Tiana's Bayou Adventure: Disneyland Watch & Discussion

EagleScout610

These cats can PLAAAAAYYYYY
Premium Member
If you are perplexed on thinking that they could not possibly creatively bring back a main component of the original film(arguably the most memorable since it was the great formula of an antagonist) than you are not that aware of how the themed entertainment industry's storytelling typically works. You can do this without doing a book report, and it usually works out to great success.
Well, Disney even said back in the 2020 announcement, We pick up this story after the final kiss, so that already meant chances of Facilier coming back were low to begin with. Now, speculation is he was in the Louis focused 'Lost trumpet' plot, but now that we have the salt mine plot, that plot isn't being used anymore. Plus the models at D23 lack any indication he's there.
 
Last edited:

Californian Elitist

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Well, Disney even said back in the 2020 announcement, We pick up this story after the final kiss, so that already meant chances of Facilier coming back were low to begin with. Now, speculation is he was in the Louis focused 'Lost trumpet' plot, but now that we have the salt mine plot, the models at D23 lack any indication he's there.
Thank you. The details that have been shared so far have all been related to things we don’t see in the original movie, with the exception of some returning characters. The salt mines, Tiana’s foods, the Mardi Gras party, new characters, and even the concept art with Tiana’s completely new look (new hairstyle, new outfit). This seems to be a project from nearly scratch.
 

celluloid

Well-Known Member
Well, Disney even said back in the 2020 announcement, We pick up this story after the final kiss, so that already meant chances of Facilier coming back were low to begin with. Now, speculation is he was in the Louis focused 'Lost trumpet' plot, but now that we have the salt mine plot, the models at D23 lack any indication he's there.
I get that he likely won't be in there, the point I Was continuing was that he creatively could be and should be referenced and a part of some darker scene within.
Tropes argument aside, beat stories and experiences of the dynamic as stated, should have good conflict and that is what guests will expect.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
I get that he likely won't be in there, the point I Was continuing was that he creatively could be and should be referenced and a part of some darker scene within.
Tropes argument aside, beat stories and experiences of the dynamic as stated, should have good conflict and that is what guests will expect.
If I may, I think your point is pretty well understood. Creatively they could have told any story they wanted including one that includes Facilier. They have apparently based on all reports and information given by Disney themselves have decided to go in a completely different direction. One that appears to move the story away from Facilier being the antagonist and propels the story forward. And honestly I personally think its a better creative choice to propel the story forward away from the movie than to try and reproduce beats from the movie.

Now whether they "should" include him, well that is a personal opinion. One that is shared among some here, but its just not shared by Disney apparently.
 

britain

Well-Known Member
Maybe there is a concern that he perpetuates a “shifty con” black stereotype, I don’t know. It would be nice to still find a way to use him. It will still be a fun log flume regardless.
 

britain

Well-Known Member
Could it just be that it has nothing to do with concerns about representation?

That’s what I thought too, but then I get this response about how PatF and Soul are criticized for having their much-heralded black main characters detached from their black bodies for much of their films. I never would have thought about that, but I’m a white guy, and not thinking about things like that is what I do best.

Anyway, we KNOW they are removing Splash Mountain over racial depiction concerns, why wouldn’t that continue to guide its replacement?
 

Californian Elitist

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
That’s what I thought too, but then I get this response about how PatF and Soul are criticized for having their much-heralded black main characters detached from their black bodies for much of their films. I never would have thought about that, but I’m a white guy, and not thinking about things like that is what I do best.

Anyway, we KNOW they are removing Splash Mountain over racial depiction concerns, why wouldn’t that continue to guide its replacement?
Splash Mountain is not being removed over racial depictions.
 

celluloid

Well-Known Member
No-one is saying it wasn’t considered. But lots of conclusions are being jumped to on the basis of not very much evidence.
If it would have nothing to do with a concern, that would imply it was not considered. Your post is the one who was saying it was not considered. To consider is to have some concern.

The evidence is the company has a committee to review and is public about it. If they did not consider everything, than the committee is aie and or a waste of money.
 

celluloid

Well-Known Member
The hyper-focus on Facilier and the conspiracies as to why he may or may not be in the ride are very interesting and telling, to say the least.
One would be a fool if you think Disney never thought "Maybe a character who is black and a dark magic con man" is not the best move never crossed their minds. No one is saying it is the only reason, but the company has shown a reputation for removing antagonistic black characters from the parks to avoid the issue altogether.

Again, there is a committee for this.

It is not a hyper focus to be shocked if the main villain, and a really successful marketable one, is not going to be represented in the attraction.
 

Californian Elitist

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
I’m not terribly surprised. Some people really want to subscribe to the idea that everything Disney does is motivated by a certain “agenda”.
Yep. And if we look at decisions that Disney has made in the name of some sort of social-related issue, said issue has been a consistent one for a long period of time. SotS has been a problem since it released, harmful depictions of Africans has been a thing since forever, the Native Americans in Peter Pan, etc. Facilier’s character, in general, doesn’t have a bunch of constant and consistent stigma and negative connotations surrounding him. So, people are now coming up with very interesting theories related to race as to why Disney has made no mention of him being in the ride, when it’s 100% possible that he’s simply not in the ride because he’s not in the story. There’s no balance here.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom