I expect the permanent closure of the original Splash Mountain will occur sometime in 2023. They want it open during the 50th-anniversary celebration.Any word yet on when or even IF they are still doing this retheme? I have been watching for closures during our trip in October.
It's most likely they will, but it's the when that nobody knowsAny word yet on when or even IF they are still doing this retheme? I have been watching for closures during our trip in October.
I never said they wanted nor cared about getting rid of SOTS before 2019. The PatF retheme was sort of a concept they had floating around as an eventual possibility, but it wasn't until the George Floyd protests and Twitter getting mad about the Song of the South theme that Disney made the announcement.Again, you keep saying this but there's no proof Disney wanted nor cared about getting rid of SOTS until after 2019.
Allow me to play devil advocate for a moment but I think it's possible that's 2019 was when the idea got past the "Oh that costs too much" filter and into the "Maybe someday" category but then got rushed out waaaayy too early (As in I believe we were supposed to either 1st hear it this year or next) because of 2020 in general.Again, you keep saying this but there's no proof Disney wanted nor cared about getting rid of SOTS until after 2019.
This is my position as well. I’m also not entirely sure WDW’s was ever entirely intended to be “swept in” initially due to thematic integrity issues. Similar to the Guardians/ToT revamp. With DL probably serving as an initial test.Allow me to play devil advocate for a moment but I think it's possible that's 2019 was when the idea got past the "Oh that costs too much" filter and into the "Maybe someday" category but then got rushed out waaaayy too early (As in I believe we were supposed to either 1st hear it this year or next) because of 2020 in general.
I think you hit the nail on the head. Throughout the late 90s and 2000s, Disney had contemplated potentially releasing Song of the South on DVD with a host providing a disclaimer and a plethora of special features. Around 2006/2007 the movement to get the movie released on home video really picked up and Bob Iger said he would consider it. Ultimately though, the company decided it would not be the best move. A DVD release became less likely in the late 2000s and by 2017 it was pretty much confirmed that Disney wanted to cut all ties with the film.It’s a very simple premise: streaming platforms and investors are desperate for content. When TWDC indicated they that SoTS was “too problematic” to place on their platform (even with a content warning label) in 2017 it was the first tell-tale signal that the company was divorcing itself of the property permanently. From a corporate synergy perspective promoting a property that is not on Disney+ is a huge no-no which was really the death knell for any iteration of the Brers.
If Disney doesn't eventually change Splash Mountain at Magic Kingdom, the media will eventually start running negative articles about it. Disney can drag its feet with the retheme, but if it ever gives the illusion that the retheme has been canceled there will be pushback.I still feel like this will happen in CA first, before it ever happens or sees the light of day here, if it does. Although at the rate dictator chapek is going it wouldn't surprise me if he demanded small world removed for a boat ride through screens showing disney plus promos. yes Im joking, but... that's just how bad he is coming across. Of course the other end of the spectrum is they dont want to spend money on expensive changes like that, so could our splash be saved by that theory? possible.
whatever happened to the tokyo rumor about whatever they did or didn't do with theirs has to be the same with ours?
This. Disney had one last chance with D+ to rescue the property but instead decided to stick the final nail in the coffin. That's why even if they admitted the movie was fine tomorrow, remade it and dropped it, it'd still have the title of "That racist Disney movie that they didn't put on D+"It’s a very simple premise: streaming platforms and investors are desperate for content. When TWDC indicated they that SoTS was “too problematic” to place on their platform (even with a content warning label) in 2017 it was the first tell-tale signal that the company was divorcing itself of the property permanently. From a corporate synergy perspective promoting a property that is not on Disney+ is a huge no-no which was really the death knell for any iteration of the Brers.
They wanted to have Tokyo retheme their Splash based on the MK version since the two rides are the same but mirrored. Tokyo told them to "Pound sand"whatever happened to the Tokyo rumor about whatever they did or didn't do with theirs has to be the same with ours?
Tokyo doesn't care about our cultural issues.Pirates of the Caribbean in Tokyo is going under a very long refurbishment. I wonder if the auction scene is going to be removed. If it is, I would imagine Splash might be the next thing eventually. I'm not sure if Tokyo can keep it forever.
There’s a huge difference between switching out a scene and a full ride. Having a Brer Rabbit attraction also isn’t much of a concern for Japan, as they just look at it as cute animals and interesting Americana.Pirates of the Caribbean in Tokyo is going under a very long refurbishment. I wonder if the auction scene is going to be removed. If it is, I would imagine Splash might be the next thing eventually. I'm not sure if Tokyo can keep it forever.
I think you hit the nail on the head. Throughout the late 90s and 2000s, Disney had contemplated potentially releasing Song of the South on DVD with a host providing a disclaimer and a plethora of special features. Around 2006/2007 the movement to get the movie released on home video really picked up and Bob Iger said he would consider it. Ultimately though, the company decided it would not be the best move. A DVD release became less likely in the late 2000s and by 2017 it was pretty much confirmed that Disney wanted to cut all ties with the film.
That's different than what some insiders originally said, which was they wanted Tokyo to pay for their own retheme in the image of what is being done in the states... not paying for MK's retheme as well as their own.They wanted to have Tokyo pay for MK's retheme in addition to their own since the two rides are the same but mirrored. Tokyo told them to "Pound sand"
I think I had gotten it mixed up as to why Tokyo was out.That's different than what some insiders originally said, which was they wanted Tokyo to pay for their own retheme in the image of what is being done in the states... not paying for MK's retheme as well as their own.
Do you have a source that Tokyo was asked to pay for two parks' retheme?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.