Disstevefan1
Well-Known Member
What a relief. I was just joking but thanks for setting me straightIs the Land specifically about sharecroppers in the 1920s south? If not, it’s utterly irrelevant.
What a relief. I was just joking but thanks for setting me straightIs the Land specifically about sharecroppers in the 1920s south? If not, it’s utterly irrelevant.
Gutman, you are a smart poster and I'm going to chalk this up to your need to tear down Disney at any cost. That said I truly hope you know that the original charge of the salt mines being slavery-related to Tiana in the 1920s is ridiculous nonsense since the story takes place 60 years after the Civil War. After that, the failures of Reconstruction, the rise of disenfranchisement, apartheid, and racial terrorism permeated much of the South (and too many bits in the North) to such a degree that there is nothing that can be said about Louisiana in the 1920's that isn't tainted by the problem of racism. Tiana can't have tea without finding a connection to slavery in the way you just connected the dots.Penguin, you are a smart poster and I'm going to chalk this up to your need to defend Disney at any cost. That said, I truly hope you know about what happened in this country after the failure of Reconstruction and what conditions were like in the south throughout the first half of the 20th century.
PS: Additionally, a few minutes googling provides evidence for what was already obvious - the specific mine the Imagineers visit in that video was worked by slaves to supply the confederacy. It also seems to have been discovered by an enslaved man.
Am I alone in knowing nothing about salt mines/domes (including the difference between them)? The idea that this conceit would translate into something that guests could make sense of seems pretty farfetched to me.
The reason Salt Mines are mentioned on Disney Websites is because Disney themselves brought it up during the field trip video they showed at Essance Festival. Of course we don't know what the new scenario is going to be. Everyone at this point is just using educated guesses with what little information they gave us and how the current ride is structured.People are making up their own scenarios and then believing them. Unless I missed something the only mention of salt mines has been Disney websites and nowhere else.
The reason Salt Mines are mentioned on Disney Websites is because Disney themselves brought it up during the field trip video they showed at Essance Festival. Of course we don't know what the new scenario is going to be. Everyone at this point is just using educated guesses with what little information they gave us and how the current ride is structured.
Could Salt Mines have nothing to do with what they are thinking about doing? Absolutely, however my response to that would be why would they mention going to one during the research trip if at the very least they weren't considering using that as part as the attractions story?
As for working in mines during the 1920s sure the workers weren't working in the best conditions but it's not slavery. I'm not sure why that is being brought up in a discussion about a log flume changing.
It was, for all intents and purposes, very close to slavery. Economic exploitation, omnipresent and overwhelming institutional and individual racism, and the constant threat of lynching essentially reproduced the slave system. The fact that more Americans don’t grasp this, don’t understand clearly how horrific the century after the Civil War really was, is a major failing of our educational system.The reason Salt Mines are mentioned on Disney Websites is because Disney themselves brought it up during the field trip video they showed at Essance Festival. Of course we don't know what the new scenario is going to be. Everyone at this point is just using educated guesses with what little information they gave us and how the current ride is structured.
Could Salt Mines have nothing to do with what they are thinking about doing? Absolutely, however my response to that would be why would they mention going to one during the research trip if at the very least they weren't considering using that as part as the attractions story?
As for working in mines during the 1920s sure the workers weren't working in the best conditions but it's not slavery. I'm not sure why that is being brought up in a discussion about a log flume changing.
Alas, they are mentioned by one of the Imagineers in that video Disney released recently. I wish they hadn’t been, because now we can add “Disney is hypocritical for retheming the ride to slavery-related salt mines” to the list of strange talking points that people have come up with.People are making up their own scenarios and then believing them. Unless I missed something the only mention of salt mines has been on this Disney website and nowhere else.
I have a strong feeling that Disney is going to try to stay away from any and all controversy with the new ride. And methinks that the people bringing it up are just all sad that Splash Mountain is going bye-bye.
It’s not a strange talking point at all, it’s absolutely relevant. I think changing the theme of Splash is justified (I think the whole thing should be torn down and a new ride built from the foundations up) and I don’t think salt mines will be involved at all. I do think what is being revealed is that certain posters care much more about supporting anything WDW does then they do about the actual historical issues involved in Splash and it’s retheme.Alas, they are mentioned by one of the Imagineers in that video Disney released recently. I wish they hadn’t been, because now we can add “Disney is hypocritical for retheming the ride to slavery-related salt mines” to the list of strange talking points that people have come up with.
My guess is that Disney was trying to convince us of how much research was going into the retheme and that the finished product won’t have anything to do with salt mines. That’s my hope, at any rate.
People find controversy in everything, give it time. It has already started.
The same can be said now for people who think its past is bad are lining up in the two hour waits. So bad that it has been one of the most popular theme park attractions and well known names of synonmous with Disney vacations since the day it opened until and beyond now.Well I am sure these people will stick to their guns and boycott the ride but we all know that they will be lining up on day one like everyone else.
I wasn’t referring to you and almost added something to my post to that effect. Your intentions are good and sincere, and you’re making valid points. Certain other posters, however, aren’t being so genuine: for them, the salt-mine talking point is just another opportunity to disparage the retheme.It’s not a strange talking point at all, it’s absolutely relevant. I think changing the theme of Splash is justified (I think the whole thing should be torn down and a new ride built from the foundations up) and I don’t think salt mines will be involved at all. I do think what is being revealed is that certain posters care much more about supporting anything WDW does then they do about the actual historical issues involved in Splash and it’s retheme.
That one Imagineer is the lead on this project though so her words have some weight to them. Again I have to ask though if the ride won't have Salt Mines (which it may not) why bother researching them? It's a waste of money to fly out your team there.Alas, they are mentioned by one of the Imagineers in that video Disney released recently. I wish they hadn’t been, because now we can add “Disney is hypocritical for retheming the ride to slavery-related salt mines” to the list of strange talking points that people have come up with.
My guess is that Disney was trying to convince us of how much research was going into the retheme and that the finished product won’t have anything to do with salt mines. That’s my hope, at any rate.
I wasn’t referring to you and almost added something to my post to that effect. Your intentions are good and sincere, and you’re making valid points. Certain other posters, however, aren’t being so genuine: for them, the salt-mine talking points is just another opportunity to disparage the retheme.
I honestly don’t know. Perhaps because they wanted to address the concern (repeatedly expressed here in this thread and I’m sure elsewhere) about Louisiana’s flatness? I found the whole thing really strange and hope it doesn’t end up having any influence on the final product.Again I have to ask though if the ride won't have Salt Mines (which it may not) why bother researching them? It's a waste of money to fly out your team there. Also as someone who doesn't want the retheme even I think trying to tie the 1920s to slavery is grasping at straws.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.