't think you really wanted a debate but were merely saying you don't like it.
I take it that it's not the first time your Grammar has been picked up on?
And a very good day to you too
recent decisions. However i voice my opinion because i legitimately care. The same passion that i will bash Busch gardens for not opening iron gwazi etc.
I have heard from a reliable source that the parks are never finished.
Could that not be done?
Under the merry go round
It’s the sort of thing that would have made more sense when the tracks were ripped up so you could bring in larger trees and equipment. It’s also a rather narrow patch of land that you’d probably want to be more sizable to better accommodate larger trees.
Though it might be better than nothing, planting super tall trees to block the building from the monorail view (or views from around the resorts and lagoon) would essentially create the same problem of diminishing scale. Similar situation for the coaster at Epcot from across the lake. It would be nice if they blocked a few views like the one from Storybook Circus, but they can’t do much about 90% of the other views.
