Mike S
Well-Known Member
Now I have to think of a prize for him. Great lol.Winner winner
Now I have to think of a prize for him. Great lol.Winner winner
Too much of what I was told about this attraction's development was incorrect for me to run a victory lap and claim to have been right about much. Sadly these sorts of failures were entirely expected. Though I'm somewhat surprised it was THIS quick. While I did make that comment and did expect the normal "giving up" to occur not long after the ride opened, even I thought that short timeline was a bit too pessimistic. In truth, I had believed that they might at least take better care of the ride for the first year or two while it was under the public's scrutiny. But it goes to show how beyond the pale the TWDC and Orlando management really is.@MerlinTheGoat needs to change his name to NostradamusTheGoat
The ride is still a massive disappointment even when everything is functioning correctly. A large number of people here were tearing it apart when it first opened and was 100% fresh. Sorry...I think it’s more that some are using this as an excuse or some form of justification to say that they always knew it would end up like this because they didn’t like the idea of the retheme to begin with. I like the ride and hope they deal with and fix the problems, but using this as an “I told you so” does not feel genuine.
Joking aside, it's worth noting (because some posters continue to imply otherwise) that there is no requirement in this forum to like the new attraction, much less praise it.As the steel gate closes behind me, I breath the fresh air of freedom from wdwmagic forums jail.
I vow never to mention the name of the previous attraction that is now home to our wonderful, beautiful, glorious Tiana.
Please get well soon Tiana, as we want to experience this wonderful, beautiful, glorious attraction.
My dream someday is that the standby to this wonderful, beautiful, glorious attraction is open so all who wish to wait can enjoy this wonderful, beautiful, glorious attraction.
View attachment 806654
As always @LittleBuford , thanks for the constant and continuing corrections.Joking aside, it's worth noting (because some posters continue to imply otherwise) that there is no requirement in this forum to like the new attraction, much less praise it.
As always @LittleBuford , thanks for the constant and continuing corrections.
As for our wonderful, glorious, beautiful Tiana that has replaced the attraction that will not be mentioned, our wonderful, glorious, beautiful Tiana will be there for the unforeseen future, probably decades.
Disney needs to fix it.
If they need to close it and put walls back up to do it, they should.
My hope is they can learn from whatever is happening in WDW so that DLR's Tiana can be built correctly and will will work reliably. I am sad that WDW became the Beta (maybe Alpha) site for Tiana.
I will remind folks how very bad the very first launch of TestTrack was! It was mostly down.
No-one has said or implied otherwise. Again, it's one of the rare points on which everyone here can agree.Disney needs to fix it.
I do recall several people bringing it up as a factor in favour of the retheme, though not necessarily as a reason in itself.Am I the only person who doesn't remember many people supporting replacing Splash due to its poor maintenance? I remember a lot of people commenting on the poor condition even before Tiana was announced, others accepting the reasons behind the replacement, and yet others just willing to give the project the benefit of the doubt. The bad upkeep of the ride would seem a weird reason to promote this change, though, as there was every indication the same problem would just recur.
I'm kind of surprised about this gloating because I think everyone recognises this ride has had a terrible roll-out and, if anyone was arguing Splash mountain should be replaced because of poor maintenance, they were very few.
I’m just disappointed. I really wanted this to be good, and for it to come together like mission breakout did. Wasted, wasted potential.I do recall several people bringing it up as a factor in favour of the retheme, though not necessarily as a reason in itself.
But yes, I agree with you that the gloating seems strangely misplaced.
We don't know the true motives of Disney, personally I thought the retheme was indeed really done to change out old hardware/technology, to save costs in the long run because the old hardware/tech was getting too expensive in time and money to maintain; no spare parts, replacement parts need to be custom made, etc.Am I the only person who doesn't remember many people supporting replacing Splash due to its poor maintenance? I remember a lot of people commenting on the poor condition even before Tiana was announced, others accepting the reasons behind the replacement, and yet others just willing to give the project the benefit of the doubt. The bad upkeep of the ride would seem a weird reason to promote this change, though, as there was every indication the same problem would just recur.
I'm kind of surprised about this gloating because I think everyone recognises this ride has had a terrible roll-out and, if anyone was arguing Splash mountain should be replaced because of poor maintenance, they were very few.
Yes, I was hoping it would turn out well even if the early signs were a bit worrying.I’m just disappointed. I really wanted this to be good, and for it to come together like mission breakout did. Wasted, wasted potential.
Fair enough. I guess some were predicting such failures this early on. I still find it surprising that so much of the ride is so consistently down so early in its life. I don't think we've seen anything quite this bad before, but perhaps I'm mistaken.
Yes.Yes, I was hoping it would turn out well even if the early signs were a bit worrying.
Beyond the maintenance issues, the more I think about the storyline of the new ride, the more I am struck but how paper thin and kind of strange that it is for such a long ride. That is only reinforced by so much of the staging being small groups of animals playing instruments while Tiana and Luis look on and say things like "they sure can play!" Considering the time and money that goes into these things, I'm surprised no-one pushed them to be more ambitious with it.
This is why I don’t agree with the sentiment that these technical issues should cause Disney to be more cautious about embarking on future projects. Yes, they need to learn lessons from this, but playing it safe isn’t the answer.I'm nervous that the animatronics not working will probably just convince the higher-ups at Disney that they shouldn't have animatronics in their new attractions at all. I honestly wouldn't be surprised if that's what they "learned" from this.
Seeing Epic Universe? Nah they have a LOT to compete with now, especially in terms of high quality animatronics.I'm nervous that the animatronics not working will probably just convince the higher-ups at Disney that they shouldn't have animatronics in their new attractions at all. I honestly wouldn't be surprised if that's what they "learned" from this.
I went to WDW a lot in the 70's and 80's and 90's and don't remember attractions being down to the extent they are now. There is no excuse for a new attraction having the extent of technical difficulties TB is having. I have to ask what the heck has changed --unreliable technology, lack of maintenance, unqualified maintenance personnel, or budget cuts
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.