Not that I know of.Oh no, please tell us ToT isn’t in jeopardy again...
Not that I know of.Oh no, please tell us ToT isn’t in jeopardy again...
Not any more.
I’d also be surprised if certain things weren’t fast tracked soon after SWL opens. But they still have to learn to add, not replace.
Oh no, please tell us ToT isn’t in jeopardy again...
Not that I know of.
OK, so we “know” that at least one of the shows is in line to be replaced.
Presumably Launch Bay /Animation Courtyard too.
And obviously the Star Tours re-imagining eventually.
I’m still worried about the Indy stunt show. Unless they have plans to replace it with a proper Indy ride. But there’s that word replace again.
Can you say anything about which is likely to be the first to go, even if not about the replacement?
So SWGE is not the end of development? Disney can’t walk and chew bubble gum at the same time when it comes to really big park projects, so I guess this comes after EPCOT spine?
Indy is a big people eater. If the concern is crowding, it should have been first to be replaced over GMR.
Ya know, there were times when FoP had 6 hour queues. But they mostly were 3-5 hours the first year.
Now, it's down to 1.5 to 3 hours.
Kinda internally that 6-8 to hours to get in the land then ride an attraction that I was informed of, they project it will last for at least a year.
I’d be concerned about the other parks, particularly for DVC and regular guests. This would probably be a turn off for guests who really aren’t going the make SWGE their reason for visiting. Coupled with expected substantial price increases, I think there is going to be a negative effect at other gates.
Yes, it should.If the main concern right now is capacity shouldn't Indy be one of the last replacements?.
It depends what you class as a negative at the other gates.
I can certainly see it hurting Epcot (except during F&W) and DAK. MK will always be safe.
Epcot is already hurting during F&W. Shame.I can certainly see it hurting Epcot (except during F&W) and DAK. MK will always be safe.
Yes, it should.
But if they thought logically the Mickey ride would have been in addition to the GMR.
It was certainly an option. The IP side of things wasn’t an issue.Was GMR actually an option anymore with all the media companies scrambling to protect and exploit their own individual IP's?.
As I said it depends on what you class as a negative at the other gates? All you have said is which gates will be hurt.
Attendance.
I’m already planning on skipping going in 2020 and will probably let my AP lapse. I’m there at least three times a year for a total of about 3-4 weeks.
It was certainly an option. The IP side of things wasn’t an issue.
It all came down to short term cost. And now they’re scrambling to spend even more money to fix the capacity mistake.
They spent money on Barbie.I remember the days when some complained the weren't spending enough money on the parks. I think it was yesterday.
How many lands have actually had appreciable waits to enter for any period of time? Hogsmeade only? Isn't that more a sizing to popularity issue. Hogsmeade is tiny, SW:GE is not.
I don't think Pandora, Radiator Springs or Diagon Alley have closed to capacity all that often, maybe I am mistaken.
I feel like this waiting to get in is something that won't really be a factor outside of the grand opening period and maybe a holiday or two. Multi-hour waits for the attractions, absolutely. But even still both have a bit more capacity than FoP.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.