I still call the Magic Kingdom 'the Seminole nation.'
Rip your CDs.Rip your CDs and put them on your phone. There: convenience + "Vinyl" (actually higher) quality music.
All kidding aside, yes, the 30+ year attractions (including Splash Mountain) that remain today are incredibly popular among today's kids with few exceptions. Disney largely owes its success to this.
With my 13yos POV Splash is memorable as "the water ride" at Magic Kingdom. We haven't been in 3 years, but she didn't know who the characters were either. Thought it was a different story about Peter Rabbit instead lolBut is Splash popular due to the ride system or the theme?
A friend just went down with his daughter's school group - 140 middle schoolers and they all enjoyed Splash but not a single one knew who the characters were or where they were from
But is Splash popular due to the ride system or the theme?
A friend just went down with his daughter's school group - 140 middle schoolers and they all enjoyed Splash but not a single one knew who the characters were or where they were from
And the music.It's not the Br'er theme itself (i.e. not the IP) -- it's the overall theming quality. it's how detailed everything is with the physical sets, AAs, etc.
Otherwise it could just be a simple log flume ride. People would still enjoy that, but no one would consider it a masterpiece.
Exactly. It always seemed to me pretty much the pinnacle of Imagineering for the integration of story and physical ride experience in a way that was very intricate and well thought out, but reads as almost effortless. Not to beat a dead horse, but on another thread there has been a debate about the Dinosaur storyline and that, to me, is the example of a far more clunky effort to engineer a storyline to fit the ride technology that you need to literally explain to guests before they get on the ride. Splash just sort of unfolds as you move along, with sets, lighting, and music all creating a compelling atmosphere and driving the story along.It's not the Br'er theme itself (i.e. not the IP) -- it's the overall theming quality. it's how detailed everything is with the physical sets, AAs, etc.
Otherwise it could just be a simple log flume ride. People would still enjoy that, but no one would consider it a masterpiece.
DL guests already do this, where they shorten the names of rides and attractions, and I’m pretty sure WDW guests do it, too. Do you personally always say each attraction’s full name?But the name Tiana's Bayou Adventure is really terrible. people will end up calling it Splash forever or just "Tiana"... "Let's go ride Tiana...." There has to be a better catchier name for it that will stick.
Indeed, it seems a non-issue. I'm sure most people already just say they're just going to ride Peter Pan, Pinocchio, Buzz, Pirates, etc. If I had to guess, this will just become "Tiana" which seems fine to me. I think people even shorten Splash Mountain and Big Thunder Mountain to Splash and Big Thunder!DL guests already do this, where they shorten the names of rides and attractions, and I’m pretty sure WDW guests do it, too. Do you personally always say each attraction’s full name?
This will be normal.
Yep! And CMs tend to shorten them even more. When I worked in Fantasyland, we used “Pan,” “Snow,” “Alice,” “Toad,” “Carousel,” etc. We likely all do it. I have referred to Splash Mountain as simply “Splash” a gazillion times.Indeed, it seems a non-issue. I'm sure most people already just say they're just going to ride Peter Pan, Pinocchio, Buzz, Pirates, etc. If I had to guess, this will just become "Tiana" which seems fine to me. I think people even shorten Splash Mountain and Big Thunder Mountain to Splash and Big Thunder!
Yep. When Splash was down on my recent trip, me and my friends got a dole whip and sat down in Frontierland. I looked at my phone, saw it was back up and exclaimed "Splash is back!" And we rushed over.Indeed, it seems a non-issue. I'm sure most people already just say they're just going to ride Peter Pan, Pinocchio, Buzz, Pirates, etc. If I had to guess, this will just become "Tiana" which seems fine to me. I think people even shorten Splash Mountain and Big Thunder Mountain to Splash and Big Thunder!
I wonder how much reference the new ride will make to her "man catching" beignets because you know not offending anyone is Diseny's new business model!!
But it ties the film to an unpleasant and dated reference.Not sure why they would reference beignets as "man catching" if they intend to sell them to people of all genders (and earn more profit). The "man catching beignets" line worked in the movie because it was specifically about Charlotte trying to use Tiana's food to get a husband. But if Disney sells food to all customers, it wouldn't make sense to market beignets as something only men enjoy. You want men and women to buy beignets for themselves!
Nope maelstrom was horrible, glad it's gone. Sorry with every little girl in love with Elsa, I wouldn't say no one thinks it's an improvementAnd its not just Splash.....look at Maelstrom. Literally no one thinks its an improvement....they took a great ride and did some nonsense to it...its a shell of what it was. Im not picking on the character Tiana...but the last princess redo was a dud..
I would have to agree...Honestly Maelstrom was a good idea that just didn't work that well...too short and after the lightning effects were turned off and the storm sequence was calmed down, the second half of the ride was really just waiting for the doors could open so you could get on with your day...And while I was never happy about adding IP to a World Showcase attraction, I can readily admit it is better than whit it replaced...Still a lot of empty space for improvement, but definitely better.Nope maelstrom was horrible, glad it's gone. Sorry with every little girl in love with Elsa.
But I do have to ask, how is it a shell of a ride?? It's the exact same ride. Nothing changed pretty much except they swapped out knomes for snow monsters.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.