Spirited News, Observations & Thoughts IV

Status
Not open for further replies.

Animaniac93-98

Well-Known Member
Since no one under the age of 18 is allowed in gambling casino's...how will this have any effect on kids? Since no one under the age of 18 is allowed to purchase lottery tickets, how will this have any effect on kids?

I wasn't talking about casinos, but media in the form of movies/TV.
 

flynnibus

Premium Member
I have no idea, but it doesn't matter (except for argument sake).

When one company, especially one with TWDC's 'reputation' , takes over another it is common for one entity to shed arrangements/units that the new parent finds incompatable with its business as a whole.

It is germane - because your concern ignores that the company explicitly said it would not meddle in marvels core. Right from the get go everyone knew so much of the core marvel library did not fit the traditional Disney image.

Are you as equally surprised Disney has not jettisoned Marvel's 'un-disney' characters and storylines?
 

nytimez

Well-Known Member
Since no one under the age of 18 is allowed in gambling casino's...how will this have any effect on kids? Since no one under the age of 18 is allowed to purchase lottery tickets, how will this have any effect on kids?

There are a lot of posts in this thread and I don't read them all myself so it's possible you missed it - but the Marvel gambling license extends to online gambling.
 

ParentsOf4

Well-Known Member
The DVC dues include maintenance and taxes. A DVC member has a long term (40+ years) property lease, but they don't own any property. They don't have fee simple title. Disney maintains fee simple title on all DVC property. Yet the club members pay the full amount for property tax. Shifting the tax burden to the club members is genius. Walt would have loved the idea!
Disney doesn't pay any taxes. Ultimately, it's the "guest" that pays all taxes.

In the case of a cash room, Disney passes its tax burden onto the "guest" via higher room rates and then takes the tax credit for the tax that effectively was paid by the "guest".

In the case of a DVC room, the DVC member pays those taxes through their annual Maintenance Fee. It's the DVC member that then gets to take the tax deduction, not Disney.
 

Captain Neo

Well-Known Member
Way to go, Matt. Again twisting two points together. (BTW, do you get alerts in your pants when I post since it seems like you don't post much when I am not around ... nah, sure that's just a coincidence!)

If you have a contract that you can produce between Disney and WMS, I'd love to see it. Of course, even Disney breaks contracts or pays to get out of them. They are staunchly anti-gaming, so one would be hard put to fathom how they would possibly want to see Spidey on a brand new slot machine (one that could easily attract the eyes of children walking thru a casino to get to their room or have dinner with their folks).

Marvel had a deal to build a theme park in Dubai. That came to an end very quickly when Disney took over.

Marvel had a deal with Paramount Pictures to distribute The Avengers and Iron Man 3. That came to an end when Disney took over.

Disney bought Marvel in 2009. It is 2013. Oh, and slot machine distrubuters generally have short term deals with specific IP because if a machine isn't popular on a casino floor, they want to replace it with something else.

Here's the press release on the new Spidey machine (funny how The Disney Parks Blog didn't mention this!)
http://now.wms.com/winninglines/2012/09/spider-man-swings-into-action/

Disney is again being hypocritical and hoping no one looks closer. I doubt the O-Town Sentinel will. Maybe someone should Tweet Jason Garcia?

That Spider-Man Slot machine is clearly based on the Spider man films which would mean that it was approved by Sony not Disney
 

Rodan75

Well-Known Member
I think this tread has jumped the spirit. Time for Spirited news V: the Empire Strikes Back

So are the decision makers on Parks projects in decision mode,or have they started to clamp down on their WDI leak machine? (Or are they all on vacation?). Beginning to feel like only the most disgruntled of TWDC folks are talking anymore. The leaks seem to be slowing on the Uni side too...
 

WDW1974

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
I don't know why they are being all shady and in the closet with it. They need to just be out in the open with it. The only reason why I can't convince my husband to go on a DCL is because they DON'T have gambling on the ships!

That is one thing that sets DCL apart. And they have made a very big deal about it (again: Disney says gambling is bad and not a family business). I am not big on gambling because I once had a top Vegas casino exec tell me that using his slots was throwing my money out. I figured he knew what he was talking about. Blackjack is OK in small doses as is sports gaming. But I don't take a cruise to gamble. I never use the casinos when take lines that have them.
 

WDW1974

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Touchstone movies dealt with all sorts of seedy topics. I don't think that prostitution and Disney go together at all, but Pretty Women is still a damn good film and I don't think the company was hypocritical by making it.

This gambling talk seems to me to be a complete non-issue. Disney has from day one not marketed Marvel in the same "family friendly" way as they do for their Disney branded stuff. If there were a Sleeping Beauty or a Lion King slot machine, I think you'd have a stronger point, but Marvel is perceived as more adult and gritty. I mean, the violence you find in the typical comic book or the movies is pretty at odds with the family image that Disney promotes. I mean, should Disney just get rid of The Punisher as a character?

At the end of the day (today), all I can really say is you are missing the point. I don't think it's deliberate on your part, you just don't get it.

And I am not going to make you get it. I can tell you as someone who has followed Disney and gambling for decades that this really is a huge deal and if you don't see it, then you don't.

These are Disney characters marketed largely to children that are being used in gambling activities. You either get why that is potentially devastating to the company or you don't.

But I can practically guarantee you of one thing: and that is if a major media outlet exposed this hypocrisy on Disney's part those machines and lotto deals would end very quickly.
 

WDW1974

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Oh, as an aside, I've seen Star Wars themed slots in casinos as well and I would fully expect those licensing deals to continue into the future too.

I have heard of these as well. But Disney just bought Lucasfilm. And it could sever those ties as well.

It has owned Marvel for four years now. Those lotto deals were made in the last few years as were many of these other licensing choices.
 

ParentsOf4

Well-Known Member
Spirit has returned and I'm sure he doesn't want pages of bickering over DVC on his thread so I'll leave it at this. You guys are nickel and dining the whole argument. Picking apart little pieces where Disney may profit from the DVC dues. I don't want to spend any more time going back and forth on that. Here is my opinion simply put: the lion share of the profits from selling DVC come from the selling of the original points. That is the economic incentive for Disney. A quick earnings boost that is a bit short sighted, but still hugely profitable. If people are of the opinion that the real profits from DVC lie in the "hidden gains" from collecting dues than so be it. They are entitled to an opinion and a theory. Maybe they are right and I am wrong. Maybe Disney doesn't plan to do anything with the parks since they are making huge windfall profits from management fees, interest on capital reserve funds and spreading costs to DVC owners.
Let's use a simple example at Bay Lake Tower (BLT) vs. the Contemporary.

We have a family that wants to vacation annually during February break in a Deluxe Resort. They want to stay in a Magic Kingdom View room at either BLT or the Contemporary. They can pay cash every year or buy DVC.

Because it's during Spring Break, WDW rarely offers "Room Only" discounts. They don't need to; WDW is very popular during Spring Break. In 2014, a Magic Kingdom View room at the Contemporary costs $5337/week or $762/night. (For one ordinary hotel room!) Even if by a stroke of good fortune they somehow manage to score a 30% "Room Only" discount for Spring Break, it's still $534/night!

Incrementally, it costs Disney about $30/night to service that one room. With or without discount, Disney is making a boatload of money off that family in just one week (either $5127 or $3528, depending on whether they were able to obtain a "Room Only" discount.).

Instead, that family decides to take the DVC plunge and foolishly agree to pay Disney's ridiculous direct price of $165/point for BLT. It's going to take 183 points to stay in a comparable room at BLT, or a purchase price of $30,195. Disney is making some serious money off them without even a single stay.

After that, Disney collects an annual Maintenance Fee (MF) of $4.50/point. For 183 points, that's $824, a fraction of what the cash room costs and an even smaller fraction of what they paid upfront. So, even if you want to pretend that half the MF is "profit" (which it's not), Disney is making hundreds on DVC MF vs. thousands on a cash room vs. tens of thousands on the initial DVC purchase.

So, to your point @GoofGoof , DVC's profits are heavily frontloaded. With DVC, Disney sacrifices long-term profits for short-term profits.
 

WDW1974

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
It is germane - because your concern ignores that the company explicitly said it would not meddle in marvels core. Right from the get go everyone knew so much of the core marvel library did not fit the traditional Disney image.

Are you as equally surprised Disney has not jettisoned Marvel's 'un-disney' characters and storylines?

That's not germane at all.

Disney has often put out films with adult themes (Snow White to start with). I recently watched Atlantis (2001) for the first time and saw they had a major character smoking (often). But Disney isn't about to get in bed with Big Tobacco are they?

Comics are aimed largely at boys. Boys who can not by law use slot machines or buy lotto tickets.

I know you like to dance, but you must see the difference.
 

WDW1974

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
That Spider-Man Slot machine is clearly based on the Spider man films which would mean that it was approved by Sony not Disney

Nope.

Ultimately, Disney has control over all the characters in terms of how they are used. It is the same with the theme park deal with UNI.

Sony could decide that Spidey was going to moonlight as a gay prostitute and get hooked on meth and that film would never get made.
 

WDW1974

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
I think this tread has jumped the spirit. Time for Spirited news V: the Empire Strikes Back

So are the decision makers on Parks projects in decision mode,or have they started to clamp down on their WDI leak machine? (Or are they all on vacation?). Beginning to feel like only the most disgruntled of TWDC folks are talking anymore. The leaks seem to be slowing on the Uni side too...

No, I don't see a Spirited V.

And nothing, to my knowledge has changed, for both Disney and UNI.

There will be a Disney announcement (definitely Anaheim, but likely Florida as well) in the next six weeks or so.
 

WDW1974

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
I think you don't know marvel

The question isn't whether I know marvel (and I do). The question is do you know Disney and its history and stance on gambling?

If you do, then this is very simple and we stop dancing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom