Can someone clarify something for me? In the MiceAge article, he says:
"If the recent greenlighting were an override from Lasseter, it would explain why the parks are currently refurbishing some of the things that are likely to go away in the expansion: because Team Disney Orlando assumed it had the right to veto the expansion and not spend the money that way. That, as well as the fact that any expansion would take time to actually build."
I don't get it. Why would refurbishing something (and spending the money) make sense if your'e going to tear it down in the future? That confuses me.
Thanks...
Judy