• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

MK Tiana's Bayou Adventure - latest details and construction progress

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sir_Cliff

Well-Known Member
I’ve never bought the argument that Tiana is more appealing to young riders than the cute animals of Splash were. The flume is no less well suited to one theme than the other. I agree with the rest of your post, though.
For me, the difference is that very few people and even fewer small children would have been excited to go on a Song of the South ride because they loved the film. The ride was always promoted more on the basis of the 'splash' or drop rather than as a ride through the world of Song of the South and, indeed, the IP was chosen because it suited the ride system rather than the other way around. So, I think most people deciding as to whether they were going to go on the ride were deciding based on whether they wanted to brave the thrill aspect rather than on the basis of the characters.

I would imagine Princess and the Frog is different because it is a film to which particularly children will likely have a connection and the IP will be a draw in and of itself. For similar reasons, I suspect if there is a thrill element to any Moana ride they eventually build that it will be relatively mild.
 
Last edited:

DisneyHead123

Well-Known Member
For me, the difference is that very few people and even fewer small children would have been excited to go on a Song of the South ride because they loved the film. The ride was always promoted more on the basis of the 'splash' or drop rather than as a ride through the world of Song of the South and, indeed, the IP was chosen because it suited the ride system rather than the other way around. So, I think most people deciding as to whether they were going to go on the ride were deciding based on whether they wanted to brave the thrill aspect rather than on the basis of the characters.

I would imagine Princess and the Frog is different because it is a film that particularly children will likely have a connection and the IP will be a draw in and of itself. For similar reasons, I suspect if there is a thrill element to any Moana ride they eventually build that it will be relatively mild.
Agree, and I think the “princess phase” in particular is something that skews towards younger children. Probably most common around age 2-7.
 

Brian

Well-Known Member
Right…off duty employees are always the height of objectivity
Even then, here's one who disliked it:

comment.png
 

acb27

Member
I for one think the attraction is fantastic. You can tell the plot was written by someone who was actively engaged in exhaustive research (while sampling a cornucopia of adult beverages) in New Orleans. We start by looking for a spice or something in the bayou, but forget about that eventually and turn our attention to finding animals who can play instruments. We find a few of the animals, uh shrink for some reason and find some more of the animals, then go splashy on the waterfall, and realize the spice was inside of us all along. The foregoing, combined with the inclusion of the animal musician animatronics we have all come to know and love, make it an instant classic. I eagerly await the opening of the meet and greet for the fan favorite trumpet beaver and horn playing bear, which meet and greet will no doubt comprise most of the land to be developed as part of the Beyond Big Thunder project.
 

Tha Realest

Well-Known Member
I truly do not care for whatever the announcement for the Imagination pavilion is unless they go for a full restoration of the ride that once was, and should still be.

I do not care for whatever new ideas they would implement instead. Not after this.
With what we’ve seen lately I’d be happy if they don’t touch it until a full WDI housecleaning is complete.
 

Tha Realest

Well-Known Member
Why do we need to go on a bayou adventure to look for musicians? Why couldn’t they just put up some help wanted posters throughout the bayou and call it day? “Need animal musicians - auditions on Saturday”.
You’d think with all those scouting trips to New Orleans they’d have realized there’s a complete embarrassment of riches in terms of New Orleans musicians? Why do they need to go out to the swamps?

That’s like saying you’re in NYC and need to go to CT for good pizza.
 

Surferboy567

Well-Known Member
For sure.
It's still a log flume.
It'll still be fun.
And it's an attractive ride with some good music.
Yeah, in the end the ride system is fun and will continue to be I’ll still ride it and probably get some enjoyment out of it. It’s when we think about what came before we run into problems there are things to enjoy here.

It’s definitely no splash mountain though. Story is almost non-existent as well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom