The Spirited Seventh Heaven ...

Magenta Panther

Well-Known Member
Oh, did I mention that, in my view, Sleeping Beauty is a terrible film that relies far too much on pretty animation and art direction rather than character development and story.

It is probably one of Walt's weakest animated films. He admitted it himself, saying, "It just kind of got away from me..." (He was busy with Disneyland at the time, I think...)

But man, as animated films go, is it ever gorgeous...and the dragon!!!! Best movie dragon ever.
 

WDW1974

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Spirit doesn't know everything. Ideas are always in motion. What he heard someone say on a boat ride could be fact one day and fiction the next.
Is what it is.
Cars land was happening....until it wasn't. Same with Star Wars.
Until you see something announced and shovels in the ground, it's all just rumors.
Even when something becomes fact, it still takes years and years to get built at Disney.

No, Spirit doesn't know everything. But he knows a helluva lot. And he is even willing to share much of what he knows here with strangers. Aren't you lucky?

Things do change and that is why it, frankly, takes a lot of balls to show up here and do what I do. When things change, suddenly, I'm a liar or had my facts wrong, even when neither of those is true. But would you prefer a site where people just talk about their favorite rides, moderate resorts at WDW or characters? Because that is the other option.

I state facts as I know them to be when I can source them. I state rumours when I either only have one source or have a very good idea something is accurate, but don't have all the facts. I state opinions because I love my opinions and I love how they affect others so deeply, so primal.

Cars Land was never a done deal. It was a strongly considered possibility that was more like a probability. Star Wars isn't the same thing. It will be happening in DL and in WDW and, likely, in most foreign resorts in one form or another. The fact it was delayed doesn't change the inevitability of it.

I don't want to appear smarmy, although I feel like I am posting a lot because I heard something troubling tonight (no, not about Disney, only about someone near and dear to me so you can exhale now) and I am reminded of a conversation I had with two dear friends about the Disney fan community and how you can never make them happy and I agree. Not sure what makes fans happy, but sometimes I am convinced it is bad news. I could start a thread about how great my cruise was and how much I enjoyed DLR, but that isn't really what most of you want to hear.

I am truly sorry for all of us that the WDW of 2014 isn't the WDW of 1974 or 1984 or 1994. I am sorry that it is largely run by soul less execs that only care about the bottom line, and that they have destroyed much of what made the place special for millions of us. But that simply is the reality. You can make the best of it or stop visiting or visit and spend less (as I do) or rail about it online and to folks behind the scenes and see what kind of toxic stew you can brew that just might take a few of those missing souls down into the abyss.

One thing I can say is all the Mommy Bloggers in the world can't change the fact that UNI is the resort where things are happening this summer ... and next ... and the next ... and ...
 

FigmentJedi

Well-Known Member
Sleeping Beauty is where Walt-era animated features peaked in my opinion (and that's definitely true on the technical level what with the switch to Xerox). The artistry, classy atmosphere, the villain, and the amazing climax were heights never really reached again until the 90s Renaissance. There's a reason that it's continued to be a reference point within the parks and Disney in general besides the initial Disneyland synergy.

But the movie just keeps taking a dump on the source material in it's efforts to try and copy the Wicked formula and miss the point of what made that revisionist Oz fanfic work.
 

WDW1974

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
DCL-
I am holding out hope that when new ships are built, they build something in size between the Classic ships and the Dream/Fantasy. Please do no go "megaship".

Someone mentioned the port at New Orleans. Is the Mississippi navigable for ships the size of the Dream/Fantasy? How long does it take from the time the ships enter the river to get to the cruise terminal?

@WDW1974 you mentioned that you had mostly good things to say about DCL. Again, from much of what I read on this forum and my experience with DCL, it seems like DCL and WDW are operated by totally different companies.

Next line of DCL ships will most certainly be a size in between the classic ships and the new ones. The only way one isn't named the Disney Spirit is if someone who hates me greatly is still with the company at that time in a position of power (no, not kidding at all) ... as to your point about them being operated by different companies, it sure feels that way, doesn't it? But they aren't.

DCL is run out of Celebration Place,mere spitting distance from where Dr. Blondie and Co. play the social media manipulation game (not telling anyone to spit on the dear woman, that would be vile, firing her would be better but since they won't even touch Jason Surrell until he gets physical with someone ...)
 

WDW1974

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Unfortunately, that doesn't sound anything like this quote from the Tom Fitzgerald thread...

Disney is poised to begin a major re-Imagineering of Epcot, looking to restore the original intent of the park in both Future World and World Showcase. Tom's extensive experience with WDI should position him well to take on such a project.

...which prompted long lists of blue sky ideas from those posting their hopes there.

That quote was attributed to MAGICal Steve, who may have gotten a tad over enthused by the news. Also, tere was a strong pull to spin this positively as I was contacted by a few WDI types asking just that. Oh, I refused, of course, because they gave me nothing whatsoever to back up that opinion. ... And I recently heard that Fitz doesn't have much time left before he joins his old sparing partner, Tony Baxter, in the land of ex-Imagineers.
 

WDW1974

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
The article says:
In addition, we have been informed that an 18 month "build time" should be expected from the closure of Maelstrom to the re-opening of the new attraction. It is anticipated that the post show video area will somehow be integrated into the queue and the attraction would exit out directly into a gift shop. These details are still in flux, but our source has advised us that this is the current plan under consideration. With that said, it can be speculated that Maelstrom would close in January 2015 with a re-opening in summer of 2016.

wow 18 months... Sounds like they may rip out that big screen. so long spirit of norway.

Pardon me, but exactly what source does this come from and what rep do they have? Another words, do they know anything or are they taking my info and making stuff up that they believe sounds good?
 

WDW1974

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
So Disneyland is getting all their Fantasyland rides plussed. Is there ANY chance that could happen here? I know it's been said our Mermaid is planned to get the same update as DCA eventually but it would be nice to see updates for Peter Pan and Pooh too, lord knows they need it. Also it's nice to hear that DHS is still included in the plans for Star Wars right now, even if it will take a while.

No plans for us whatsoever.

Mermaid looks so MUCH better at DCA with more fake fish added, a few props and blacklighting the Under The Sea room. How this wasn't done to begin with sorta boggles the mind again about the alleged talent that works for WDI. Now, they need (and plan to) rework the ending.

Oh, and WDW will get these fixes as well. But Phil will likely put them off as long as possible because while DL can operate with three E-Tickets and a C-Ticket down (and with a few E-Tix going down briefly during the day too!), MK simply is so low capacity that closing one urinal and popcorn cart can send the place careening toward hell.
 

WDW1974

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Oh, did I mention that, in my view, Sleeping Beauty is a terrible film that relies far too much on pretty animation and art direction rather than character development and story.

Saw it on my cruise (along with many others Disney films I hadn't seen in years including Alice, Pan, 101 Dalmatians, Love Bug, Chicken Little and Jungle Book for starters) ... I rather enjoyed rediscovering it. Now, I do think the look of the film may overcome some deficiencies in the areas you mention. But I think you are being too hard on it.

BTW, why is it that Song of the South is vile and racist but Peter Pan with it's 'What Makes the Red Man, Red?' number isn't? Oh yeah, like Dumbo it sells hundreds of millions of dollars in merchandise!!!
 

WDW1974

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
hoping to hear about some details of going through the panama canal..

my stepdad ,myself and a few others did it on a 95 foot yacht my step dad had bought
we brought it from washington state back here to florida with stops in acapulco and panama b4 making the big push thru the canal

remind me in the next few days when I am awake and will gladly share those happy (and humid) memories!
 

rustghoul

New Member
BTW, why is it that Song of the South is vile and racist but Peter Pan with it's 'What Makes the Red Man, Red?' number isn't? Oh yeah, like Dumbo it sells hundreds of millions of dollars in merchandise!!!

That and people only seem to really freak out about racism when it involves black people
 

Snowflake82

Active Member
In order to make Maleficent a more sympathetic character, they made all the good guys from the original film either evil or incompetent.

That sounds awful! I'm fine with making the baddie more "misunderstood", but not at the expense of character assassination of the other familiar characters.

This reminds me of the terrible live action Grinch movie (of which I never saw more than the first 30 minutes). In that one, the Who's were super materialistic about Christmas and mean to the Grinch as well, until he taught them the lesson, right? It's not quite the same as metaphorical rape; my point is more about completely changing other characters to serve the movie.
 
Last edited:

Snowflake82

Active Member
Answer.

Question: What is Disney planning on giving Poly guests free admission to (one day, apparently) starting late July when they close and destroy the pool.

BTW, anyone else notice/weirded out that Disney put out artwork showing children drinking an apparently alcoholic beverage while sitting at the bar at the new Trader Sam's location?

I think another thread decided that it was a petite woman with a bad 80's haircut, but still, definitely a weird piece of artwork.
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
Biggest difference between WDW and DLR? People are so much happier in Anaheim, both guests and cast. It has been this way as far back as my experience goes (first visit to DL was in 1990). DLR isn't overwhleming and everything doesn't have to be scheduled in advance (an absurd way to visit a theme park) and people are just more relaxed. You don't see those meltdowns a minute that you do in O-Town.

Bingo! I've noticed that too, but I couldn't quite put my finger on it for the longest time. And like you said, you notice it in both the paying visitors AND the Cast Members. Not that they are all perfect animatronics in Anaheim, and not that I haven't noticed great CM's in Orlando, but the CM's as a whole in Anaheim just look and act more well rested, more relaxed, and happy with things.

I notice it especially with the female CM's in Anaheim, in the obvious care and time they put into doing their hair and makeup for the day, like women who care about their professional appearance. Especially the young ladies working in Cars Land with their rockabilly hairdos, or on Buena Vista Street with their elaborately styled 1930's curls and waves. And in Orlando with the often makeup-less face and the slightly greasy hair pulled back into a scrunchy as their "hairdo".

There's an apparent difference in the type of life the average Orlando CM lives, versus the average Anaheim CM. It shows in their faces and their demeanor and often in things as silly as their hairdo, or lack of hairdo.
 

Longhairbear

Well-Known Member
DVC expansion at DLR isn't a priority. They are only interested in continuing to honor Walt's dream about the Florida project. Remember, Walt said, ''We have enough land here for all the timeshares we can possibly dream of.'' I know that's true. Gary Buchanan wrote it on the DBP!!!

Personally, while having a SO be an owner of DVC certainly makes planning easier for me, I like DVC's tiny footprint at the DLR. I can point to DVC as part of the Walmarting of WDW.

But as WDW 'owners', we certainly lucked out into being able to book into the GCV,
And that just points to how clueless they are, a market they don't see. Over build in FLA, and underbuild in a tight real estate situation in CA. Morons.
I love the small footprint of the villas too. But they could build a fourth tower at the DLH, or build a themed resort on the strawberry property.
They are giving away thousands of room stays to the local hotels, and ignoring a fan base of DVC owners, idiots.
 
Last edited:

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom