We just watched this last weekend. I enjoyed it for what it was, but I squarely put this in the "how many times can we make this same movie" category. Yes, the world and character design were interesting, but this was really just "Guess Who's Coming to Dinner" dressed up in some nifty animation.I watched Elemental for the first time last night.
Not one of Pixar's high watermarks, but I did think that the conceptual logic had more thought put into it than some of their other more recent films-and, not recent by any stretch, but a bit more logical than, say, Cars. It reminded me of Zootopia both in look (do Disney and Pixar share a common cityscape software program at this point?) and in overall message, which just goes to reinforce that there's no meaningful distinction between Disney and Pixar anymore. There was, naturally, some beautiful animation featured, particularly water animation, which looked more photorealistic than I can recall in any previous Disney/Pixar movie, and there was some good character animation with the male protagonist, whose name I have already forgotten.
The real problem was (as usual) the terribly modern script aimed at the lowest common denominator, and (unusually for Pixar) the voice cast, who certainly did nothing to elevate the material or convincingly argue that no one else could have played these characters. I enjoyed Elemental more than Onward, not that that's saying much, and The Good Dinosaur (the OTHER movie made by this film's director), but I'm not sure how I would rank it compared to the others. It'd definitely be in the bottom half of their filmography.
I do hope at some point Pixar is able to get to a point where they're consistently turning out gold the way they were from, say, 99-09, but it seems further and further away with each passing year.
It’s cute.
Possibly my most controversial Disney opinion is my stance they should tear down the Matterhorn. Of course, if they did that, I believe it should be rebuilt, just better. I’ve always been drawn to this fan concept art that includes an entire Alps complex with multiple attractions, dining, and shops. This would be worth losing the history of the Matterhorn, the subs, and the lagoon.I went on the Matterhorn for the first time in a long while during my last trip.
I totally get the classic Disney charm it has but it seriously is the most rough ride experience at the park. I left the ride with a headache which never happens to me after riding roller coasters.
The Matterhorn and Splash Mountain both had different searing arrangements pre 2010 and were much more comfortable fun rides. The seat dividers made both rides worse, especially matterhorn.I went on the Matterhorn for the first time in a long while during my last trip.
I totally get the classic Disney charm it has but it seriously is the most rough ride experience at the park. I left the ride with a headache which never happens to me after riding roller coasters.
I watched Elemental for the first time last night...
I do hope at some point Pixar is able to get to a point where they're consistently turning out gold the way they were from, say, 99-09, but it seems further and further away with each passing year.
We just watched this last weekend. I enjoyed it for what it was, but I squarely put this in the "how many times can we make this same movie" category. Yes, the world and character design were interesting, but this was really just "Guess Who's Coming to Dinner" dressed up in some nifty animation.
Yes. Flew them years ago LA to Tokyo. Still talk about it.
A floor doesn't do much when the ceiling is collapsing and the walls have crumbing. The movie was mediocre and predictable. I think it made the wait to watch on Disney+ even more appropriate. It sure wasn't must see in theaters day one.Over in the movie sub-forum I had postulated that the best thing about Elemental is that it seems to have stopped the damage being done to the Pixar brand. Chapek's Disney+ strategy was disastrous for all of Disney's flagship studios with mega-budget movies, but Pixar seems to have fared the worst from that.
Elemental might not become a beloved classic, but at least it was a solid movie that put a floor under the collapsing Pixar brand. Let's hope that the next two or three movies at least are really good, and Pixar can re-establish itself as a "Must See In Theaters" movie brand instead of the "Wait To Watch For Free On Disney+" movie brand in the minds of American parents and ticket buyers.
Looks better than most recent Disney movies, but I have a feeling the moral of this is going to be terrible. The king is clearly justified in his actions of not granting every wish yet he's made out to the be villain?
Looks better than most recent Disney movies, but I have a feeling the moral of this is going to be terrible. The king is clearly justified in his actions of not granting every wish yet he's made out to the be villain?
Looks better than most recent Disney movies, but I have a feeling the moral of this is going to be terrible. The king is clearly justified in his actions of not granting every wish yet he's made out to the be villain?
The movie will underperform because with its ridiculous budget it will need to make like $600M just to break even?Don't you think there will be some sort of twist?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.