dig311dug
Well-Known Member
@LittleBuford : PatF romanticized the Jim Crow era south... would you have a 10 year old avoid that as well?
Influenced for sure. But not in the way of how they view human relations. More in the way of “Wow, that Rabbit was cute, funny, and smart. I’ll jump around and be just like him.”The idea that children are influenced by the films and shows they watch is hardly newfangled. Having been a child myself, I can vouch for its validity.
@LittleBuford : PatF romanticized the Jim Crow era south... would you have a 10 year old avoid that as well?
To put it another way, would I feel comfortable having my young niece and nephew watch The Princess and a Frog with a black friend? Absolutely. And Song of the South? Absolutely not.
If I ever have kids, I’ll show it to them. To me, it’s a movie about Brer Rabbit, the things he would do to get out of a jam, and how it can influence and help a small child learning to adapt to their surroundings.Depends on age tbh. I would t ha e had a problem showing my daughter at 12-13 if she expressed interest.
Influenced for sure. But not in the way of how they view human relations. More in the way of “Wow, that Rabbit was cute, funny, and smart. I’ll jump around and be just like him.”
Strangely racist statement.
"You can't watch this because of the skin color of your friend."
I’m going off my perspective as someone who was a kid not that long ago.We’ll have to agree to disagree on this.
I’m going off my perspective as someone who was a kid not that long ago.
I’m going to have to agree with you right here, although I don’t agree with anything else you’re saying (despite the good intentions).I refuse to engage with people who don’t debate in good faith. Have a good day.
That we never talked about as this was before the re theme was proposedVery interesting, what was their opinion about Splash Mountain before and after watching the film?
Perhaps. But there are children films with issues from that era (including Dumbo) that also have problems. The point is SotS isn't any better or worse than any of the films from that era when it comes to racial stereotypes. By making it a very public exception made it seem worse than it really is.I think the issue is that it’s a children’s film, which those other movies aren’t. That is why it is treated as more problematic than, say, Gone with the Wind. It really isn’t a film that kids should be watching (and I say that as Briton who watched it often as a child).
Are you referring to this thread: https://forums.wdwmagic.com/threads...n-discussion-only.965899/page-62#post-9361618 ?This thread is starting to go down the politics/social issues path. Please do not sentence another thread to the Politics & Social Issues forum!. Thank you.
Are you referring to this thread: https://forums.wdwmagic.com/threads...n-discussion-only.965899/page-62#post-9361618 ?
Yeah, that's why I got a little confusedNever mind - this one ended up in the P&SI forum anyway.
I’m just going to answer this question to save everyone the trouble.How many of you have actually watched Song of the South? It hasn't been available in the US for years.
Also I really don't see how it's very racist? Farms use immigrants to harvest the crops etc. They live in work camps as they work their way around harvesting crops. When you stay at Disney World there are a whole bunch of servants that attend to you. Countless movies and TV shows show rich people with servants and agricultural laborers. What's the difference between SotS and some British show about a family who lives on a grand estate with a house full of servants? That's the way Europe was till about WW2, in fact many places in the world are still run like that. I was in Brazil and had a whole full of servants and guards while the hill side was full of poor people.
I just don't get why SotS is so racist?
I think "problematic" is a better word for Song of the South. I can see why people are offended by it, but you're right that it's not the most racist thing ever like everyone makes it out to be.I’m just going to answer this question to save everyone the trouble.
SotS is racist because people want it to be. No, seriously.
It has just enough surface level stuff (dialect and a few neutral stereotypes) to make it feel dated. People run with that and it becomes Disney’s poster child for how disgusting and racist the company and old Hollywood used to be. And Disney benefits from it too because all of the racially insensitive jokes in their more popular films and franchise can now slide under the radar.
As a society, we love to trash our distant past to put ourselves on a pedestal because the people who would fight back against us are now dead. Sometimes we’re right. Sometimes we’re just as bad if not worse.
TL;DR SotS isn’t racist, but few people care about it and it has just enough dated stuff needed for it to be the sacrificial lamb for the Disney Company to make their modern self look better. By calling it racist, we think we are holding Disney accountable for their “racist” past, but we’re really just ignorant clowns who have absolutely no idea what we’re talking about.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.