dreamfinding
Well-Known Member
Out of curiosity, how *bad* is it? Asking because I’m totally unaware.
I’m also deeply saddened that I don’t get to learn more backstory about all the employees of the co-op.The individual "personalities" for the animals do not play into the ride at all. They don't even talk, sing, or have any audio dialogue.
If 1 is ok and 10 is a disaster, I would put it around a 12.Out of curiosity, how *bad* is it? Asking because I’m totally unaware.
I am a Splash fan and have said so multiple times in this and other threads. No-one has ever put me through the wringer for it.Splash fans have been utterly put through the wringer for the past four years. Why? Because they were upset at their favorite ride closing forever. There's been way more praise of Tiana from all sorts of places, including major news outlets and DISfluencers.
It’s funny - the bears that are found in Louisiana are black bears. Maybe that’s why the scenes feel so empty is due to the lack of other bayou animals.I also find it weird how they used to hint at some Splash critters being recycled. I can get past that, but what's weirder is that there are no bird characters at all in the ride. Spoonbills, cranes, turtles, other gators... bayou animals that you'd expect to see in the ride (that were in the movie) are nowhere to be found.
I thought it was funny that it's "Tiana's Foods" and the says "Employee Owned" on the same sign. It's her company...oh no it's not...it's the employee's company.I’m also deeply saddened that I don’t get to learn more backstory about all the employees of the co-op.
I was losing sleep at night thinking about all the wonderful story lines and have been immensely disappointed.
The ride is nowhere near as bad as some would have you believe.Out of curiosity, how *bad* is it? Asking because I’m totally unaware.
I’m not sure why people are surprised. Disney would have very little to gain by closing the comments at this stage. It would only draw more attention to the negative reactions.And the comments are still open!
No, making things up isn’t really something you can just expect people to ‘agree to disagree’ on.Let’s just say we agree to disagree and move on.
I respect your opinion and don’t want to get into it.
This, it’s not bad and no it doesn’t “suck”. It is just not splash mountain and that’s a problem because that’s what it will be endlessly compared to and rightly so.The ride is nowhere near as bad as some would have you believe.
It’s just truly not as good as it should be.
It was painted in around 1930 (interestingly the same time period as Tiana!) and was far from a masterpiece. We’ve ended up with a more interesting and idiosyncratic painting because of its “restoration”. Alas, the same can’t be said of the retheme of Splash.As I watched the side by side POV of old Splash Mountain and the new Tiana’s Bayou Adventure, I kept thinking about the degraded masterpiece from the 1500’s that was “fixed” by a modern day artist.
View attachment 788958
Are you insinuating the bears ate everyone else? LolIt’s funny - the bears that are found in Louisiana are black bears. Maybe that’s why the scenes feel so empty is due to the lack of other bayou animals.
Also, whoever designed those magnolia trees needs to pay a visit to Louisiana/Mississippi.
If you’re replacing a ride seen as the pinnacle of Disney imagineering with something that is “good but not as good as it should be,” you really screwed up.This, it’s not bad and no it doesn’t “suck”. It is just not splash mountain and that’s a problem because that’s what it will be endlessly compared to and rightly so.
Tiana’s is just not Splash Mountain from what I have seen just looks better. Obviously can’t pass judgement till I’ve seen it myself but that’s how it comes across on video.
100% I agree, with most of the criticism. I’ve given plenty of my own. They definitely screwed up.If you’re replacing a ride seen as the pinnacle of Disney inagineering with something that is “good but not as good as it should be,” you really screwed up.
I’ve never bought the argument that Tiana is more appealing to young riders than the cute animals of Splash were. The flume is no less well suited to one theme than the other. I agree with the rest of your post, though.I know this is wading into controversial territory, but...
I agree that this could have worked a lot better if they had of basically listened to Tony Baxter's description of how the plot of the original Splash worked to build up and relieve tension and then designed a PatF story with the same story beats. One of the reasons I think they did not do this is because they wanted this to be a much lighter attraction specifically to appeal to PatF's younger fans.
I know a lot of people will disagree with me, but I really feel that the big drop was more an obstacle or challenge for the designers of this ride rather than a feature because there is no way you would design a PatF-themed attraction from scratch that had such a big thrill element with the potential to scare younger children.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.