GoneForGood
Well-Known Member
I uh. Wow.
The stories still haven’t disappeared, as you’ve claimed.I don't think the vast majority of Americans know who Uncle Remus is. He wasn't even in the log ride at Disneyland that just closed.
Is there some college class on American lit that uses his books for a bit of the curriculum? I'm sure. But that's a very tiny minority of Americans who could even describe Uncle Remus, let alone speak about his work knowledgeably for 5 minutes.
I think you just did. But it was not big deal, just a reminder that WDI has now included the 422 people, or 0.02% of the popultion, who were of Chinese descent who lived in Louisiana in 1930 into the story of Princess Tiana's log ride. Because apparently Tiana isn't interesting enough all on her own and her story needs a little help with some zing and some excitement. Also Filipinos and Mexicans. Tiana is kind of dull all on her own, I guess? They needed some oomph for her backstory?
https://www.census.gov/library/publications/1932/dec/1930a-vol-03-population.html
Right. It doesn’t take one to understand rocket science to see why Naveen is welcomed with no issues.He’s a foreigner and a royal to boot. When Nehru visited Knoxville during his 1949 tour of the US, he clearly wasn’t treated the same as an average African American from Tennessee.
Indeed - people act as if creating a ride that makes efforts to genuinely honor the city of New Orleans couldn't possibly be fun . . . meanwhile New Orleans is famously one of the most fun cities in the world, and only somebody who's never been could possibly think that fun comes despite the history of the city and its people rather than because of it.I think the team is simply having fun with this project. It seems they want to do right by the IP and New Orleans. None of the announcements have indicated that all of these details will be in the actual ride and are essential to the general premise. They are attraction details.
PatF is personally important to me and I’m enjoying these details that are going into the attraction.
Yes, agreed, especially your last sentence. I don’t see the correlation between putting in extra details and a terrible attraction here.Indeed - people act as if creating a ride that makes efforts to genuinely honor the city of New Orleans couldn't possibly be fun . . . meanwhile New Orleans is famously one of the most fun cities in the world, and only somebody who's never been could possibly think that fun comes despite the history of the city and its people rather than because of it.
Trying to capture some of the spirit of the city and its history is not somehow automatically counter to making a hugely entertaining attraction.
I always thought it was kinda funny how rigid people are with what Critter Country could be and take place when Adventureland and Fantasyland are an amalgamation of like 5 different countries.Pooh never made sense in an American Critter Country.
I think that most of the inclusions they are mentioning will fly right past people in line or on the relatively fast moving ride. When I am in queues with backstories and details I love to examine everything but I rarely see anyone else doing it.
Perhaps those who love the flume but not the retheme can do what I do on Space when I play my preferred Dick Dale version. They can listen to the old soundtrack.
As someone who dearly loved the perfect, quiet, relaxed feeling of Bear Country, the Critter Country transformation has always seemed gross, despite the great designs around Splash Mtn. When they destroyed both beautiful AA theaters to install a weak, clunky C-ticket dark ride, Critter Country became my least favorite pocket of merchandising on the planet. The only two things about the Pooh ride that aren’t underwhelming are the queue music loop and the details in the candy shop.I always thought it was kinda funny how rigid people are with what Critter Country could be and take place when Adventureland and Fantasyland are an amalgamation of like 5 different countries.
I don't think anyone likes the Pooh ride. It has some of the shortest lines in the park and even when Splash Mountain's lines were exceedingly long its still short.As someone who dearly loved the perfect, quiet, relaxed feeling of Bear Country, the Critter Country transformation has always seemed gross, despite the great designs around Splash Mtn. When they destroyed both beautiful AA theaters to install a weak, clunky C-ticket dark ride, Critter Country became my least favorite pocket of merchandising on the planet. The only two things about the Pooh ride that aren’t underwhelming are the queue music loop and the details in the candy shop.
No, I love PoohI don't think anyone likes the Pooh ride. It has some of the shortest lines in the park and even when Splash Mountain's lines were exceedingly long its still short.
I like Pooh at WDW, even though it replaced the arguably superior Mr. Toad's Wild Ride. It does a better job of telling the story of the Blustery Day, hits all the story beats, and is finished in a nice and cohesive matter. Hunny Hunt still looks better.No, I love Pooh
Speaking of Pooh, Splash’s closure does make me wonder what the Mr. Toad movement would have been like in the age of Social Media. And even the inverse.I like Pooh at WDW, even though it replaced the arguably superior Mr. Toad's Wild Ride. It does a better job of telling the story of the Blustery Day, hits all the story beats, and is finished in a nice and cohesive matter. Hunny Hunt still looks better.
There would definitely be people arguing that it's just the same ride.Speaking of Pooh, Splash’s closure does make me wonder what the Mr. Toad movement would have been like in the age of Social Media. And even the inverse.
It would probably be similar except you wouldn't have Mr. Toad fans being called racists like some Splash Fans were. And the term Woke wouldn't have been shouted every 5 seconds at people who would be excited for the replacement ride.Speaking of Pooh, Splash’s closure does make me wonder what the Mr. Toad movement would have been like in the age of Social Media. And even the inverse.
Nothing about this project or what we know about it so far smells Baxter. Disney was very quick to name drop him as being attached because they wanted to alleviate concern amongst the fans and look like they had concern over reskinning one of his classic attractions.So I am just going to drop this here, as there have been rumors and talk about this in the past.
Remember back when Disney announced this change a few years ago, Tony Baxter’s name was attached to the overlay project?
Well, that was then….this is now.
Tony is not involved in the retheme, or this project.
Officially.
-
So I am just going to drop this here, as there have been rumors and talk about this in the past.
Remember back when Disney announced this change a few years ago, Tony Baxter’s name was attached to the overlay project?
Well, that was then….this is now.
Tony is not involved in the retheme, or this project.
Officially.
-
We're seeing an awful lot of and from Baxter for someone supposedly officially divorced from the project. He's certainly not publicly disavowing himself from it on social media.So I am just going to drop this here, as there have been rumors and talk about this in the past.
Remember back when Disney announced this change a few years ago, Tony Baxter’s name was attached to the overlay project?
Well, that was then….this is now.
Tony is not involved in the retheme, or this project.
Officially.
-
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.