SeaCastle
Well-Known Member
I can't help but think of Martin Sheen's character in Oliver Stone's Wall Street, "Stop going for the easy buck and start producing something with your life. Create, instead of living off of the buying and selling of others."
It still does not make sense to me that even in the face of Universal and SeaWorld upping their game beyond precedent, Disney pursues - spending more money that Uni/SW will - a data mining program that not only won't affect or add to the guest experience, but pursue a business model with unproven success (i.e. Facebook) and apply it to a theme park and hospitality business. It would be another business altogether if Disney operated in the same market as Facebook or Google but they are not. As Lee pointed out, how valuable could data mining theme park visitors actually be?
For such a fiscally conservative company (at least for Walt Disney World), spending so much money on something so nebulous seems out of character. Management would drop a cool two billion for this, but not for something as basic as maintenance or re-investment in current assets? It's not as if the company doesn't have money to spend. Kevin Yee pointed out the inexcusable state of Splash Mountain, noting that this wasn't a company on the verge of bankruptcy, yet it treats its parks as such. Simply baffling.
It still does not make sense to me that even in the face of Universal and SeaWorld upping their game beyond precedent, Disney pursues - spending more money that Uni/SW will - a data mining program that not only won't affect or add to the guest experience, but pursue a business model with unproven success (i.e. Facebook) and apply it to a theme park and hospitality business. It would be another business altogether if Disney operated in the same market as Facebook or Google but they are not. As Lee pointed out, how valuable could data mining theme park visitors actually be?
For such a fiscally conservative company (at least for Walt Disney World), spending so much money on something so nebulous seems out of character. Management would drop a cool two billion for this, but not for something as basic as maintenance or re-investment in current assets? It's not as if the company doesn't have money to spend. Kevin Yee pointed out the inexcusable state of Splash Mountain, noting that this wasn't a company on the verge of bankruptcy, yet it treats its parks as such. Simply baffling.