News Splash Mountain retheme to Princess and the Frog - Tiana's Bayou Adventure

Status
Not open for further replies.

Californian Elitist

Well-Known Member
All im saying is this and i will stand by this statement…. There were NO serious plans to replace Splash with Tiana at any point before the social media semi outrage until someone can prove me wrong i will stand by my statement. A company who literally is cheaper than cheap at times and have far more problems was planning on wasting money overhauling literally one of the most popular rides in the MK?!? You truly believe that?!?
You’re wrong, according to a very reputable insider here.

But you’re free to believe in whatever conspiracy theory you want.😁👍🏾
 

yensidtlaw1969

Well-Known Member
All im saying is this and i will stand by this statement…. There were NO serious plans to replace Splash with Tiana at any point before the social media semi outrage until someone can prove me wrong i will stand by my statement. A company who literally is cheaper than cheap at times and have far more problems was planning on wasting money overhauling literally one of the most popular rides in the MK?!? You truly believe that?!?
Making baseless claims and insisting they're true unless someone can prove you wrong is . . . not how the burden of proof works.

It has been verified both internally and externally that Disney was working on this prior to 2020. You're not gonna get better proof than that. Choosing not to believe it is your prerogative, but it doesn't make you right.
 
Last edited:

crazy4disney

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
No
Making baseless claims and insisting they're true unless someone can prove you wrong is . . . not how the burden of proof works.

It has been verified both internally and externally that Disney was working on this prior to 2020. You're not gonna get better proof than that. Choosing not to believe it is your prerogative, but it doesn't make you right.
I must have missed the press release by Iger or Eisner that this was seriously being replaced.
Last i checked with the countless pages regarding this matter people have also said this was not on table seriously until the kneejerk reaction a couple years ago. So again. Im not saying im right or wrong. Im saying i dont believe for 1 second they were seriously planning on replacing one of its most popular attractions with Tiana in Florida & wasting all this money.
 

yensidtlaw1969

Well-Known Member
I must have missed the press release by Iger or Eisner that this was seriously being replaced.
Last i checked with the countless pages regarding this matter people have also said this was not on table seriously until the kneejerk reaction a couple years ago. So again. Im not saying im right or wrong. Im saying i dont believe for 1 second they were seriously planning on replacing one of its most popular attractions with Tiana in Florida & wasting all this money.
Literally the first line of the first press in June 2020 release calls it "a project Imagineers have been working on since last year":


Splash Mountain as we know it has been hovering near the chopping block for years, for a number of reasons. That has since been corroborated by people here who have long-proven track records. Meanwhile the only source for the project being a kneejerk reaction to a twitterstorm is random people saying "I don't buy it", "I just have a feeling", and "Trust me, bro".
 

DisneyHead123

Well-Known Member
I think it's arguable that Frozen is a better attraction even in a vacuum. I'm inclined to give the slight nod to Maelstrom because the going backwards scene actually made sense in the context of the ride and having the boats appear outside the attraction was a nice touch.

FEA has always felt unfinished to me -- like they were maybe 3/4 done and then decided to just open it instead of finishing off all the detailing for the scenes. But overall, Maelstrom was not a very good attraction and neither is FEA. It doesn't really matter (at least to me) which one is "better" when neither are worth much.

Regardless, I couldn't agree more with your final clause. And the fact that they've decided to just clone FEA for other parks is nearly as bad as the original decision.
I think Maelstrom had that “hidden gem” factor going for it. I remember being a kid in Epcot and thinking “bah, I’m in the land of educational rides!” Then lo and behold, tucked away where you weren’t really expecting it (especially in the pre-internet era because you couldn’t Google it) was this surprisingly neat ride. Frozen is just the opposite - super high expectations regarding some of Disney’s most well known IP. (I found it a bit meh but to be fair, maybe it plays better to kids? Kinda like the sugary kid’s cereal of rides?)
 

Ghost93

Well-Known Member
I'm sure Splash was considered to be rethemed before 2020 as the company was becoming increasingly concerned about its Song of the South ties, but the George Floyd protests simply escalated the timeline and caused Disney to announce the project way earlier than anticipated. Disney probably would have announced the retheme around 2024 had it not been for the protests.
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
I must have missed the press release by Iger or Eisner that this was seriously being replaced.
Last i checked with the countless pages regarding this matter people have also said this was not on table seriously until the kneejerk reaction a couple years ago. So again. Im not saying im right or wrong. Im saying i dont believe for 1 second they were seriously planning on replacing one of its most popular attractions with Tiana in Florida & wasting all this money.
1658977740659.png
 

TwilightZone

Well-Known Member
Boy what happened to believing the trusted insiders on here? Have they really uploaded so infrequently that people just forget how accurate they are? :(
 

crazy4disney

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
No
Literally the first line of the first press in June 2020 release calls it "a project Imagineers have been working on since last year":


Splash Mountain as we know it has been hovering near the chopping block for years, for a number of reasons. That has since been corroborated by people here who have long-proven track records. Meanwhile the only source for the project being a kneejerk reaction to a twitterstorm is random people saying "I don't buy it", "I just have a feeling", and "Trust me, bro".
I know companies never lie for PR purposes....
 

EagleScout610

Owner of a RKF - Resting Kermit Face
Premium Member
All im saying is this and i will stand by this statement…. There were NO serious plans to replace Splash with Tiana at any point before the social media semi outrage until someone can prove me wrong i will stand by my statement. A company who literally is cheaper than cheap at times and have far more problems was planning on wasting money overhauling literally one of the most popular rides in the MK?!? You truly believe that?!?
Given the controversial history of Song of the South, I have no doubt there were plans drafted yet shelved to replace Splash
 

crazy4disney

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
No
I think Disney has plans for everything as been reported but as we see with even announced plans plenty never happen. I dont think anything serious was in the works before what we saw 2 years ago. Its my opinion especially when they have so many others places that $ could have been used for..
 

crazy4disney

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
No
You have zero proof they lied.

We have plenty of people with known connections to upper Disney management say they didn't lie.

So, you can keep reposting your conspiracy "opinion" as much as you want. There's not an audience here that will believe you.
Personally dont care who believes me or not. Im still entitled to my opinion. As is anyone else who have felt the same way…

Great PR move tho making believe they are removing this bc its a problem when its nothing more than another ride that was heavy on AA and maintenance i would believe.

Either way as i said. I will believe what i want. Do i believe there were “plans” 100% were they serious? I highly doubt it.

So feel free to call me all the names you want. And i would bet there are plenty of people here that may believe the same as i do.
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
Personally dont care who believes me or not. Im still entitled to my opinion. As is anyone else who have felt the same way…

Great PR move tho making believe they are removing this bc its a problem when its nothing more than another ride that was heavy on AA and maintenance i would believe.

Either way as i said. I will believe what i want. Do i believe there were “plans” 100% were they serious? I highly doubt it.

So feel free to call me all the names you want. And i would bet there are plenty of people here that may believe the same as i do.
Okee dokee.
 

James Alucobond

Well-Known Member
Personally dont care who believes me or not. Im still entitled to my opinion. As is anyone else who have felt the same way…



Either way as i said. I will believe what i want. Do i believe there were “plans” 100% were they serious? I highly doubt it.
You can believe whatever you want, but if you have literally nothing to present as evidence that supports your point, you shouldn’t peddle it as anything other than a baseless gut feeling rather than attempting to mask your lack of evidence with a vague assertion that this is how PR works.

Additionally, this is a discussion forum. If you want to post opinions and don’t want feedback or input, you can put it in your blog.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom