Ponderer
Well-Known Member
Never have, never will, and no - that does not take skill.
Then you do it. If it takes no skill, sounds like an easy way to make a bundle and, oh! The prestige. What person would turn that opportunity down?
Never have, never will, and no - that does not take skill.
Other than losing Splash Mountain to political correctness
Also not to get too off-topic but Rothko is largely important due to the size and presentation of his works and his value as a representation of a certain time in art history. If someone else painted something similar today it would fall flat.
I guess we're kind of drifting here, but I always enjoy going to art galleries more than museums when I travel as I think it gives you a nice insight into the changing ways people thought about all sorts of topics over time. That includes the nature and function of art in society. As I think most people know, abstract art was an important tool used by the US government during the Cold War to promote the idea of freedom of expression under capitalism versus the conformity imposed under communism represented in social(ist) realism. Growing up I knew about Jackson Pollock's Blue Poles because it was such a controversy that a progressive Australian government paid so much for it in 1973... almost ten years before I was born! So, art and politics are all interwoven very interestingly with their different historical periods.People will always have a hard time looking at something like a Rothko or a Jackson Pollock and thinking it has any value because it doesn't take obvious skill. It's much easier to look at a Vermeer or a Raphael or whatever and know you couldn't paint something like it, at least not without a lot of study and practice.
I personally find very little of interest in Rothko, Pollock, Warhol, et al. and like to spend my time in art museums mainly on pre-20th century art, but there is a reason those artists are represented in museums.
I agree! Or what if Dr. Facilier is up to his normal shenanigans and Tiana is shepherding the guests through the bayou back to NOLA to celebrate Mardi Gras? A storyline consistent with what we know about characters, an adventure and a way to weave it into the existing ride track with obvious atmospheric changes.I didn't read the pitch as being Tiana was starting a tour company or anything. You're just accompanying her through the bayou. Not really sure why people seem to find this so out of character. She spent a lot of time there in the film and this takes place after the film, so the idea she would go back doesn't seem like some kind of bizarre left turn.
Put me in the camp of, "not art".Good grief. I never understand people making definitive statements about art or the skill required.
Which looks nothing like Splash Mountain or Chickapin Hill.
True, but Driskill Mountain is quite far from New Orleans.Louisiana also has mountains by the way. And the tallest mountain in LA is about 200 ft or so, which is taller than Splash. That's not accounting for forced perspective, etc but it's technically okay.
True, but Driskill Mountain is quite far from New Orleans.
Frontierland extends into the twentieth century (and into the South) with the Country Bears.And the time period of Princess and The Frog is more Main Street USA than Frontierland.
Except what to do with the huge log ride mountain based on a movie they don’t stand behind anymore.All of the above is true. I maintain if they're gonna do Tiana Mountain (which is fine!) They should build it somewhere else, preferably Fantasyland where all the other animated-movie stuff is. Solves a lot of problems.
Except the one they’re trying to get rid of: a ride based on Song of the South.All of the above is true. I maintain if they're gonna do Tiana Mountain (which is fine!) They should build it somewhere else, preferably Fantasyland where all the other animated-movie stuff is. Solves a lot of problems.
Ha! You beat me to it by seconds.Except what to do with the huge log ride mountain based on a movie they don’t stand behind anymore.
Just because you don't like something does not mean it lacks skill or merit.
This looks like it was painted by a 12 year old, but is actually a $90 million painting that is one of the most highly regarded abstract paintings of it's era:
View attachment 582227
Have you ever seen a Rothko in person? It's a completely different experience and absolutely took skill.
Frontierland extends into the twentieth century (and into the South) with the Country Bears.
I do think Princess and the Frog is pushing it, but you already had the weird incongruity of pre-Civil War Tom Sawyer Island set against the Reconstruction era of Splash Mountain.Which is set up as a revue to the frontier. Princess and The Frog is the wrong time and atmosphere.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.