A lot more than cheap. The original was around a quarter of the cost of the original park.Ah yes teach me.
How much was Ratatouille?
The Epcot version is substantially more.
A lot more than cheap. The original was around a quarter of the cost of the original park.Ah yes teach me.
How much was Ratatouille?
According to wikipedia, an estimated 270 million USD to build the Ratatouille attraction in Disneyland Paris.Ah yes teach me.
How much was Ratatouille?
To be fair, Disney Studios Paris doesn't seem like it was an expensive park at all.A lot more than cheap. The original was around a quarter of the cost of the original park.
The Epcot version is substantially more.
According to wikipedia, an estimated 270 million USD to build the Ratatouille attraction in Disneyland Paris.
...You're just trolling right? You can't be serious...They shoulda spent 280 million then.
Spider man on Broadway cost almost $80 million. Still looked cheap.
Does Wikipedia state if this lump sum is just the attraction, or does it include the attraction area?
I took it with a drone in 1983!That's a great photo? Where did it come? May I use it?
A lot more than cheap. The original was around a quarter of the cost of the original park.
The Epcot version is substantially more.
So does that mean that it's been "plussed"?
So does that mean that it's been "plussed"?
No, it went through the money grinder of re-engineering everything in American measurement units and building codes being done by workers paid a lot more placing it in a land that needed extensive renovations.
It certainly wasn’t when it was built. Even Eisner admitted it. After opening.To be fair, Disney Studios Paris doesn't seem like it was an expensive park at all.
Perhaps the building facade is pricy, but I assure you this ride was built cheap.
I never denied there were others being built. I’m hoping Rise of the Resistance blows us out of the water. But Remy’s Adventure is a cheap cheap cheap ride with very expensive packaging.
There's a difference between "this feels cheap" and "this really was cheap". You know how much the attraction cost? (And no, not defending the ride, I've never experienced it)
Plenty was spent on it. You just don’t like how they spent it. Throwing more money at it isn’t the answer.More should have been spent on it.
Plenty was spent on it. You just don’t like how they spent it. Throwing more money at it isn’t the answer.
It can be rather well understood now. The artwork is largely irrelevant because my critique is about the urban design, something that is focused more on plan and massing, and not the specific architecture.I was referring to how it feels when we actually start making that walk back to the new area. Obviously we can form some preliminary opinions based on the plans and artwork, but it’ll likely change for better or worse when we’re there in person.
Perhaps you’re right. If 270 million was thrown at it already...
I don't think Hagrids was meant to compete with or be a counter to Slinky Dog Dash and Seven Dwarfs Mine coaster. What I mean by this is Hagrids is more of an e-ticket Edition 2 Islands of Adventure. Both Slinky Dog Dash and Seven Dwarfs Mine Train are not, though I would concede that Seven Dwarfs Mine Train is supposed to be the Marquee attraction of New Fantasyland. That all said, I think a more apt comparison might be Hagrid's to Tron. Of which I do think Hagrid's is going to win that battle. I'm interested to see how that plays out.
Topic-wise? Probably.Wrong thread?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.