aw14
Well-Known Member
no more so than how "its a wonderful life" portrays the happiness of the Jews during the era of the holocaust.The romanticisation of plantation life doesn’t strike you as problematic?
no more so than how "its a wonderful life" portrays the happiness of the Jews during the era of the holocaust.The romanticisation of plantation life doesn’t strike you as problematic?
WOAH...Did somebody actually write those comments about Brer Fox and Brer Bear?
Who was it?
no more so than how "its a wonderful life" portrays the happiness of the Jews during the era of the holocaust.
Other options were explored, as laid out in this fascinating discussion (which was written over a decade ago and isn’t a hit piece):
Song of the South That Never Was
www.mouseplanet.com
your point?Did It's A Wonderful Life take place in Germany?
Matt Black, post 4, 488 on page 226. He also said that Bear Fox was a negative stereotype of African Americans
no more so than how "its a wonderful life" portrays the happiness of the Jews during the era of the holocaust.
that was what I meant- sorryI assume you mean Life is Beautiful. I haven’t seen it, but if there are indeed issues in its handling of the subject, I don’t see how that undermines my point.
Again, I did not say that. I said it was evocative of stereotypes, in the same way that the goblins from Harry Potter are evocative of stereotypes of Jewish people. Again, I don't think in either case this was deliberate, but it shows how racial bias can seep into everyday life.
If the child happens to be a minority, sometimes it's someone else's racist parents who teach them.
I can’t read it right now. I was just asking for an opinion.
that was what I meant- sorry
Yes there were issues, of which the academy awards ignored.
The family members that were in the camp were happy/laughing, etc..there was context that goes into that as well.
my point being- people aren't out protesting Life is Beautiful, nor should they. Hell, SotS hasn't been available in decades, people are likely no longer out protesting it, just a ride that draws no connection to it in its current formAs I said, I don’t see how this undermines my point about Song of the South. Many films, old and new, have issues.
my point being- people aren't out protesting Life is Beautiful, nor should they. Hell, SotS hasn't been available in decades, people are likely no longer out protesting it, just a ride that draws no connection to it in its current form
my point being- people aren't out protesting Life is Beautiful, nor should they. Hell, SotS hasn't been available in decades, people are likely no longer out protesting it, just a ride that draws no connection to it in its current form
and again- SotS is not in Splash, so that point isn't accurateIf a family theme park created an attraction with characters derived from Life is Beautiful, I imagine that too could cause issues somewhere down the line.
I Disney rides are expected to provide history lessons or teaching moments, maybe we’re asking too much from them. Just don’t model a ride based on Merchant of Venice and you have no problem.
There also existed African-American inventors, entrepreneurs, law makers, cowboys, etc. They tend to show up less in the movies of the time. Funny, that.
Me: We should take steps to recognize the ways in which biases, prejudices, and stereotypes can unconsciously influence creative works.
You: Does that me we should remove everything?
Me: ...
absolutely not. Personally, I am for a more "inclusive" approach. Meaning, that these become teachable moments for professional educators. Explain the time, the context, etc...ignoring it or banning it doesn't mean it didn't exist.Do you think the Merchant of Venice should be banned from schools?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.