Phroobar
Well-Known Member
Worst. A She Hulk show.They’re going to take this opportunity to change Fantasmic to a Star Wars show!
Worst. A She Hulk show.They’re going to take this opportunity to change Fantasmic to a Star Wars show!
I totally understand this take. However, I'd argue it isn't so much hubris, but an impatience to get flight data NOW so that they can make any necessary modifications to the large number of vehicles piling up at the production site. Their rate of production is amazeballs, and the flight data was lagging behind in comparison. Should they have waited just a couple of more months to finish installing their planned water-cooled-launch-plate-flame-diverter-thingy? Maybe. It's easy to say yes in hindsight, but since we don't have access to all of their "decision tree analysis"....Starship completely destroyed its launchpad, debris from which then destroyed engines, because it didn’t have flame diverters like other launch pads. That was Elon’s hubris, not something that needed to be learned.
This impatience as you call it is not unique to this one project.I totally understand this take. However, I'd argue it isn't so much hubris, but an impatience to get flight data NOW so that they can make any necessary modifications to the large number of vehicles piling up at the production site. Their rate of production is amazeballs, and the flight data was lagging behind in comparison. Should they have waited just a couple of more months to finish installing their planned water-cooled-launch-plate-flame-diverter-thingy? Maybe. It's easy to say yes in hindsight, but since we don't have access to all of their "decision tree analysis"....
To be fair, the media and the public have been conditioned to NASA's mode of operations. NASA's stuff can't fail this spectacularly in the public eye or Congress pulls funding. Consequently, they play it safe with hardware that's been used for decades.The goal of that launch was to clear the tower. The vehicle did that and much more. Everything else was additional data collected to improve upon which SpaceX will do. Media and Elon haters going "hur hur, his rocket 'splode" don't know what they're talking about.
Concerning the obliteration of the launch pad itself, it was a known problem that could occur, it did, and SpaceX already has a solution.
View attachment 712057
You say that like it's a bad thing. That impatience and hardware-rich design philosophy is what got SpaceX to be where they are today and has completely upended the space industry. But that's ok if you don't agree. There are plenty of other space companies with more palatable CEO's to cheer on.This impatience as you call it is not unique to this one project.
The arc reactor is more impressive than the repulsor tech that rides on it, but I suppose that's not the point.Just so we are clear for the MCU geeks.
We love technology and the promise of what it will bring in the future. Space travel was always part of the park experience. Theme parks let you do something that you can't do daily. Aerospace is working to make that happen for everyone.A miscellaneous thought/weird philosophical question.....
Why are there a bunch of us that are fans of Disney parks and aerospace? I mean, I know we aren't a HUGE group, but we are more in number than I would expect. I see us on twitter, on this board, and on space places around the web. What is it about these two things that captures us?
I know people don't like Elon Musk, but the work Space X does is genuinely impressive.
To be fair, the media and the public have been conditioned to NASA's mode of operations. NASA's stuff can't fail this spectacularly in the public eye or Congress pulls funding. Consequently, they play it safe with hardware that's been used for decades...
You say that like it's a bad thing. That impatience and hardware-rich design philosophy is what got SpaceX to be where they are today and has completely upended the space industry. But that's ok if you don't agree. There are plenty of other space companies with more palatable CEO's to cheer on.
Watching a Falcon 9 land just never gets old.Isn't it incredible?!? I'm addicted to watching those Falcon 9 rockets re-enter and land on their little floating platforms now. I still just sit with my mouth open watching it in amazement. And how many of them exploded before they perfected that process? I'm sure plenty.
Watching a Falcon 9 land just never gets old.
You are right, they blew up quite a few. Here's their celebration of those:
This is my conundrum. I do love the launches and their tech but he says some stupid, offensive stuff.I know people don't like Elon Musk, but the work Space X does is genuinely impressive.
He spoke at my nephew's college graduation. I'm sorry to say, it was really boring. Like a 40-minute ad for his companies.This is my conundrum. I do love the launches and their tech but he says some stupid, offensive stuff.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.