I normally only lurk here, and just got home from a week away, but I wanted to stop in and thank everyone (especially WDW1974 -- I'm a big fan!) for all your feedback. As I admitted upfront, my column was "entertainment purposes only" and intended for a general audience that isn't as plugged into the theme park world as the people here.
Specifically regarding Hogwarts Express/Animal Kingdom, all I said is that on many days (not all) of the 4 weeks Diagon Alley has been open, total HE ridership has exceeded DAK gate clicks. I have a couple trusted sources on this (who must remain confidential for obvious reasons). I've also personally spent hours on the train platforms timing dispatches platform and monitoring crowd flow (yes, I've traveled from London to Scotland and back more times than a Hogwarts post-grad student) and I have access to reliable crowd data through TouringPlans. Of course, until official numbers are released I respect anyone's right to disagree, but before you dismiss me consider these publicly confirmable facts:
* Universal was running HE from 7am to to 10pm from the day after Diagon opened until August 1. (Now it's starting around 7:30.)
* The 2 trains each carry 168 passengers, and even when there is only a 10 minute wait nearly every train is dispatched full (or close to it).
*Dispatch times have been far quicker than originally anticipated. Uni initially hoped for 8 minute cycles, but the TMs have been averaging 7:30 or better. I've personally seen >7, and they keep getting more consistent with experience.
Doing the math, 8 dispatches an hour gets them a total THRC of 2688; I'd wager they've been hitting 2,500 on a regular basis, which translates to a daily ridership of well over 30k. TEA/AECOM estimated DAK's 2013 attendance at 10.198 mil, which is a daily average of just under 27k.
As for what those facts mean, I agree that it's comparing apples to oranges, but I think it makes an interesting metaphor for the current state of the local market, and serves to dispel the speculation that guests were balking at paying the increased park-to-park premium (which IMHO was as much intended to dampen HE demand as boost revenue).
Finally, as to me being a Universal "homer," I'm a past Uni TM (they fired me more than once) and admit that their recent expansions appeal more to my tastes than anything Disney has added recently. But if your read the body of my writing, you'll see I'm constructively critical and appreciative of both company's products in a fairly evenhanded way. I write a mostly positive (though Unofficial) guidebook to Disneyland, I visit WDW weekly, and I even have a 1st edition Abram's Epcot book on my coffee table. I certainly am not biased against Disney, and I don't want Disney to become Universal. I just want WDW to be the best resort it can be, and know it is capable of more than we've seen for the last decade.
Thanks again for reading, and feel free to leave a comment on the Weekly's website too!