Disstevefan1
Well-Known Member
I heard they assigned it to a part time intern.The same Apex Tech art school grad that designed the CFTOD logo designed this…
I heard they assigned it to a part time intern.The same Apex Tech art school grad that designed the CFTOD logo designed this…
"Foods" is just awful.
It sounds bad.
It would have been better had they skipped the food conglomerate thing and stuck with the restaurant.
"Tiana's Place" would have been nice.
Great idea, do you know if that is supposed to happen?I think some water pouring down from different angles of the tower would do wonders for the new design. Give it some kinetic energy.
@Sir_Cliff, I found an old walk-through video that shows the same text as in the photograph you shared, so it must be original:Those don’t look original to me. The second one is fine, but the first suffers from the “Word stencil” issue.
I know it’s from the film, but it’s a trite statement that looks like something that will soon be on some Etsy Disney shop (and sadly with a more creative design than the ones offered by Disney proper)I agree! Why couldn't they have done this in a style and font that matched the theme (as was done with the front of the tower)? This is pure laziness.
This is correct.
However, the same issue existed with Splash as well - the deep south is a far cry from the old west. We just didn't care because we grew up with it that way. If all goes as I think it will, the ride will fit its surroundings much better in the near future.
Have you seen it in person today?I'm sorry, but that tiara is even worse in person. I'm not against the inclusion of the style or the idea. Incorporating the tiara into a period-appropriate logo for Tiana's Foods would have been fine. Putting a garish tiara on top of a water tower in a modern metal in rural Louisiana is just stupid. (Let alone the idea that an employee-owned co-op paid for a garish symbol of aristocracy - if we are going to dig into the real meaning.) I get not taking things too seriously, and I'm all for that. But, they are choosing to take this very seriously, and that is a very stupid (if not problematic addition).
I thought Tiana was meant to be celebrated for her culinary skills and business mind - not being a princess who used her husband's money to build a company...
Or the wandering droids.Believing disney will build something based off what they say is not a wise bet. I still can’t find my elevated Epcot bar.
Intentional weathering is rarely left to the elements at Disney. If a more weathered look is desired, it will be achieved through post-installation faux finishing techniques.Any idea if the metal is the kind that is intended oxidize and look weathered?
That might help with the aesthetics. In the model, it looks more brown.
I don't believe that level of geographic accuracy is necessary in a park like Magic Kingdom.I get that and agree from a ride experience perspective.... But also seen a lot of chatter about how no mountains in Louisiana so then making the hill look lower makes sense thematically
It's coming, y'all. The top of the water tower is on the back of a truck, somewhere in Central Florida, presumably headed to WDW.
But it fits so well in FrontierlandI'm sorry, but that tiara is even worse in person. I'm not against the inclusion of the style or the idea. Incorporating the tiara into a period-appropriate logo for Tiana's Foods would have been fine. Putting a garish tiara on top of a water tower in a modern metal in rural Louisiana is just stupid. (Let alone the idea that an employee-owned co-op paid for a garish symbol of aristocracy - if we are going to dig into the real meaning.) I get not taking things too seriously, and I'm all for that. But, they are choosing to take this very seriously, and that is a very stupid (if not problematic addition).
I thought Tiana was meant to be celebrated for her culinary skills and business mind - not being a princess who used her husband's money to build a company...
Organic, and sustainably sourced!If you look close, it is already pre-weathered.
And looks pretty awful from any standpoint... Unless they are building a whole section of the "Foods factory" building visible from the front of the attraction, there is no reason to have a water tower sitting out front... A water tower in front of a salt mountain... Does this mean there will be interior show sets and scenes inside the "Foods Factory"? What kind of generic "Foods" does she manufacture?
Will she be offering her employee/partners paid medical and dental and maternity leave? What is the profit share margin and to what states does she ship her "Foods" to? See once they open the door with that ridiculous storyline from 2023 perspective, tacked onto a storyline set in 1920, it opens the door to more questions... I hope these "foods" are all organic....
I don't get the approach of hiding the drop if this is indeed what they are trying to do?Sticks out like a sore thumb right now but I think once they add a few trees it‘ll scale better and look a lot better. A few trees and some weathering and I think it’ll blend well.
It’s crazy to think of all the time and money they’ve spent trying to make this ride look smaller and less intimidating so it’ll appeal to kids who’ll likely be terrified by the drop. It looks better than I expected but I still can’t believe they approved this. A Princess ride that’s going to terrify kids, what could go wrong?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.