It’s just so….mid.
Gen Z slang aside that I am too old to be using, I’m underwhelmed. The rumors had flown and seemed to be confirmed that WDW was a bit taken back by the backlash from announcing the closure of SM, and actually went back to the board to spend more money and improve the original plans.
What happened? How did they design this and think it would be a truly worthy success to SM? I kid you not, I almost decided to renew my pass just so I could experience TBA, because after the social media AA previews and insiders expressing optimism, I had hope. Now, I am glad I didn't renew. Is the ride superstar limo? no, thank god. But by WDW deciding SM needed to change, for better or for worse, they set a HIGH bar for this attraction. And even then, after the announcement of multiple AA's, more then FEA's paltry amount, I was ok that even it could be 70 percent of what SM was, it would be satisfying.
Now, compare that POV to the new Tangled ride over in Asia for example. How did they drop the ball on this to make it middling and average? How can WDI produce those amazing attractions, yet couldn't do Tiana and PatF justice after a budget increase mid project?
Keep in mind this is WDW's only "new" E-Ticket, heck C or D ticket, until at least 2026. That's damning.
Oh well. I will ride it someday, but will wonder what could have been.