You're right, I should have figured that out...
For the record, I hate neckties, I had a no tie policy at my own wedding.
I have a job where I only have to dress up 2 or 3 times a year.
You're right, I should have figured that out...
For the record, I hate neckties, I had a no tie policy at my own wedding.
My memory has led me astray several times as well so I understand that feeling. Also, you should bold and italicize EXTREMELY EMBARRASSING INCIDENT, just 'cause.Yes, I have become aware of that.
My memory has led me astray several times as well so I understand that feeling. Also, you should bold and italicize EXTREMELY EMBARRASSING INCIDENT, just 'cause.
I still struggle with the concept that most Orlando bound vacationeers really care to trek out to the hinterlands for Legoland. If they cater to locals, maybe
Yes, I have become aware of that. I'm actually surprised at the amount of posts that my ramblings about the end of the ride, the partly remembered endings, and my "false memory" have created. I've had an epiphany about all this and my view of the KS story, but in order to increase readership, I will reveal that an EXTREMELY EMBARRASSING INCIDENT from earlier in my life will be revealed somewhere in the midst of this post. So, we all, on occasion, remember things incorrectly. I know this, yet, when I have trouble remembering things or recalling where I got certain ideas from, I don't look things up in advance since I feel it gives my posts a weird veracity. Plus, it gives you and folk such as @marni1971, reason to correct me.
If you're the O-Town Biz Journal and you run a blog post such as that (was it in print too?), you don't do so without vetting the information through your own sources first. No matter what skeptical 'tinge' you place on it, it speaks to the veracity of the information placed there or why else would you even bother doing so? I would suggest that the writer is playing it safe with the skepticism, aware of the big rodent in town.
And UNI is going after Disney. It is no secret. Perhaps, the extent of which may be to some but by 2015 it will be VERY clear. Harsh truth here, I would be very surprised if the writer ran that piece without FIRST getting comfirmation of much/all of what I posted from his sources ... his sources at DISNEY! Yep, they do know what's coming.
Boy, I can't wait to hear the Disney fanbois talking about 2021 and WDW's 50th and how they'll have to add real major attractions for that! (Oh, wait, a fanboi minion just whispered in my ear -- get the tongue out -- that they already have started with that!)
Part of the problem with this is that the biggest alternative energy companies, those with the money to spend on such exhibits, are colloquially known as Big Oil. I think a lot of people would roll their eyes at the solar panel exhibit sponsored by BP.This is where EPCOT should step in. Instead of silly exhibitions about how to keep fires out of the house and how to make your own video game, they should be hosting exhibits from electric car companies, and new age energy companies.
In my youth, Communicores inspired me to care about electrical engineering and computers. The current exhibits do none of that...
You may think so, but that would be wrong. Legoland is exceeding even the most optimistic attendance projections from the company. A 45 minute drive for most people in the country is nothing. Legoland has carved out a nice niche demographic that isn't intrigued by fantasy of Disney and is not quite sold on the thrill rides of Universal (read: young boys).
Legoland has carved out a nice niche demographic that isn't intrigued by fantasy of Disney and is not quite sold on the thrill rides of Universal (read: young boys).
Boardwalk and Baseball is long gone, but that was a great park. Far better than ESPN Zone.
Your photo safari was interrupted as-"something went wrong!"-your guide gets a call that there are poachers who killed an elephant and have captured "Baby Red," a young elephant. You "save" the elephant from the poachers. The elephant is an obvious fake, a cheap AA, which works fine for the Jungle Cruise, but when you put it in at the end of the Safaris, guests went away wondering how many of the other animals they just saw were fakes. Not exactly what you want happening in your very expensive new safari ride, with real animals. And a safari is certainly exciting enough without a lame, preachy "story" about conservation.
It was a hideous pockmark on an otherwise perfect attraction.
Nope ... lasted until previews ... when Eisner saw it.
I don't know which version of Little Red you saw, but it was far from a cheap AA like the Jungle Cruise. It was a fully functional AA figure with over 30 different functions with his trunk having 4 different functions. It was complicated and very difficult to work on because the space in back of the truck and it you had to work on the valve rack, you were laying on your back under the truck. But then they starting to turn off different functions instead repairing it. They used to keep the curtains open on the back of the truck and as it got worse, they just closed the curtains. Then for a long time, they just pretended Little Red was there and it was gone for at least 6 months while they made a cheap copy with maybe 3 pneumatic functions and maybe that was the one you saw.
I'm sorry, but having an overly preachy story about a topic that most people really don't care about (though is an important topic, just not one most care about)...ending with a dead elephant (or even an injured one)...
Really, I go to church to get preached at, not theme parks. Especially since the ride offered nothing but awareness...no real actions an individual could take on the ride to stop real poaching...
It's insulting, preachy, and silly. And should never have been storyboarded. I don't go to Disney to reflect on real world issues, I go to Disney to escape from them.
I will be at the ribbon cutting for Pandora. See you there.
I read an article a few years ago from the OBJ that explained Disney no longer felt it was a good strategy to compete directly with the other resorts in the area. Rather business would be better if they adopted a more 'cooperative' strategy. It was a fascinating article but troubling to me as a believer in competition.
You should really use your connections at the Journal to try and get a copy. I can't find it anywhere but I think it would help you understand better why everything is unfolding as it is. Its author is apparently prophetic.
I think Disney might be under pressure not to bury the competition. They did not want what happened to Microsoft to happen to them. The mouse was "encouraged" to 'play nice'. That is my theory.
Thanks!I think, first off this is a wonderful post, as most of your posts are. That being, I don't think a fifth gate is a good idea at this time. They should focus on expanding and revamping the pre existing four parks first. Though I'd have the new park blue skyed so that you have everything as planned as possible in order to expedite the process.
Had Iger paid attention to WDW and its competitors it may be more of an option, but he didn't and still hasn't.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.