News Tiana's Bayou Adventure - latest details and construction progress

MerlinTheGoat

Well-Known Member
Work has certainly begun on the interior but I don’t know how far along it is, either. They’ve been pretty tight-lipped on this. I also don’t understand how DL’s closed 4 months later and will still finish before next Christmas, but I haven’t really followed the conversion there. Maybe it needs less ride-system work.

I was obviously surprised at the lack of progress on DAK/MK headed into Destination D23 but it sounds like Bob has pushed everything back significantly. What will they talk about at D23 next year? More “ideas”?
I don't know much about the state of Disneyland's version, but it may indeed be the case that it needs less work. Prior to its closure, they actually did some maintenance on DL's. At least the animatronics and lighting. Ride system wise i'm less sure about. The MK attraction was in much worse shape when it closed, and the ride system is completely different and a lot more complex (though it did receive a substantial rehab back in 2013). I think MK's is actually classified as something closer to a roller coaster, whereas DL's is more of a traditional log flume.

I do know that DL's version of this Tiana ride is the original vision. MK is a very different layout and had to be adapted after the fact. And perhaps some of those adaptations were a reason why it needed to be closed earlier and perhaps require some additional time. DL's also already takes place in a swampy environment, so perhaps some scenery elements will remain. No clue.

I don't know what Disney was thinking with that wishy washy D23 presentation. The thing is that they ARE allegedly very worried about Epic Universe and are aware that they need to stop behaving like deer in headlights and actually push ambitious new projects. And yet they still don't have any plans for dealing with it. With the DAK/MK plans being just as non-committal as ever, it's clear nothing has been approved and will probably continue to change several more times for several more years before they decide on anything. Or just cancel everything outright. Either way, at this rate Epic will be open long before Disney even breaks ground on anything and is very much expected to substantially tear into at least the non-castle parks...
 

splah

Well-Known Member
There must be some kind of portal/threshold to the magical world of talking animals. do we think the scenery will also change to take us from the stark reality outside into a world where animals talk and play instruments. As the ride become more fantasy will the surrounding become more stylized/hand-drawn (highly stylized flowers in splash) look to contrast with the "reality" outside. it seems like if you keep an intense reality next to animals with cartoon characteristics that could be jarring.
 

yensidtlaw1969

Well-Known Member
Exactly. I find it extremely insulting to the early imagineers to act like details and realism don’t matter at the DL / MK parks.
Who's doing that here though?

Weren't you the one who insisted Water Towers in swampy areas made no sense, only to be shown there's actually a widespread historical precedent for them?

Installing a Water Tower in front of what is meant to be a Salt Mine doesn't even crack the top 10 most egregious assaults on "details and realism" in the western half of MK alone. Placing The Magic Carpets of Aladdin in the Adventureland Plaza is high treason compared to this.
 

yensidtlaw1969

Well-Known Member
There must be some kind of portal/threshold to the magical world of talking animals. do we think the scenery will also change to take us from the stark reality outside into a world where animals talk and play instruments. As the ride become more fantasy will the surrounding become more stylized/hand-drawn (highly stylized flowers in splash) look to contrast with the "reality" outside. it seems like if you keep an intense reality next to animals with cartoon characteristics that could be jarring.
I can't think of any reason why this ride would need any more of a portal or threshold than Splash Mountain had.
 

Epcot81Fan

Well-Known Member
There must be some kind of portal/threshold to the magical world of talking animals. do we think the scenery will also change to take us from the stark reality outside into a world where animals talk and play instruments. As the ride become more fantasy will the surrounding become more stylized/hand-drawn (highly stylized flowers in splash) look to contrast with the "reality" outside. it seems like if you keep an intense reality next to animals with cartoon characteristics that could be jarring.
You have already spent more time thinking about the logic of this attraction than the entire team working on it.

Now, please take your co-op made beignet out of the salt mine crate as you exit.
 

bmr1591

Well-Known Member
Work has certainly begun on the interior but I don’t know how far along it is, either. They’ve been pretty tight-lipped on this. I also don’t understand how DL’s closed 4 months later and will still finish before next Christmas, but I haven’t really followed the conversion there. Maybe it needs less ride-system work.

I was obviously surprised at the lack of progress on DAK/MK headed into Destination D23 but it sounds like Bob has pushed everything back significantly. What will they talk about at D23 next year? More “ideas”?

They may also just be pushing more money into the work at DL to speed up the process. I’m certain WDW would have loved to close Splash at the close of the 50th, but construction contracts and dates have to work out. It was probably cheapest and best for their team to start in January instead of September 2022 or April 2023. For DL, May 2023 put them in their best price and construction efficiency. Just a guess.
 

Vegas Disney Fan

Well-Known Member
I also don’t understand how DL’s closed 4 months later and will still finish before next Christmas, but I haven’t really followed the conversion there. Maybe it needs less ride-system work.
From the outside DLs ride looks several months behind still, they’re still enclosing the tree area, no water tower, no paint, no moss, no mural… I’m not sure if the Christmas date meant both rides because we’re way behind MKs progress on the outside still.

Your easier interior theory may be correct but from the outside I’m doubtful.
 

EagleScout610

These cats can PLAAAAAYYYYY
Premium Member
From the outside DLs ride looks several months behind still, they’re still enclosing the tree area, no water tower, no paint, no moss, no mural… I’m not sure if the Christmas date meant both rides because we’re way behind MKs progress on the outside still.

Your easier interior theory may be correct but from the outside I’m doubtful.
773282-featured.jpg

It seems, at least off the model at D23, that they won't be repainting/rebuilding as much of the rockwork on the mountain as they had to at WDW, since Splash was a redder shade to match Big Thunder next door
 

mickEblu

Well-Known Member
I don't know much about the state of Disneyland's version, but it may indeed be the case that it needs less work. Prior to its closure, they actually did some maintenance on DL's. At least the animatronics and lighting. Ride system wise i'm less sure about. The MK attraction was in much worse shape when it closed, and the ride system is completely different and a lot more complex (though it did receive a substantial rehab back in 2013). I think MK's is actually classified as something closer to a roller coaster, whereas DL's is more of a traditional log flume.

I do know that DL's version of this Tiana ride is the original vision. MK is a very different layout and had to be adapted after the fact. And perhaps some of those adaptations were a reason why it needed to be closed earlier and perhaps require some additional time. DL's also already takes place in a swampy environment, so perhaps some scenery elements will remain. No clue.

I don't know what Disney was thinking with that wishy washy D23 presentation. The thing is that they ARE allegedly very worried about Epic Universe and are aware that they need to stop behaving like deer in headlights and actually push ambitious new projects. And yet they still don't have any plans for dealing with it. With the DAK/MK plans being just as non-committal as ever, it's clear nothing has been approved and will probably continue to change several more times for several more years before they decide on anything. Or just cancel everything outright. Either way, at this rate Epic will be open long before Disney even breaks ground on anything and is very much expected to substantially tear into at least the non-castle parks...

Will Epic Universe’s impact on WDW be as big a deal as people as making it or will it at worst take one extra day away from the mouse from people who are already on Disney World trips? I suspect that Disneys contingency plan is to just make WDW trips more affordable after Epic Universe opens up.
 

splah

Well-Known Member
I can't think of any reason why this ride would need any more of a portal or threshold than Splash Mountain had.
splash's exterior was already stylized with giant briars. we already suspend reality at the exterior. after the first lift and loop around the top that is further conveyed with the critters' homes.

we just saw a 1920s crane and crates be lifted up to that same loop. so they're not using that unseen from the ground space as the start of a transition. it's all still grounded in the reality of manufacturing and industrial equipment.
 

tanc

Premium Member
I wonder what the budget of this project is. If they're potentially releasing early, it makes me wonder if they are meticulously considering every change they make. The pressure is probably on due to not having a queue hog of a ride. I can't even imagine how long the line will be for this when it opens.
 

yensidtlaw1969

Well-Known Member
splash's exterior was already stylized with giant briars. we already suspend reality at the exterior. after the first lift and loop around the top that is further conveyed with the critters' homes.

we just saw a 1920s crane and crates be lifted up to that same loop. so they're not using that unseen from the ground space as the start of a transition. it's all still grounded in the reality of manufacturing and industrial equipment.
Seems like a lot of assumptions being made here.

I don't buy the argument that Splash Mountain's exterior was significantly more stylized than Tiana's Bayou Adventure. Especially when you need only go back one page in this thread to find people complaining that it's somehow too stylized to fit in The Magic Kingdom.
 

splah

Well-Known Member
Seems like a lot of assumptions being made here.

I don't buy the argument that Splash Mountain's exterior was significantly more stylized than Tiana's Bayou Adventure. Especially when you need only go back one page in this thread to find people complaining that it's somehow too stylized to fit in The Magic Kingdom.
I’m not saying splash exterior was a full cartoon. But it hinted at something fantastical and it slowly built more stylized before dropping into the show building.

From the set pieces we’ve seen placed so far it’s all real world things. I’m just wondering how they blend instrument playing animals with a fully grounded in the real world exterior
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom