Guys in my opinion will open the attraction for the beginning of summer 2024, I will go in mid-late July and hope to find it open. It seems to me that the works are well under way, in my opinion it would be illogical to open it after the summer which is the season with the most turnout at the parks. What do you think?
My issue is the creation of a new backstory that has nothing to do with an already excellent film, characters, and song selection.I kind of have to laugh about all this angst about the backstory about an attraction. Did yall have all this angst when you found out about the story/setting of Dinoland USA?
What makes you think this isn’t the narrative for the ride?imagineering of late suffers from a lack of strong "show don't tell" abilities
wouldn't a stronger narrative for a ride be that we're in the bayou ourselves then just happen upon tiana who THEN invites us along on her adventure in progress to help her find the missing ingredient
What makes you think this is the narrative of the ride?vs
we're touring a factory then tianna demands we get in a log to travel the bayou, not even a boat.
What makes you think they’re not doing this?with the former, you could just have a nice bayou/swamp outdoor setting and drop all salt domes, water towers, and factories that are (supposedly) necessary backstory. tiana could still have all that, and be queen of the vertically integrated conglomerate, with details hinted at in the queue or after the ride, but it's not fundamental motivation of the ride. it also frees you up to explore the more magical aspects of the PatF world. by starting the riding at a water tower you are firmly setting the experience in the "real world" which will be thematically at odds with the magic we're surely going to witness.
Dinoland has a backstory?I kind of have to laugh about all this angst about the backstory about an attraction. Did yall have all this angst when you found out about the story/setting of Dinoland USA?
answer to all - because we start our journey at the water tower that says tiana's foods. and have this gobbledygook of a sign saying we're at their corporate locationWhat makes you think this isn’t the narrative for the ride?
What makes you think this is the narrative of the ride?
What makes you think they’re not doing this?
One would hope so.Seems like we should be able to have a conversation without all the snark.
Ok...where were me? Oh....yeah, Tiana.One would hope so.
I wonder if the ride path is even wide enough to do that...Does anybody know if Disney will take the oppertunity to change the logs in Disneyland to be double seating?
That is my issue exactly... I liked the film and characters... I don't need a whole new story into a character that (could have) evolved after story we love... Just like other classic Disney film characters...I don't need a sequel to know what happened afterwards...The idea of being in the bayou and having Dr Facilier send you over the water to the "Other Side" or escaping the "Other Side" over a waterfall sounds like an amazing attraction to me... Ending at Tiana's Palace is great too...but all this gobbledygook they have created does not make sense to me...My issue is the creation of a new backstory that has nothing to do with an already excellent film, characters, and song selection.
Same here. What was wrong with the story of the film. It was great.That is my issue exactly... I liked the film and characters... I don't need a whole new story into a character that (could have) evolved after story we love... Just like other classic Disney film characters...I don't need a sequel to know what happened afterwards...The idea of being in the bayou and having Dr Facilier send you over the water to the "Other Side" or escaping the "Other Side" over a waterfall sounds like an amazing attraction to me... Ending at Tiana's Palace is great too...but all this gobbledygook they have created does not make sense to me...
We know the flat regions could be a bayou, low land swamp..but does the swamp path take you into an actual flooded salt mine? We go "up/down" a salt mine dome and then back to a New Orleans swamp? Maybe there is a magic portal that takes you there and returns you back???That is my issue exactly... I liked the film and characters... I don't need a whole new story into a character that (could have) evolved after story we love... Just like other classic Disney film characters...I don't need a sequel to know what happened afterwards...The idea of being in the bayou and having Dr Facilier send you over the water to the "Other Side" or escaping the "Other Side" over a waterfall sounds like an amazing attraction to me... Ending at Tiana's Palace is great too...but all this gobbledygook they have created does not make sense to me...
Nothing wrong with it, they’re just moving on and telling the next parts of the story.Same here. What was wrong with the story of the film. It was great.
If I was a betting man I'd say both coasts logs are staying as is. Unless they're actually rebuilding the flume for Disneylands. I belive it's too narrow for Disney Worlds style.Ok...where were me? Oh....yeah, Tiana.
For those that don't know. There were two types of logs for Tony Baxter's excellent Splash Mountain ride. Disneyland used a single stack log and and WDW logs were double stacked (side by side seating)
Personally, I liked the WDW side by side seating so you could sit next to your partner. Does anybody know if Disney will take the oppertunity to change the logs in Disneyland to be double seating?
Which seating type is best for TBA?
This is both a) a stretch with regard to your “happens to you” categorization and b) probably not terribly dissimilar from what the new ride experience will be.In Splash Mountain, you had a physical dynamic trip of seeing the characters, and while the story is somewhat passive, it is physically, in the main characters footsteps of the thrill to emotions, both protagonist and antagonist. It was inspired by and had some changes and expansions to the stories known, but not verbatim.
This is both a) a stretch with regard to your “happens to you” categorization and b) probably not terribly dissimilar from what the new ride experience will be.
Really not trying to be critical here. Aren’t we supposed to help Tiana find the missing ingredient? Does that count as how we are part of the ride?Keep reading when you stopped and decided to quote what you quoted. The difference there is the thrill dynamic happens to you. Same way Pirates does. (the original ride this quote happens to you comes from when Imagineers reference people's favorite) The physical dynamic is the storytelling. If you read my post again, you will see nothing has been marketed or in story given, leading us to believe there will be voodoo magic or other story point that explains the thrill pattern and pacing. It could, but nothing released as of yet that makes anyone believe so.
I will make it easy for you. If you read the end, you see I addressed where this could be the case, but not yet:
I have yet to hear how we are a part of this ride's story and how the dynamic of the ride matches the film or our experience. Most posters here can see and have posted the obvious ones. Drops being a result of a voodoo magic good and bad to provide the matching thrill.
So far, all that has been marketed and hyped is touring the food co-op. The richness of story does not mean anything if the ride does not tell a story well.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.