Gringrinngghost
Well-Known Member
I LEAVE FOR 12 HOURS AND....
What did the tweet say?
First, DisTwitter is cray cray. There's no moderator to reel in the most absurd and disrespectful and even hateful tweets. Anyone thinking that DisTwitter is representative of the Disney park fanbase doesn't know DisTwitter and it's excesses in both pixie dusting and Disney nerdrage.
Second, all Chris did was call out the use of telephoto shots of the barges/ring. And that's because the telephoto shots are a lie. People who use them are absolutely not making a good faith argument, and they deserve derision for that visual exaggeration. Chris just lol'd at their use of telephoto. He didn't say any of the mean stuff about them that I'm saying about them.
Third, for so much nothing of an issue (i.e., calling out telephoto shots as a false visual), it's disgusting to see the pile-on on Chris and people hoping he'll get fired. There's your cancel culture at work. Such delicate snowflakes for having their telephoto malarkey getting called out. Jeez, grow a spine.
Mind you. I've never defended the barges. But I will call out bad faith exaggerations unmoored from reality.
Even without the zoom... its still just as awful. The same problems are there either way. This isnt like forcing your body into some odd position to make this happen.I think it sums up what's wrong with Disney fandom in that their telephoto malarkey is called out and they have a cow over it.
I agree, that’s why I was askingBy going to guest relations and filing a complaint. Not by bullying someone on the internet.
While it is extremely bad show and unprofessional having someone involved with a project laughing at the fanbase, divebombing them on social media isn't the right answer.
What was said in this Twitter spat?
Anyone have a screenshot?What was said in this Twitter spat?
I am also surprised they have ditched the Illuminations brand entirely. It's such a classic Disney/Epcot title that I really think they should have kept to help build Epcot's brand. It seems to me that Illuminations very quickly became synonymous with a light, laser, firework, and whatever-else-they-want-to-add show on the World Showcase lagoon incorporating the pavilions. Periodically having "a new Illuminations" rather than a new nighttime spectacular to promote would strengthen the idea that Epcot (and the show) was something unique.Disney had already established Illuminations as a brand that could change to tie into different celebrations (WDW's 25th, Millennium Celebration etc). In hindsight, it would have been simpler, and possibly just as effective, to do a 4th version of the show.
But this project feels like it's part of the statement that Disney wants to make as part of the reinvention of EPCOT by doing "big things".
This is my view. I don't like Twitter mobs whatever the cause and I've never liked the campaigns to get people fired as I don't think many people consider what that can mean for a person. Still, that was a bad response to what seems to be an almost universal dislike among fans for having the barges out on the lagoon all day. The dismissive attitude also suggests he doesn't think they're that big a deal, and I think it's reasonable to raise an eyebrow at the implications of that.I honestly don’t want anybody fired. What I do believe however is that it’s wiser to be the better example and be humble rather than only make the PR worse by laughing at or mocking the fan response. He’s in a higher position & is supposed to represent Disney’s class & professionalism. Why doesn’t he just not say anything & wait for the final response when the final show has debuted?
When our Spirit @WDW1974 returns you know **** hit the fan! Welcome back
Here’s the tweet for everyone asking. No I don’t think anybody should be fired but it’s definitely not a professional thing to say.
Yikes. It's times like this that I almost wish I didn't notice these kind of details.Not only is the tweet in question deleted, so is much of that accounts recent activity. Yesterday his bio referenced his position at imagineering and his role as producer on Epcot & SSE. Recent tweets were not only regarding Epcot and elements of the redesign, but also veered into political territory. This morning, save his SSE banner photo almost every TWDC reference has apparently been removed from his Twitter history.
EF was/is great, if you take off the ending.I certainly would be bias or have strong views if I was working on Epcot right now. I know someone who had a hand in EF and was hurt by backlash on that. These people do work hard.
A surprising lack of maturity on display here! All I’ll say is, someone losing their job over a bad decision and bad attitude in response to customers isn’t cancel culture. That’s getting fired because they suck at their job.
The mouse only fires you for social media posts after multiple warnings and a gentle talking to from Pedro Pascal!Disney, like any company, has rules about what people can say about them, or on behalf of them, on social media.
The tweet was simply not the best decision. Worth getting fired over? No, but he may have gotten a note about it from the Mouse.
And now his account is private.Not only is the tweet in question deleted, so is much of that accounts recent activity.
Not only is the tweet in question deleted, so is much of that accounts recent activity. Yesterday his bio referenced his position at imagineering and his role as producer on Epcot & SSE. Recent tweets were not only regarding Epcot and elements of the redesign, but also veered into political territory. This morning, save his SSE banner photo almost every TWDC reference has apparently been removed from his Twitter history.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.