Animaniac93-98
Well-Known Member
"It's so old it's falling apart! Since safety is our #1 concern for our guests, we have decided to retire this classic attraction."
- Bob
- Bob
o.0"It's so old it's falling apart! Since safety is our #1 concern for our guests, we have decided to retire this classic attraction."
- Bob
JMHO, but to me the obvious answer is usually the correct one. All that '94 crap sucks. Make it look clean and retro for the next generationJust wondering why would Disney Parks shell out money to switch these out...
I know theming reasons and all that... but could there be another component as to why these are being switched out?
The ones that they are being replaced seem to have "parts" that if something went wrong, might fall off and injure someone below... The new version, not so much...
Are the lawyers for the parks asking that anything above guests heads be constructed to a structurally higher standard today than in years past?
Yea, I get it, and I am glad to see the willingness to do more in the name of theme. It seems like a lot of money just to make something that once was an acceptable look, look better. Structure replacement will cost a bit more than paint!JMHO, but to me the obvious answer is usually the correct one. All that '94 crap sucks. Make it look clean and retro for the next generation
Photo update as of Wednesday, February 5, 2020. A November 2019 post mentioned that Mickey's Star Traders in Tomorrowland had changed to just "Star Traders," which is correct. The futuristic ("Flash Gordon" style) wall murals inside Star Traders has been covered by a cloth overlay. See photos below. (My apologies if this has been noted before.)
View attachment 447125
View attachment 447126
Meh. It's a vacuum-formed plastic sign. Not all that impressive in the sign world, to be honest. It does look nice though. I'd love to see them play with clear, laser-cut acrylic and edge-lighting somewhere...the visual effect is awesome because only the cut edges of the acrylic catch and enhance the light, so it looks like it's just light floating in the middle of nothing.Oh man, that new sign is gorgeous. I noticed they also got rid of the Mickey-shaped "planet" that the other lights used to surround.
Meh. It's a vacuum-formed plastic sign. Not all that impressive in the sign world, to be honest. It does look nice though. I'd love to see them play with clear, laser-cut acrylic and edge-lighting somewhere...the visual effect is awesome because only the cut edges of the acrylic catch and enhance the light, so it looks like it's just light floating in the middle of nothing.
Agreed on the font and colors! (Sorry...it's basically in my nature to consider materials and quality of construction to be as high on the priority list as design.)I more meant the design of the sign than the construction of it. I'm a huge fan of that font and color choice.
It looks like it's been there since 1975 in the best way.
They are simply switching them to change the aesthetic (I don't consider it theming). There is nothing more structurally sound about the "new" column facades - or if there is, it's rather negligible.Just wondering why would Disney Parks shell out money to switch these out...
I know theming reasons and all that... but could there be another component as to why these are being switched out?
The ones that they are being replaced seem to have "parts" that if something went wrong, might fall off and injure someone below... The new version, not so much...
Are the lawyers for the parks asking that anything above guests heads be constructed to a structurally higher standard today than in years past?
I'm pretty sure this question was answered back when they painted the rockets teal and added color to the rocket tower structure. AO was my favorite visual update from TL94 and I hope it remains mostly unchanged.So with TL reverting to pre 94 theming...what's to become of the Buck Roger's themed Astro Orbiter with the colorful planets and rockets? It doesn't seem to fit the aesthetic they are heading towards. Do you think it will be rethemed to match? Just wondering.
It should remain mostly unchanged.I'm pretty sure this question was answered back when they painted the rockets teal and added color to the rocket tower structure. AO was my favorite visual update from TL94 and I hope it remains mostly unchanged.
It should remain mostly unchanged.
A Saturn V may be a little too retro?I'd rather it go back to it's fabulous original scheme. '94 Tomorrowland has always looked to me, mostly, like something between Sonic the Hedgehog and a sticky playset at daycare. Unsophisticated. Granted, I guess the original could look like a playset, too. Oh well.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.