CaptainAmerica
Premium Member
Wouldn't look that cool from ground level. Every building is the same.
Wouldn't look that cool from ground level. Every building is the same.
That is also unknown.That is unknown. Yes, Star Tours is getting new destinations later this year, but it has never been stated if it will remain once the expansion is complete.
Given that the Millennium Falcon will be right in front of it in the expansion,
Jakku is the new desert planet.
Set up a poll. "Tatooine or the concept art released at D23." I bet you any amount of money that the concept art wins.
This would be the worst theme park land of all time.
Wouldn't look that cool from ground level. Every building is the same.
You guys are hilarious. I'm sure I could go not-too-far-back in this thread and ten others and find you complaining about the lack of "original" ideas in the Disney parks in favor of known commodities. "Previously unknown planet set in the Star Wars universe" is the best of both worlds. It gives WDI creative freedom by not pinning them down to fanboy fantasies, while also capitalizing on well-known IP.Try Mos Eisley Spaceport with the Cantina from the first movie against "What'sThatNewPlanet'sName Spaceport".
I should say that I'm not a big Star Wars fan and I think the concept art looks awesome. But as a Potter fan, if Universal had decided to invent a new all encompassing "magical" place, I would have been livid.You guys are hilarious. I'm sure I could go not-too-far-back in this thread and ten others and find you complaining about the lack of "original" ideas in the Disney parks in favor of known commodities. "Previously unknown planet set in the Star Wars universe" is the best of both worlds. It gives WDI creative freedom by not pinning them down to fanboy fantasies, while also capitalizing on well-known IP.
Win-win-(win).
I would say that Potter is far more linked to certain places (Hogswarts, Diagon Alley, etc.) than SW. There are certainly iconic planets and settings, but there is an entire galaxy to explore in SW!I should say that I'm not a big Star Wars fan and I think the concept art looks awesome. But as a Potter fan, if Universal had decided to invent a new all encompassing "magical" place, I would have been livid.
It's very possible something this exciting won't happen again at WDW for another 10-to-20 years.I know this has to do with reducing the CapEx money being spread out over many years, but when the CapEx expenditure is at historic lows, (back me up on this @ParentsOf4), you would think they could build a little quicker. I think this announcement was just to shut up fans who kept asking when Disney will build their Star Wars land. A 2017 start seems to indicate a 2020 opening date if there current schedule is followed. Another project that is announced 5-years before completion.
That's just a function of a difference between the IPs involved. Potter needs to be Diagon Alley / Hogwarts / Hogsmeade. The characters spend seven books pretty much exclusively in those three locations. The Star Wars universe has literally thousands of planets that each "feel" Star Wars because of the technology, characters, and creatures that inhabit them. The most notable "place" in Star Wars is space itself, and you can't recreate that (outdoors, at least) in the middle of Florida. Other examples:I should say that I'm not a big Star Wars fan and I think the concept art looks awesome. But as a Potter fan, if Universal had decided to invent a new all encompassing "magical" place, I would have been livid.
I should say that I'm not a big Star Wars fan and I think the concept art looks awesome. But as a Potter fan, if Universal had decided to invent a new all encompassing "magical" place, I would have been livid.
Man, your trying hard.
I'm sure all the Star Wars fans have been waiting for years for Disney to come in and fix it for them so that wouldn't have to suffer a visit to stupid Tatooine.
I'm the opposite on this one. I love Star Wars and didn't particularly care for Avatar, but I think Pandora will be a superior theme park experience (in concept at least... we'll have to see vis a vis execution).Never seen Avatar or Star Wars, but I am certainly more excited for Star Wars over Pandora.
I'm super excited for Pandora as well, it just looks incredible. When all is said and done, Pandora may actually be more memorable, especially is they pull of the bioluminescence. However, I've been wanting a SW theme park all my life. I hope they are able to pull off some amazing attractions for this. I truly believe Disney will go all out (they clearly are putting the money into it). Too bad we won't have the details on them for at least 2 years I think.I'm the opposite on this one. I love Star Wars and didn't particularly care for Avatar, but I think Pandora will be a superior theme park experience (in concept at least... we'll have to see vis a vis execution).
It's very possible something this exciting won't happen again at WDW for another 10-to-20 years.
Enjoy the moment.
I'm really not that excited and haven't been. A lot of it now depends on what the actual attractions are.I'm probably going to regret this, but I feel I'm the only one who is not feeling that excited for Star Wars Land. Please don't get me wrong but I love the star wars films! They are really cool. I have to criticise my own self and say I don't like change and to see alot of the other shows go and that HollyWood Studios name is going so its not an actual studio is also effecting me. But I guess I'll wait and see! After my next trip I don't think ill visit for a few years until all construction is finished. I know I will be completely blown away with it all and it will be amazing but right now Im like, oh no what is Disney doing.
That is also unknown.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.