StarWarsGirl
Well-Known Member
- In the Parks
- No
You see, I understand that yes, he is the owner, and in the end, yes, it is his business, but the thing is, I get a heck of a lot more done when he's not there. If his wife isn't in the office (which when he's there, you can guarantee she's not) I call her several times during my shift to report in. She knows basically everything that's going on. And she's the expert when it comes to the HR side of the business. She's also the calmer one who will remember what I tell her. I don't mind him saying stuff like, "Well, when you're calling a candidate, say this a little differently..." but when he's in the middle of what appears to be an important sales call, no, I'm not interrupting to tell him how we're proceeding with a phone line issue. Not when I've already dealt with the issue. If I interrupted, he'd probably ask me why I was interrupting.I don't want to sound disparaging, but, you are talking about life. The firms owner has everything on the line, you have a single job. He/She may have life savings, home mortgages, debt up the tutu and people putting pressure on him/her to produce. Might even be something as simple as a bank that wants to see better returns. So, yes, he/she will be a royal pain in the butt when around. They will micro-manage because, frankly, it is their business. If they don't have the right to want to see it their way, who does? One mistake that employees make quite often is the idea that because you are a "manager" means you are completely in-charge, that is not true. What a business owner hires a manager for is to operate his/her company the way he/she wants to see it running. Unless, they come right out and say... do whatever you want, that is what is expected. They want you to make sure it is run the way they want it run. You, as management, are there to stand in for the involved owner, not take over unless that is specifically in your job description. A manager has to work within the confines of the wishes of the owner. The only one in any company that can do things exactly like they want to, would be the owner, no one else. Everyone else works under the directions and philosophy of the owner.
I also don't mind if he asks me to use Publisher to make a sales flyer, but when he pulls me away from my desk to send his emails or text messages, and then later asks why his interview schedule isn't filled, that is frustrating as well. He needs either a personal assistant or to learn how to use the technology himself.
This will likely be a good learning experience for me, but the micromanaging, combined with other issues (including the fact that the workload has been so horrible that I haven't even gotten a lunch break the past few Fridays when I've been there all day), might be a reason for me to say adieu come December.