DinoInstitute
Well-Known Member
And with no height requirements.When what the park needs most is capacity the better option would've been a Fantasyland like area with plenty more to do. Think Disneyland.
And with no height requirements.When what the park needs most is capacity the better option would've been a Fantasyland like area with plenty more to do. Think Disneyland.
The cool thing about the board game is, that rooftop theming would have been visible only from that high curve on the Slinky coaster. So it would have been a neat "Ah-ha!" moment. In a land that seems not to have been cared about much, it would have been a nice extra for the guests. Oh well. To be fair, given that just about every project is going to get cuts somewhere, I'm guessing whoever put this in knew it was going to be cut.Ah, yes I knew the SLinky Dog coaster was shortened with a lot of the Misc theming removed, but what was that board game looking structure supposed to be, no a third attraction? Even from its inception this was a 2 ride expansion, with TSMM flipping entrances.
It is and it is not.
But believe your own spin. Why change a habit.
I remember the same fretting when mine train got scaled back but that provided some as yet realized benefits while still managing to become one of the number 1 attractions at the most popular theme park in the world. And for those requiring more thrills BTMRR has that covered.
Most here are rationalizing a problem where none exists.
You are wrong. Again.I love when you admit I am right in your way.
Guess what? If it happens it would be a rollercoaster called Twilight Zone at Six Flags. It won't, but if you'd prefer that okay
You are pushing it a little bit on this one.... Ride is a good ride great theming but it could have been so much better and should have been.. The budget cut on this ride cost it from being one of the best on all disney parks to just a good solid ride.
You are wrong. Again.
You really are a fruitcake
I agree with what you said about simpsons. I actually think it's a notch above as we're getting a spinner and coaster. However, to use an 11 acre or so plot for JUST flat rides is pretty disappointing.This land looks like it's going to be on par with the Simpsons area which I personally enjoy. It's nothing special, it's basic theming and adds a B and C ticket attraction to the lineup.
This would be fine if the other additions (beyond Star Wars) were true additions and not replacements.
The first version looks very nice. Hopefully it will end up that way.
I agree with what you said about simpsons. I actually think it's a notch above as we're getting a spinner and coaster. However, to use an 11 acre or so plot for JUST flat rides is pretty disappointing.
Yes, there is a certain smell...Martin resorts to name calling.
I must be on the scent.
You constantly manage to prove yourself time and time again don't you? As I often say I'm so glad you're still around.I really do not see the problem here..
Yes, there is a certain smell...
You constantly manage to prove yourself time and time again don't you? As I often say I'm so glad you're still around.
Not quite. We call it muck spreading.Disney Dollars?.
I'm not denying that the park needs added capacity, but I'm less concerned with critiquing one of the actual additions than I am with replacements to existing areas.When what the park needs most is capacity the better option would've been a Fantasyland like area with plenty more to do. Think Disneyland.
Or just relentlessly annoying with your own made up reality.Martin resorts to name calling.
I must be on the scent.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.