PiratesMansion
Well-Known Member
I would love to be proven wrong, but I'm skeptical that this is true.Iger actually understands what the Disney brand is. He gets that it is a creative company at it's core. I'm hopeful that internal decisions about creative hiring will be better.
Iger to me always seemed least comfortable and interested in the Disney of the Walt Disney Company. He always seemed far more comfortable dealing with ESPN, Marvel, Star Wars, etc. than he did with the parks, Disney films, or anything historic to the company.
He was excited about Shanghai Disneyland, the biggest collection of IPs then put into an opening day castle park and in many ways a massive rebuffing of core Disney theme park principles, because it represented a wheelhouse he was more comfortable in. He molded the parks to fit his own image rather than really come to understand what they were about.
The IP mandate and mass franchising began under him. It was more successful than under Chapek, but it was certainly there for his tenure.
He made the decision to put Chapek in charge of parks and promote him to head of the company.
I'd love to be wrong. Truly. And he's a better leader than Chapek, certainly. But...