Although, if you think about it.... in the case of people using flash photography in dark rides....the users are the tools.
:lol:
Although, if you think about it.... in the case of people using flash photography in dark rides....the users are the tools.
So, when Disney "enforces" the no-flash policy, when "punishing" violators, will Disney draw any distinction between intentional and unintentional flashes?
I personally never thought it was that big of a deal. I've taken multiple pictures on certain dark rides and I don't even notice when other do it. As far as pictures from dark rides not coming out, I have multiple pictures from PotC and they're all good pictures. I don't think that either trying to enforce no flash photography or trying to ban cameras will work, because I was just at a convention this past weekend for one of the television shows that I watch and despite the fact that they said no pictures during autographs, there were still people taking pictures of the actors with their phones with the workers from the convention right there and all they did was tell them to put their phones away, but guess how many actually listened? They didn't do anything to the people who didn't listen or took pictures. So I highly doubt that telling someone not to take pictures on a ride, especially when there are no CMs on the ride to enforce it, will work.
I think it's extreme to eject someone from the park for taking one photo. With all the different languages spoken by guests, I think it would make for some very bad confrontations.
On another note if someone was ejected could they park hop to another park?
I'm curious, after reading this thread, will you continue to take flash pictures knowing first of all, you're not supposed to, and secondly, it ruins the experience for so many others? Or, will you continue to do so because it's not a big deal to you?
There should be no "probably" to it. Just don't do it. It's posted on the signs. It is more than obvious that the practice annoys other paying guests. It is still a rule regardless of what sort of backbone (or lack thereof) CM's display on the issue.The last time I went, I hadn't been in five years and the time before that I hadn't been in about fifteen years, so many things had changed between those times and the main reason I took pictures on Pirates the last time was the get pictures of the Captain Jacks, so chances are I won't take pictures the next time and honestly the only other dark rides I've really taken pictures on is Splash Mountain since 2010 was the first time I'd ever been on it and It's A Small World in Disneyland in 2009 since I hadn't been on that since WDW in 1989. So, to be honest, I probably won't be taking pictures on those rides next year.
What if it's an off season and a flash would not be seen by any other guests?
Many of us frequent flyers have had the experience of being the only guest in a portion of an attraction at one time or another.
Then as responsible, coherent adults, we should do what we can to make sure passengers around us on said attraction get to enjoy their experience in a nice, flash-free environment.What if a classic attraction is permanently closing to be demolished for all of eternity?
So then you're willing to boycott (refrain from viewing) any photos or videos of your favorite extinct attractions if they were obtained in violation of the policy?
I doubt it.
Thanks to cameras (and flashes), countless people from around the world are able to relive their favorite classics. ....but we should refrain from documenting an attraction just because it might "interrupt" the ride experience of another guest for literally less than one second? Hmmm..
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.