aladdin2007
Well-Known Member
True, I'm aware of that, but even after that someone had stated that was still going to be the main plan for the steamboat room. Lets hope that changed.
-
Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.
News Tiana's Bayou Adventure - latest details and construction progress
- Thread starter wdwmagic
- Start date
MerlinTheGoat
Well-Known Member
Apparently the first hydraulic based audio animatronics introduced around the Worlds Fair era were given numbered designations starting with the letter A and would have single digit numbers ranging from at least 1-5 depending on the size and species of figure. This coming from a quote I found from Wayne Jackson (formerly) of MAPO.
“A1, hydraulic humanoid figures, A2 was animals, A3 was Small World, A5 were your dinosaurs..”
The Oldest Audio-Animatronics in Disneyland — The Disney Classics
The invention of audio animatronics was done by Imagineers in the early Disneyland California days. Some of the oldest audio animatronics are still around today, including animals in the Jungle Cruise, birds in the Enchanted Tiki Room, and pirates in the Pirates of the Caribbean. Learn more about wh
www.thedisneyclassics.com
It should also be noted that like the more modern A100 or A1000 figures, older A1-5 figures could be customized to support more or less motion depending on what was required Which is why for instance the auctioneer in Pirates had more moving parts than some of the other minor pirate figures surrounding him (and those figures also had varying degrees of motion compared to one another). Which goes back to my comment that not every figure in a ride has to be a Hondo, Navi Shaman or Belle with a hundred axes of motion. You can have a large population of AA's that still move, just to a somewhat lesser degree than some of the centerpiece figures.
There's another technology that Disney invented in the 1980s called Compliance. It's a mixture of mostly computer controlled software as well as extra hydraulic actuators, the result of which made even simpler AA's noticeably smoother and less shaky than before. I believe this technology can be (and probably has been) retrofitted into older animatronics, not just A100 and beyond.
When they're in proper working order and haven't been neglected, the America Sings figures are still capable of an impressive degree of fluid motion. Tokyo as you said keeps their attractions in pretty much flawless condition, so you can see what those old figures are truly capable of. And i'm guessing the larger of these figures are based on the old A1 tech. I don't know if they were upgraded with compliance, but it's plausible since they seem able to move quite fast without exhibiting much shaking/jerking.
Tokyo Disneyland's Sinbad ride is probably Disney's most impressive quantity-to-quality ratio in terms of animatronics. That attraction has approximately 140 animatronics. And every single one of those figures has a wide range of fluid motion. It's the last attraction of this kind that Disney built, and they went all out on it.
SuddenStorm
Well-Known Member
And in this case, while considered a Modern Classic DCA's Tower of Terror never hit legendary status like Splash Mountain did.
And though improved in 2012, Paradise Pier is hardly a masterclass in themed design- so while Pixar Pier is a step down, it's not like we lost New Orleans Square for it.
Both versions of Splash are considered to be among the best theme park rides ever built. Modern WDI is going to have to somehow make this the best retheme ever to live up to what was lost.
SuddenStorm
Well-Known Member
Did anyone ever really think this? I can understand some optimism- but I think most of the reception that hasn't been negative is simply 'I like Tiana, therefore more Tiana = good'. I imagine very few people believe that this new ride will be a better use of space than Splash Mountain was, or a net positive for Disneyland or Magic Kingdom.
SuddenStorm
Well-Known Member
I'm shocked a film based on Tomorrowland would be a good fit for a castle style park.
MerlinTheGoat
Well-Known Member
The extent of what I know about the original concept that was planned is that it was extremely low budget (low for Disney standards that is), like in the $30-$40 million range. I believe this version was the "Lost Trumpet" story Jim Hill discussed on his podcast. It would have followed the template of a lot of other modern rides that gutted an existing one, scrapping all of the old animatronics with maybe a small handful of new ones in their place. Like a dozen or so face projected ones like Frozen if you're lucky (maybe even less given that the budget was even lower than Frozen's). A lot of empty black corridors in the dark with a few projections on flat walls.
I am at least confident that the final product will be infinitely better than that. But that standard is literally bottom of the barrel and couldn't get any worse (outside of demolishing the ride and building a bayou spinner or something). The problem is that the standard is STILL Splash Mountain, an attraction that easily stands among Disney's absolute best ever. For this ride to avoid failure, it has to at bare minimum match the quality of Splash Mountain. And despite hearing positive things about the ride and having a source I consider extremely solid, I still struggle to give Disney the benefit of the doubt that they can produce something anywhere close to Splash. They have given us no reason to believe that they're either capable or willing to do so, and it will be the shock of the century if they pull it off.
TheMaxRebo
Well-Known Member
I certainly can understand not giving them the benefit of the doubt.
I am optimistic though as I do think they realize they have to get it right/do a high quality job (as evidenced by the increased budget) and the ride system itself isn't changing and the music from PatF is excellent. Plus, the scenes/animatronics in Splash were in really rough shape - last time I rode it is really detracted from the experience.
So should be the same ride structure with greatly improved animatronics with some great music. Doesn't mean it will be a joke run as if they miss on the story told during the actual ride but the potential is there
As long as people go in with an open mind I think it will be quite enjoyable - but we shall see
MerlinTheGoat
Well-Known Member
The old AA's aren't going to be reused without being extensively refurbished beforehand. This isn't the first time they've been in terrible condition and requiring restoration. They were in even worse shape in 2011-2012, and it took less than 3 months to get them all looking and moving like they were brand new again. Probably far less than that in fact as most of that time went to major cosmetic and ride system repairs to the mountain structure. The AA's probably didn't take long at all to clean up. And for a few years after, they actually did some degree of routine work on the ride and kept the figures functionally reasonably well. Eventually though, they gave up and left the ride to rot, a problem that isn't exclusive to Splash either as other rides on property have had a lot of neglect too. Even their recent ones.
There's no reason why they couldn't restore the figures once again. They'd also probably be more reliable than the newer more complex ones. The thing Disney is allergic to these days is the sort of daily/nightly work they were once famous for that prevents attractions from getting to a poor state in the first place (before a lengthy major refurb is needed for more serious problems).
Tokyo has duplicates of these same AA's, and their Splash opened at the same time as WDW's. It's in perpetually like-new condition however because OLC have zero tolerance for the sort of lackadaisical penny pinching buffoonery that the Disney company pulls on a day to day basis. They maintain their property to a high standard that hasn't existed in America for numerous decades now (probably not since the 70s).
Even if they didn't reuse anything from Splash, that won't prevent rapid deterioration from occurring. The Tiana retheme is in danger of quickly falling into the same state of disrepair as Splash if Disney allows it to. It all depends on how much they care about maintaining it. If they carry over the same exact maintenance policies that Splash and a lot of others have been saddled with for the past 5 years, it's going to be in rough shape all over again within a year or so.
Last edited:
yensidtlaw1969
Well-Known Member
It seems like some posts have been deleted - namely ones that detail new rumors about the Finale.
Assuming those posts were deleted for *other* reasons, could somebody fill us in on what's rumored?
Assuming those posts were deleted for *other* reasons, could somebody fill us in on what's rumored?
MerlinTheGoat
Well-Known Member
Someone linked a couple of tweets from a twitter account claiming that the riverboat in the finale is being demolished and replaced with a facade of Tiana's Palace. And that there would only be 6 animatronics there (new ones of the A1000 variety) replacing the original 26 found in Splash.
I don't know why this post was deleted. Banned source or something? I'm not familiar with the account at all. I won't link to the tweet (which is still up) but the name is splasharchive if i'm still allowed to say that.
Last edited:
Disgruntled Walt
Well-Known Member
- In the Parks
- No
@splasharchive also retweeted a post claiming that the cupofchai poster is telling the truth about four-dozen animatronics. So I think whoever runs this account is putting out mixed messages. I don't really know what to believe at this point. I've been following them for a while and have never seen them post scoops of anything. It's usually just old videos and pictures of construction. So this is strange. AND I have no idea why the posts would be deleted from here.
MerlinTheGoat
Well-Known Member
I don't have any information about what they're doing to the scenery aside from the art they've released, so I can't comment either way on the riverboat's fate. All I can say is that it seems like a really pointless, wasteful and just outright baffling decision to get rid of it. There's literally no good reason, it fits a Tiana ride even better than a Song of the South ride (riverboats are actually prominently featured multiple times in PATF, whereas there aren't actually any in the original SOTS).
The claims about the animatronics from the finale also seem a bit dubious to me. Not based on anything I was told either, but just the sparse bit of media Disney has put out about the ride thus far. If the ride was likely going to be generally sparse of AA's, then I would be more inclined to believe the claim that the finale would receive such a drastic reduction. The thing is that there's some decently strong indication that the ride will still have plenty of AA's in the other scenes.
The most recent piece of art they released late last year for WDW's variant showed the first interior scene right after Slippin Falls. This scene has 8 animatronics in Splash. The art for Tiana shows 11 figures by comparison, an increase over Splash if accurate.
In another somewhat older piece of art for the Disneyland variant, there's what appears to be at least 5 figures that are likely to be AA's in the foreground, and 7 silhouettes of other animals in the background. Keep in mind that unlike WDW, Disneyland's version does not have walls separating the scenes. You can see a lot of the scenes and AA's through other scenes as you're floating along the flume. So personally, i'm inclined to believe that those background silhouettes are supposed to be animatronics, not just flat images painted or projected onto the walls. You can also spot the old hanging Splash possums overhead as well. The only thing is I'm not sure WHERE in the ride this art is supposed to be (if it's even supposed to be somewhere specific), possibly the scene where Brer Bear is trapped in a rope.
If any of this art is remotely accurate to the quantity of the animatronics, then it wouldn't make any sense for the finale to only have 6. Even if the riverboat is removed, it'll still be the largest room in the ride and will no doubt be festive in nature. It makes no logical sense why it would have such a piddling amount of figures if the rest of the scenes have so many.
mickEblu
Well-Known Member
I don't have any information about what they're doing to the scenery aside from the art they've released, so I can't comment either way on the riverboat's fate. All I can say is that it seems like a really pointless, wasteful and just outright baffling decision to get rid of it. There's literally no good reason, it fits a Tiana ride even better than a Song of the South ride (riverboats are actually prominently featured multiple times in PATF, whereas there aren't actually any in the original SOTS).
The claims about the animatronics from the finale also seem a bit dubious to me. Not based on anything I was told either, but just the sparse bit of media Disney has put out about the ride thus far. If the ride was likely going to be generally sparse of AA's, then I would be more inclined to believe the claim that the finale would receive such a drastic reduction. The thing is that there's some decently strong indication that the ride will still have plenty of AA's in the other scenes.
The most recent piece of art they released late last year for WDW's variant showed the first interior scene right after Slippin Falls. This scene has 8 animatronics in Splash. The art for Tiana shows 11 figures by comparison, an increase over Splash if accurate.
In another somewhat older piece of art for the Disneyland variant, there's what appears to be at least 5 figures that are likely to be AA's in the foreground, and 7 silhouettes of other animals in the background. Keep in mind that unlike WDW, Disneyland's version does not have walls separating the scenes. You can see a lot of the scenes and AA's through other scenes as you're floating along the flume. So personally, i'm inclined to believe that those background silhouettes are supposed to be animatronics, not just flat images painted or projected onto the walls. You can also spot the old hanging Splash possums overhead as well. The only thing is I'm not sure WHERE in the ride this art is supposed to be (if it's even supposed to be somewhere specific), possibly the scene where Brer Bear is trapped in a rope.
If any of this art is remotely accurate to the quantity of the animatronics, then it wouldn't make any sense for the finale to only have 6. Even if the riverboat is removed, it'll still be the largest room in the ride and will no doubt be festive in nature. It makes no logical sense why it would have such a piddling amount of figures if the rest of the scenes have so many.
I think the problem many of us have, including myself, is that we keep forgetting (no matter how many times they show us) that this isn’t the old Disney. We got used to and fell in love with the Disney difference throughout the decades but they’ve thrown out the rule book and it’s why many Disney parks fans are angry, sad and confused. Much of what they do these days makes no sense.
Last edited:
BrerFoxesBayouAdventure
Well-Known Member
There's been a lot of conflicting sources and I don't know who to believe. Did the ESSENCE New Orleans festival already happen?
Homemade Imagineering
Well-Known Member
Brer Panther
Well-Known Member
Remember when everybody was saying they would probably keep the riverboat? Yeah...
Your comparisons to Tokyo's Beauty and the Beast ride are pretty spot-on. I have the feeling this will be the log flume equivalent of that - great animatronics, no substance.
LittleBuford
Well-Known Member
I’m not sure why everyone is surprised that they’re ditching the riverboat. Keeping it would have been a very prominent reminder of Splash.
