Anything is better than what we have there, I truly mean that.I truly do not care for whatever the announcement for the Imagination pavilion is unless they go for a full restoration of the ride that once was, and should still be.
I do not care for whatever new ideas they would implement instead. Not after this.
I think the general audience will be able to enjoy it at the most surface level, but I can't realistically see this sticking as one of the classics.Yeah I feel bad for Drew also. He seems like a good guy. I know what it feels like to be hyped up for something just to realize it’s not what you hoped.
It’s also possible Drew will like the attraction, not everyone has a high bar for this. If you are just expecting a pointless ride with no story but some good animatronics and a big drop, it might be enjoyable.
Anything would be better, but if they dump millions into something that still ends up being mediocre, we will be stuck with that version for 25 years. As it stands now, it could go anytime. Do it right or don't do it at all.Anything is better than what we have there, I truly mean that.
That being said, IF THEY TOUCH FIGMENT we are gonna have problems.
I have to take a trip every two years. It’s how DVC works.Easy buddy. I thought you were canceling all your trips anyway.
It won't help if the result is the most unambitious and social media-engineered final product possible. Journey Into Your Imagination is an epic fail, but it's a genuine epic fail. They weren't doing cold, lifeless market research to get to that result. It was evil and miscalculated in a genuine way.Anything is better than what we have there, I truly mean that.
That being said, IF THEY TOUCH FIGMENT we are gonna have problems.
When it goes down in January for its annual maintenance, it will come back with a new banner…Tiana’s Bayou Adventure: Under New ManagementWhy at the very least they couldn't figure out there should be no less than a 1 for 1 replacement of AAs is beyond me. Instead, AAs are replaced with ... nothing.
just visually even the photo comparisons are shocking, we will never see that level of detail and artistry again. tba is void of all of it.One of the main problems I have with the whole thing is that you can't just look at the scenes and go "Oh here's how we got from A to B and why" Take the first two indoor show scenes with Louis and Tiana:
View attachment 789054
View attachment 789057
"OK Tiana is listening to music... and listening to music again"
Now compare it to the same scenes in Splash:
View attachment 789058
View attachment 789059"Fox and Bear are clearly bad guys looking to catch Br'er Rabbit. Uh oh they caught Br'er Bear instead!" It was like a Looney Tunes episode brought to life. This new ride is just fluff.
Not actually what I said.So it’s mediocre, a sentiment that the majority of comments both here and on the socials have reflected.
For me, the difference is that very few people and even fewer small children would have been excited to go on a Song of the South ride because they loved the film. The ride was always promoted more on the basis of the 'splash' or drop rather than as a ride through the world of Song of the South and, indeed, the IP was chosen because it suited the ride system rather than the other way around. So, I think most people deciding as to whether they were going to go on the ride were deciding based on whether they wanted to brave the thrill aspect rather than on the basis of the characters.I’ve never bought the argument that Tiana is more appealing to young riders than the cute animals of Splash were. The flume is no less well suited to one theme than the other. I agree with the rest of your post, though.
Agree, and I think the “princess phase” in particular is something that skews towards younger children. Probably most common around age 2-7.For me, the difference is that very few people and even fewer small children would have been excited to go on a Song of the South ride because they loved the film. The ride was always promoted more on the basis of the 'splash' or drop rather than as a ride through the world of Song of the South and, indeed, the IP was chosen because it suited the ride system rather than the other way around. So, I think most people deciding as to whether they were going to go on the ride were deciding based on whether they wanted to brave the thrill aspect rather than on the basis of the characters.
I would imagine Princess and the Frog is different because it is a film that particularly children will likely have a connection and the IP will be a draw in and of itself. For similar reasons, I suspect if there is a thrill element to any Moana ride they eventually build that it will be relatively mild.
Even then, here's one who disliked it:Right…off duty employees are always the height of objectivity
For sure.I’m sure it’ll be better, but the threadbare story will remain an issue.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.