That may be the case.
But the more important question is... why?
Why is a TDO exec more motivated than other company execs to "value engineer"?
Bonus pay for cost-savings? That's sounds reasonable, but wouldn't TDA execs have the same motivation at the West Coast parks?
Unique budget challenges? Since a TDO exec is not given a limitless budget, do they have to spread their money around in ways different than TDA (for example, more of budget must go to infrastructure and utilities that is not required in Anaheim?)
I also question how all of us can scream and moan when we hear rumors of "value engineering" and yet the big bosses in Burbank don't seem to mind. I'm sure Staggs and Iger don't micro-manage every WDW decision. That's what they pay the TDO execs to do, after all. But why doesn't Burbank seem as concerned as us fans do? This is the same Burbank that watches over TDA, and the same Burbank that TDO must please. Obviously TDO is not (or at least hasn't been) worried about reprisals from up above by "value engineering".
It's easy to throw stones at particular individuals about funding decisions. And maybe such criticism is warranted. But what motivates them to make those decisions? And why is the infamous "One Disney" so different in the exec offices on both coasts?