Anybody arguing so heavily against Tiana fitting in to Frontierland just doesn't want her represented there in the first place. Her setting makes more sense in Critter Country or Frontierlnd than euro-centric Fantasyland.
So where is a better fit? I don't think Fantasyland would make much sense because nothing there takes place in America. Main Street wouldn't make sense and doesn't have thrill or dark rides. On the banks of the Rivers of America makes a great setting.That would be a sweeping generalization. I think you can want her represented while at the same time thinking Frontierland is a poor fit. There is no need to group people as if they do not want representation.
What are you talking about? Most of the songs are from the 1950s and 1960s, not the 1850s and 1860s.Which is set up as a revue to the frontier. Princess and The Frog is the wrong time and atmosphere.
Except what to do with the huge log ride mountain based on a movie they don’t stand behind anymore.
Oh! I meant to replace it. Like close current Splash, and put the new Splash in Fantasyland. I have a ludicrous armchair-imagineered thought process but it is doable.Except the one they’re trying to get rid of: a ride based on Song of the South.
Fantasyland is the land where all the cartoon movie characters show up, that's all there really is to it. The other lands are dedicated to various themes and did not have any rides based on the animated movies. That has changed since opening day (including with Splash!) and I would like to see Frontierland go back to being about Westward Expansion (good and bad).So where is a better fit? I don't think Fantasyland would make much sense because nothing there takes place in America. Main Street wouldn't make sense and doesn't have thrill or dark rides. On the banks of the Rivers of America makes a great setting.
True. Country Bears is clearly a spoof of 50s-70s country music. As a Tennessean and a musician I don't really like the depictions of the bears as saying country musicians are stupid. One lyric about the song only having three chords and being in the good ole key of G implies that country and folk music is basic and takes no real skill, when it really does take a great deal of natural ability and I am often more impressed with country and folk musicians and their natural musicianship than say the classically trained.What are you talking about? Most of the songs are from the 1950s and 1960s, not the 1850s and 1860s.
They's ain't singing Clementine or Yellow Rose of Texas.
With the riverboat tie-in it seems almost designed when Princess and the Frog was released that it would eventually replace Splash. I have this theory that Disney creates movies to eventually overlay problematic or tired attractions (like Frozen at EPCOT)Fantasyland is the land where all the cartoon movie characters show up, that's all there really is to it. The other lands are dedicated to various themes and did not have any rides based on the animated movies. That has changed since opening day (including with Splash!) and I would like to see Frontierland go back to being about Westward Expansion (good and bad).
You are right though! Tiana and pals will fit in just fine with the riverboat milieu. I'm sure it'll be lovely
This.That would be a sweeping generalization. I think you can want her represented while at the same time thinking Frontierland is a poor fit. There is no need to group people as if they do not want representation.
Fantasyland isn't necessarily a catch all for animation to me, everything is very euro-centic. I'm having trouble thinking of anything set outside of Europe [or the UK] there.
Fantasyland is the land where all the cartoon movie characters show up, that's all there really is to it.
It's a Small World is global, so Fantasyland can be anywhere. Frankly, Neverland (Peter Pan) is also not in Europe, most likely the Caribbean.Oh it's all euro-centric. And in DL the New Orleans theming is obviously not in Fantasyland. That's why Tiana fits PERFECTLY there.
PhilharMagic and IASW are both non-themed and Storybook Circus is themed to a small turn-of-the-century American town. I actually agree that Europe is the main geographic theme in Fantasyland. As far as armchair-WDI there's some finagling that could make New Orleans fit.
(edit: I really like PatF by the way. Probably top 5 Disney movies. I love the music and the culture that it borrows from, and the characters are great. Just don't think it's a thematic fit. Feel the same way about SotS which I actually want to be removed.)
Got it!Oh! I meant to replace it. Like close current Splash, and put the new Splash in Fantasyland. I have a ludicrous armchair-imagineered thought process but it is doable.
Got it!
I actually like that the attraction is staying where it is. I think it's appropriate and meaningful that a land designed around the formation of the USA is going to give such prominence to a character who represents (albeit in highly romanticised terms) the tenacity and success of African Americans emerging from the legacies of slavery. Tiana is very much pushing the frontiers.
I love the film. I don't have any special connection to Splash, nor do I take offense to it, but am aware of the troubling history of the film.No one, as far as I'm aware, is arguing that PatF isn't worthy of a ride.. or some representation in the parks. I myself enjoyed the movie very much. The message is powerful and inspiring, but overall it was a decent film and the last Disney movie using that animation style, which makes me appreciate it even more.
So we are all going to pretend The Ballad of Davy Crockett isn't absolutely horrifying or....‽Perhaps I’m misunderstanding you, but aren’t most of the bears Southern? Other than “The Ballad of Davy Crockett”, I can’t think of any song in the show that has a frontier feel or theme to it.
What are you talking about? Most of the songs are from the 1950s and 1960s, not the 1850s and 1860s.
They's ain't singing Clementine or Yellow Rose of Texas.
As I’ve said more than once now, I was and remain a big fan of the ride in its current form. I do not think there has ever been a particularly loud call for a retheme (the idea that Disney is bending the knee to an online petition is ludicrous to me), and even insiders have told us that the initial plan was meant only for Disneyland and had nothing to do with social issues. But events of the last year or so have understandably shifted the conversation, and Disney made a preemptive decision to get rid of an IP whose dormant issues might one day become a real source of controversy. My own personal attachment to the current Splash Mountain notwithstanding, I believe the retheme has tremendous potential, not only as a ride but also as a statement of inclusivity. What you characterise as a sickening new culture is, to my mind, simply another moment in the long history of social change that predates us all by millennia and will continue long after we’re all gone.I admit, I didn't read the previous conversations this specific message is responding to. But i'd like to jump in and branch out with my own 2 cents.
No one, as far as I'm aware, is arguing that PatF isn't worthy of a ride.. or some representation in the parks. I myself enjoyed the movie very much. The message is powerful and inspiring, but overall it was a decent film and the last Disney movie using that animation style, which makes me appreciate it even more.
The problem is it's replacing a 30+ year old legend that doesn't deserve to be treated like this. No one for over 30 years cared it used characters in SotS. It didn't in one bit tarnish Disney's reputation, but instead strengthened it as one of the best attractions ever. It's sudden place in the crosshairs of our new culture is frankly sickening to me.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.