owlsandcoffee
Well-Known Member
Oh, oopsy. I think I may have been assuming. You know what happens, yadda yadda. Well then in that case nix that.
-
Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.
Politics RUMOR: Lin Manuel Miranda and Weird Al to Redo Hall of Presidents
- Thread starter WDW Pro
- Start date
This thread contains political discussion related to the original thread topic
Oh, oopsy. I think I may have been assuming. You know what happens, yadda yadda. Well then in that case nix that.
Maybe fill the show stages with AA's representing the greatest Disney CEOs since Michael Eisner.
Yes, I know there have only been three. So you'd have Eisner, Iger and Chapek talking for a few minutes about their accomplishments, followed by an AA of Walt himself rating their performances using his personal philosophies as the yardstick.
They may just close it for 12-18 months in that situation with a very small change.
Annnd here’s your reminder
Best info I have is that there are no contracts with different bands nor negotiations at this time.
I find that quite a shocker!
I'll find out more over the weekend hopefully. I do know there's a backup system already in place for the attraction should they suddenly need to not play Aerosmith (death, crime, e.t.c). I don't think they've ever used it so it's probably best of the late 90s lol.
MMFanCipher
Well-Known Member
I seem to be in the minority, but if you think THOP is controversial the issue is with YOU not the show.
tirian
Well-Known Member
I’d say you’re part of the silent majority. This is not political: it’s just a fact. The deep divide started three presidencies ago and grew with each new man. Since audiences (Guests) can’t seem to differentiate between an AA giving a WDI speech and a real person, Disney has been considering changes for a while.
TrainsOfDisney
Well-Known Member
Nothing better than having Lin Miranda create the show in Hall of Presidents....and person whose Hamilton show is wholly inaccurate and revisionist history.
Man if you have a problem with the innaccuracies of Hamilton I hate to suggest that you watch Disney’s Pocahontas!
BromBones
Well-Known Member
No one is hailing the makers of Pocahontas as the second coming.
UNCgolf
Well-Known Member
Hamilton isn't supposed to be a 100% accurate historical depiction; it's a Broadway show. It exists for entertainment. No one should watch it and expect to get the complete historical truth -- if they do, that's on them, not the creators. No one should watch Braveheart, The Patriot, Gladiator, or countless other historical fiction dramas and expect to be getting real history either.
It's an excellent Broadway show, which is why he's getting acclaim.
TrainsOfDisney
Well-Known Member
Nothing better than having Lin Miranda create the show in Hall of Presidents....and person whose Hamilton show is wholly inaccurate and revisionist history.
What makes the show “wholly inaccurate” by the way? The key plot points are all extremely accurate. The biggest issue with accuracy I know of is Burr being present at some extra key moments of Hamilton’s life.
KaliSplash
Well-Known Member
Some of us are fine with HOP And COP just because of the AA's. Has nothing to do with the current political climate. Admittedly I am old, but I Like watching the swaying of the presidents and such, as well as the birds watching the others since in the Tiki Room. The attention to detail in both of these attractions IS the attraction. Ditto COP. But again, I'm getting on up there. (I just remember the first time I had seen these shows, late 70s and was fascinated by the AAs. Must admit the current HOP is better than I expected. I don't remind a re-do as long as we keep the roll call with all our leaders.
RSoxNo1
Well-Known Member
I went to the extent of recording a 1980s treatment for the attraction but couldn't come up with a future treatment that I liked.I realize that’s a highly controversial opinion among fans, and some people are probably shocked to see me say it.
Maybe COP could work if WDI gave it a snappier script and restored the end to the 1960s to make it truly retro. But come on, do you really laugh at the, um, “jokes”?
BromBones
Well-Known Member
Hall of Presidents isn't supposed to be a Broadway show. It's supposed to be an historical lesson.
We don't need more revisionist history from a person with a clear political bias and proclivity.
LittleBuford
Well-Known Member
The current version, which has the sitting president reading a script prepared by Disney, hardly constitutes a straight-up history lesson.
_caleb
Well-Known Member
All of Disney’s history shows have been revisionist: Hall of Presidents, Great Moments With Mr. Lincoln, the American Adventure. They were never intended to be history lessons (if they were, people like you would complain that they don’t pay Disney bucks to go on vacation just to hear a lecture). These shows are just patriotainment.
But they can make Hall of Presidents into whatever they want—maybe once upon a time they were “historical edutainment,“ but it’s clear (to me) that Disney doesn’t think their audiences are interested in edutainment anymore.
RSoxNo1
Well-Known Member
The current version is probably the best version of the attraction and it's basically "Great moments in presidential speeches".
LittleBuford
Well-Known Member
I didn’t criticise the current version; I merely pointed out that it’s not a history lesson.
Demarke
Have I told you lately that I 👍 you?
No one should, but there are an awful lot more people walking out of the Broadway show acting like they just completed a doctoral thesis than walking out of Pocahontas pretending they are authorities on Native American history. And not many performances of the other examples were delayed so the performers could chastise people in the audience that they disagree with politically.