I can't argue that it's probably the weakest Disney park I've been to, even though I went to DCA when it was the better incarnation before they dropped the Pixar bomb on the place.
That being said, it's still good, it just needs "better".They're moving in the right direction, no doubt. However, it's still hamstrung by underinvestment, or perhaps "misguided investment" is a better way to phrase it. Better spending coupled with a better vision is what could make it a great park. Kind of like the amount of money they've spent on Epcot - They've spent far too much and gotten far too little from it, and it feels like that's the exact same direction they are taking with WDSP. That is also part of a larger problem of the Iger era - spending a boatload of money but building these insipid "mini-lands" with a fraction of what it actually needed. The Rat area is fantastic and was very well done, but it has one ride (But, maybe it doesn't need more and they need to do more elsewhere). Examples at WDW: The Fantasyland expansion needs more. GE looks good but it needs more. TSL ... no need to beat that dead horse. Everything is underbuilt and feels incomplete, or else things get an obscene amount of money and the result is underwhelming. Under the Bob's, "good enough" suffices when "better" needs to be their floor, not their ceiling.
. 
