Chalk up progress at leastLet's just say it's taken two years to get this far.
That's slow.
If you are referring to the backlot tour, that thing died years ago. All they did was take it out of the lineup. It was more depressing then fun at that point. All that is, is just a talking point. That area was just sad, operating or not. How long they take to start a project is of no relevance. Nothing had been announced, no one was gnawing at the bit in anticipation of the specific thing that would replace it. They probably knew that CC was in serious need of work, and also knew that extensive expenditures to bring it back to life only to replace it a year later would be something that would be a source of complaints about how they could have used that money for something instead of just patching it up. Look how upset people got about the different front at Norway.Or maybe we just don't expect an attraction to close over a year before they actually start work on its replacement.
how long it took to replace 20K and that was during the golden years that everyone speaks about.
They did have two aborted attempts at that. Though the late 90s were not the golden age.
They did have two aborted attempts at that. Though the late 90s were not the golden age.
I would call the late 80's the Golden Age for Epcot. The late 90's was the clear beginning of the downfall into the mess.It was for Epcot at least.
It started going downhill when they opened D-MGM.I would call the late 80's the Golden Age for Epcot. The late 90's was the clear beginning of the downfall into the mess.
I would call the late 80's the Golden Age for Epcot. The late 90's was the clear beginning of the downfall into the mess.
If you are referring to the backlot tour, that thing died years ago. All they did was take it out of the lineup. It was more depressing then fun at that point. All that is, is just a talking point. That area was just sad, operating or not. How long they take to start a project is of no relevance. Nothing had been announced, no one was gnawing at the bit in anticipation of the specific thing that would replace it. They probably knew that CC was in serious need of work, and also knew that extensive expenditures to bring it back to life only to replace it a year later would be something that would be a source of complaints about how they could have used that money for something instead of just patching it up. Look how upset people got about the different front at Norway.
What right do we have in expecting anything that hasn't been promised. They never said when it would happen, everyone just guessed. Choose a number, one would have been just as correct as the other. They have a long way to go to match how long it took to replace 20K and that was during the golden years that everyone speaks about.
Epcot at it's primeThat's true. I would call 89-93 the golden years... But horizons didn't close till 99'
And closes to classic attractions starting in the mid 90'sIt started going downhill when they opened D-MGM.
Like I said 1989-1993. Truly the golden years.And closes to classic attractions starting in the mid 90's
Hardly.It was for Epcot at least.
Horizons closed in 1994. They were forced to reopen it "seasonally" with no upkeep after that.That's true. I would call 89-93 the golden years... But horizons didn't close till 99'
"You don't know what you got till it's gone.""The Golden Age was never the current age, Mr. Twain."
But it was still "technically" open. But even if, 89-93Horizons closed in 1994. They were forced to reopen it "seasonally" with no upkeep after that.
It was a mess! So sad. GE pulled out after ten years and once Eisner decreed Disney wouldn't pay for the planned refurb they let it rot.But it was still "technically" open. But even if, 89-93
Sometimes it is the current age though. Like right now with Universal - it's undeniable we are in their Golden years. How long they last is TBD."The Golden Age was never the current age, Mr. Twain."
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.