jt04
Well-Known Member
A billion for the 50th?
I'm using round numbers and including a portion on infrastructure in that. It wasn't meant to be literal.
A billion for the 50th?
Has she ever asked you why Epcot is a Disney park without any Disney characters in it?I live in a strange experience in that my fiancée did not grow up with WDW and her experience is that its great. She doesn't really know anything else and her experience with the attractions is vastly different than mine. She loves ToT, TT, Soarin, EE, etc...She didn't understand the appeal of PotC and HM...the classics...she enjoyed them, but they don't hold any sort of nostalgia for her.
Has she ever asked you why Epcot is a Disney park without any Disney characters in it?
WoL and HISTA and Animation areaI don't deny that a lot of things are no longer. Many of those things were quite good, but perhaps some remembered more fondly through nostalgia glasses rather than because of quality ( ). But many of them were replaced.
One way to look at was was lost and replaced or not replaced is to go through the map of WDW and put your finger on a spot where there is currently no ride/attraction, but there used to be. What comes to my mind is:
But even then, the presumption and inside info is that there will eventually be a replacement for them.
- SGE
- Innoventions
- Main Street (electric night parade)
- Planet Watch
Other 'empty' places have their replacements currently in construction:
So, where else is there in all of the parks where there's something missing that doesn't have a replacement? Where are the empty spots where an attraction once existed but has no replacement?
- Back Lot Tour
- Car Stunt Show
- GMR
- Energy
Then there is the consideration of whether the replacement was an upgrade or a dud? Everyone agrees the current Figment falls into the category of dud. The M&G of Launch Bay is a bit of a downgrade from the animation class. While people mourn the poor placement of the new MMRR and GotG, it's generally agreed that the quality of the ride replacing them is an upgrade. Back Lot Tour to one of the SW E-Tickets may be a wash, but a SW E-Ticket certainly beats a car stunt show. The loss of Horizons is a bit complicated because of sponsorship and structural issues. I would think everyone would agree Pandora is much much better than camp Mickyminnie.
Then there are places you can point to where there is now, or soon to come, a brand new attraction not replacing anything:
I'm loathe to mention the Cars show coming to DHS because I have little hope it'll be good.
- TRON
- Ratatouille
- TSL
- Poppins Ride
- a bunch of other rumored attractions
Would two of these attractions reuse aspects from Body Wars or CC?Nah, WoL counts for the loss column.
Good news is the rumblings off putting something (or two things) in there...
Would two of these attractions reuse aspects from Body Wars or CC?
(At least CC since Buzzy still works?)
Did you see the thing about them testing him, and he (for the most part) worked just fine?Buzzy does not still work...he "exists", but those systems have long since been removed or rotted.
Would two of these attractions reuse aspects from Body Wars or CC?
(At least CC since Buzzy still works?)
Sorry if this has already been discussed, but the source of the now-debunked Wreck it Ralph replacement rumor was the upcoming Void attraction, right?
Well that's what I'm asking- isn't the source of that rumor the upcoming Void thing they've developed.It wasn't debunked, Disney decided not to greenlight the proposed WiR replacement for SGE.
Well that's what I'm asking- isn't the source of that rumor the upcoming Void thing they've developed.
Thanks!The insiders who have said there *may* be attraction(s) going into have not said what type of attraction except to say Body Wars ain't coming back.
Nope. Two separate things. Void does void stuff. Disney would not be doing a VR ride.
It would be like saying that Void's Star Wars VR adventure is the source the Disney's going to build a Star Wars land. Two different companies leveraging the same IP, only in Ralph's case, Disney didn't go through with the proposed Ralph attraction.
What I'm wondering is whether the work being done both by Disney and the Void for this project was mistakenly assumed by someone to be intended for an in-park VR experience, and that misunderstanding, possibly passed from person to person, was the source of the rumor.
And I'm still not sure you understand the question.I don't know of any more ways to say 'no' to this question. Sorry.
Based off of comments from insiders on here, they were always separate projects. They just happened to complete one and can the other (or at least postpone it).What I'm wondering is whether the work being done both by Disney and the Void for this project was mistakenly assumed by someone to be intended for an in-park VR experience, and that misunderstanding, possibly passed from person to person, was the source of the rumor.
And I'm still not sure you understand the question.
No.Would two of these attractions reuse aspects from Body Wars or CC?
(At least CC since Buzzy still works?)
Since this is Disney:Imagine how far a billion could have went to address the minutia.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.