I see that clickbait website strikes again ...
Probably a good call.I trust our insiders way more than I trust that place.
Maybe not another coaster per se, but I do think MK is well overdue for a thrill attraction in the vein of Indy over at Disneyland. Personally I think TRON would make a killer EMV attraction.
For the record, from what I know very recently (which isn't everything by any stretch) the coaster is one option under consideration. I understand it isn't the front runner, nor is it written off yet.
I shouldn't go into details aside from what's already known but personally I wish they'd run with another of the options.Do you know the other options or can't they be shared? If you can't tell us the other options, is the coaster the best one?
I shouldn't go into details aside from what's already known but personally I wish they'd run with another of the options.
Why have two interior coasters side by side?
Why not invest properly in SM?
The show building will not be fully hidden
Traffic patterns would be worsened
Plus other options would still do what's required with the speedway.
So is this one of the options for the big new e ticket that's possible in addition to whatever replaces stitch for the 50th?For the record, from what I know very recently (which isn't everything by any stretch) the coaster is one option under consideration. I understand it isn't the front runner, nor is it written off yet.
I don't think TRON coaster would be the solution. I agree you don't need two indoor coasters next door to each other, especially when SM could use a real overhaul. I hope they go with another option.
I shouldn't go into details aside from what's already known but personally I wish they'd run with another of the options.
Why have two interior coasters side by side?
Why not invest properly in SM?
The show building will not be fully hidden
Traffic patterns would be worsened
Plus other options would still do what's required with the speedway.
Either way they would be replacing Tomorrowland Speedway.Why have two interior coasters side by side?
Why not invest properly in SM?
The show building will not be fully hidden
Traffic patterns would be worsened
And if you can't agree with @jt04, THERE'S THE DOOR!Ultimately though replacing the raceway is a step in the right direction no matter what replaces it.
I don't think TRON coaster would be the solution. I agree you don't need two indoor coasters next door to each other, especially when SM could use a real overhaul. I hope they go with another option.
There's no issue with high demand FPs at the Magic Kingdom. I just ran availability for tomorrow, i.e. one day in advance, and literally everything is available except Mine Train.
The problem is, "..the ones with little kids" are the majority of the people at MK.
MK is not a thrill park. We have those all over this country, including Orlando. The Magic Kingdom is so different, and special, because it appeals to all. There's a "magic" about it that can't compare to any thrill ride or thrill park.
That is why the people with season passes to Cedar Fair or Six Flags parks still spend thousands of dollars to visit Disney World.
I think this is so important. We have multiple go cart places/indoor entertainment where we live. My kiddo is 6, most don't even allow him to ride right now, none allow him to drive.
Having your foot on the pedal while your child is driving horribly, and you're both laughing until your belly aches, is the "perfect" idea of why the MK exists in the first place.
Wow... Add to the fact that the last ride they built in the park was a coaster.I shouldn't go into details aside from what's already known but personally I wish they'd run with another of the options.
Why have two interior coasters side by side?
Why not invest properly in SM?
The show building will not be fully hidden
Traffic patterns would be worsened
Plus other options would still do what's required with the speedway.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.